The quaint idea of a woman staying home to raise a large family on one income is a bygone fantasy for the vast majority of people.
It's bygone (mostly - my wife stayed home for 6-7 years until our youngest went to kindergarten), but it's not bigoted.
It's a sad reflection on the fact that once a large enough percentage of people started doing it, everyone had to do it to keep up.
My dad talks about how his mother, my grandmother, was a school nurse, and she was one of the only working mothers growing up in his neighborhood in New Jersey as a kid. They did it because my grandfather didn't make very much and it was their way to get a little ahead, be able to afford a house, take a vacation to a beach or a campground every now and then.
Well, as we now know, kids, increased demand (and ability to pay) just makes the supply dry up.
Prices then go up.
Then everyone has to have a second income in the house.
The problem is economic scarcity. It's not billionaires hogging all the money, which is another way to say "hogging all the pieces of paper."
It's that there's not enough stuff. Too little quantity. We can always make more stuff.
You can't make more land but you can build more housing on that land by building up (or down).
Make more stuff: The answer to all our problems.
But, and herein lies the catch -- the anti-capitalists don't like this solution because it goes against another identity that they've wrapped themselves in: environmentalism.
So their solution is to take away the wealth from the rich, so to establish the egalitarian baseline in poverty and not wealth.