Could be Woodson year.
I recall one (among many) tackles Woodson made. RB comes steaming through the LOS into the secondary. Woodson assumes the classic tackling position, lowers his head, sticks his nose right in there and tackles the guy. He got dinged in the process. Had to be helped off the field. I don't think you see many tackles like that, if any, being made in today's game.
I always said he was a textbook tackler.I recall one (among many) tackles Woodson made. RB comes steaming through the LOS into the secondary. Woodson assumes the classic tackling position, lowers his head, sticks his nose right in there and tackles the guy. He got dinged in the process. Had to be helped off the field. I don't think you see many tackles like that, if any, being made in today's game.
I have no idea what some nerd sportswriter knows that is supremely better than coaches and/or a committee of former players.Woodson is an example of why writers should have no voting power. I’d guess most of them are stat pumping morons and that’s what they base most of their decisions on. Anyone who knows anything about football and watched Woodson play, knows he was one of the very best ever and was the key to those Super Bowl defenses due to his ability to cover the slot.
This has got to be the year, right?
Right, guys?
Yep.I'll believe it when I see it unfortunately.