2023 Random Cowboys Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

bbgun

every dur is a stab in the heart
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
30,593
Disregard any lasting impression based off a game vs a team as bad as New York is this year.

I'm more encouraged by the team's steady improvement, particularly the offense's, since San Francisco.

I think if we can fix Terence Steele, we have a shot to do a lot of damage in the playoffs.
Beat a team on the road that has a winning record (Buffalo, Miami) and I'll start paying attention.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
45,963
Beat a team on the road that has a winning record (Buffalo, Miami) and I'll start paying attention.

True that something like that would be a better litmus test (shout-out Dak for not knowing what that is) than the Giants, but I've contended that the only real test will be in the second round of the playoffs and beyond, and I'm going to hold to that. Even if they sweep through buffalo and Miami.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
45,963
you have to consider the shitty ending, against the shitty opponent. Then the next series went 3 and out.

The shitty ending matters, but it also matters that they drove to a point in the field that was so disadvantageous to the Giants when they took over that the Giants couldn't dig themselves out of it and they gave the ball back to us around midfield.

Our first drive was not entirely unsuccessful despite the lack of points.
 

Cujo

I choose to stroll amongst the waste…
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
6,036
Beat a team on the road that has a winning record (Buffalo, Miami) and I'll start paying attention.

No shit. Sorry, but I'm not excited by this win. This is what we've been doing; beat the brakes off inferior teams and then shit the bed playing someone over .500.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,236
Beat a team on the road that has a winning record (Buffalo, Miami) and I'll start paying attention.
Steady improvement while staying in contention is the key.

We suck on grass. Our team is built for speed while the Eagles and especially 49ers are made for grass and grass-hybrid turf.

Getting our offense right, and then getting better on grass/hybrid surfaces should be our focus.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,693
Listening to the Fan today I heard a couple of things that were interesting.

First Skip Peete told them on his way out that if they wanted to feature Tony Pollard then they would need to get a second RB. Team ignored that evidently.

Second the guys on the radio said that Pollard admitted 3 different times last year that he was a 15 carry guy and after 15 he was done. I don't know what the done means exactly. Either he is saying that is all he wants or he is admitting to what the doubters think of him.

Just more evidence that the FO dropped the ball on the position.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
21,234
Listening to the Fan today I heard a couple of things that were interesting.

First Skip Peete told them on his way out that if they wanted to feature Tony Pollard then they would need to get a second RB. Team ignored that evidently.

Second the guys on the radio said that Pollard admitted 3 different times last year that he was a 15 carry guy and after 15 he was done. I don't know what the done means exactly. Either he is saying that is all he wants or he is admitting to what the doubters think of him.

Just more evidence that the FO dropped the ball on the position.
This was obvious to pretty much anybody paying attention, I think McCarthy just loved Dowdle way more than most (or all).
 
  • Props
Reactions: p1_

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,693
This was obvious to pretty much anybody paying attention, I think McCarthy just loved Dowdle way more than most (or all).
I found it interesting that it was blatantly put out there and nothing done. I do like Dowdle as a #2 now but nobody knew that going in. It took a last minute decision for him to even be on the team. The FO just continues to handicap the team everytime you turn around.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
45,963
guys on the radio said that Pollard admitted 3 different times last year that he was a 15 carry guy and after 15 he was done.

I remember that from last year and I think that turned out to be not true. I think they are referring to this and misremembering:


Cowboys running backs coach Skip Peete told Clarence Hill Jr. of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram that Pollard said he was "done" after 30 plays in Sunday's win over the Chicago Bears.

"[Pollard] played a total of 30 plays, and I think that’s his max—as far as total play count— because then the juice doesn’t become the same and he’s not as quick, not as fast," Peete said of the 25-year-old.




And Pollard's response:


Week 9, the Cowboys finally had an opportunity to see what Pollard looked like when given a feature back role as Elliott sat out with a knee injury; but curiously, he played only 53% of the snaps against the Chicago Bears. (He still took his 15 touches for 147 total yards and three touchdowns.) When asked about it, Cowboys running backs coach Skip Peete told reporters that he feels Pollard has around a 30-snap-per-game maximum because he becomes not quite as effective after that.

Pollard seemingly disagrees. "I definitely can do more" than 30 snaps, Pollard said, per the Dallas Morning News. "I'm pretty sure he didn't mean exactly a 30-play cutoff."
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,693
I remember that from last year and I think that turned out to be not true. I think they are referring to this and misremembering:


Cowboys running backs coach Skip Peete told Clarence Hill Jr. of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram that Pollard said he was "done" after 30 plays in Sunday's win over the Chicago Bears.

"[Pollard] played a total of 30 plays, and I think that’s his max—as far as total play count— because then the juice doesn’t become the same and he’s not as quick, not as fast," Peete said of the 25-year-old.




And Pollard's response:


Week 9, the Cowboys finally had an opportunity to see what Pollard looked like when given a feature back role as Elliott sat out with a knee injury; but curiously, he played only 53% of the snaps against the Chicago Bears. (He still took his 15 touches for 147 total yards and three touchdowns.) When asked about it, Cowboys running backs coach Skip Peete told reporters that he feels Pollard has around a 30-snap-per-game maximum because he becomes not quite as effective after that.

Pollard seemingly disagrees. "I definitely can do more" than 30 snaps, Pollard said, per the Dallas Morning News. "I'm pretty sure he didn't mean exactly a 30-play cutoff."

Good. Im glad he didnt say that because thats not a guy that I would want on my team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom