ravidubey
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 20,207
Sorry, not you. I think some others place too much stock in his draft position and not enough stock in how he's been on practice squads for two years.What Williams love?
Sorry, not you. I think some others place too much stock in his draft position and not enough stock in how he's been on practice squads for two years.What Williams love?
It's a little disengenuous to say "no RB". Unless you believe McFadden/Randle are worse than Hambrick/Cason any RB who's worthy of a roster spot should at least be somewhat effective behind this offensive line.And now, I don't think we will be on the verge of a conference championship game this year without a running back.
I disagree. If we couldn't get past GB because of the pass rush not being able to get to a hobbled Rogers, it doesn't matter that we lost Murray. With an equivalent RB option, the pass rush issue remains should you get back to the same situation. The pass rush had to be upgraded.Our biggest issue last year was pass rush, because we had Murray last year. We don't get to Green bay in the second round without Murray, but we got there without a pass rush. Therefore once we let Murray go, RB became by far our biggest issue.
Regardless, we addressed pass rush. We mostly ignored RB. I don't think we wanted to ignore it. But we did.
And now, I don't think we will be on the verge of a conference championship game this year without a running back.
Their offense always seems pretty good. The problem is their defense sucks donkey nuts and they haven't done anything to make me believe their defense will turn the corner.Giants are the team I'm scared of, not the Eagles. If Eli doesn't play like a retard, they are going to have an extremely dangerous offense.
The passing will not be A+ without a running game to feed off of. Romo will be banged up and interception prone again if we can't keep balance on offense.isn't going to cut what? Cut it in the division? I sincerely doubt A+ passing and C+ rushing isn't enough to overtake the bag of ass that is Wash, NYG, and Philly.
true of any passing offense. But I didn't say no running game. I said C+. Or average. As in the type of rushing attack Romo never had in 2013 or 2014.The passing will not be A+ without a running game to feed off of. Romo will be banged up and interception prone again if we can't keep balance on offense.
If we go 500 carries (comitted) and under 2000 yards (productive) with this offensive line I'll challenge any two navy men of your choice to a drinking contest.true of any passing offense. But I didn't say no running game. I said C+. Or average. As in the type of rushing attack Romo never had in 2013 or 2014.
Also there's a big difference between a committed running game and a productive running game. Check the stats for 2008 I promise you we had a very productive running game.
My point exactly, drinking contest not withstanding. The key to winning has more to do with commitment to the run than YPC. Assuming that the move to run first was Linehan's influence, we should probably see at least 450 attempts. Since last year Linehan's role has expanded to OC, and the edict from the GM is "run damnit".If we go 500 carries (comitted) and under 2000 yards (productive) with this offensive line I'll challenge any two navy men of your choice to a drinking contest.
My point being even by giving up something in the running game, if the gain in pass rush is enough, it can overcome the loss.Great that we upgraded the pass rush. Not so great that we downgraded the running game.
I have a really hard time imaging this team averaging less then 4 ypc behind this offensive line.If we go 500 carries (comitted) and under 2000 yards (productive) with this offensive line I'll challenge any two navy men of your choice to a drinking contest.
The opponents are also pros.I have a really hard time imaging this team averaging less then 4 ypc behind this offensive line.
We have 3 all-pros on the line. With a consensus top pick joining them. If you know of a defensive front that loaded, then yes, we will likely struggle against them.The opponents are also pros.
IMO it's about being able to threaten run almost regardless of the situation. Murray could run against an 8-man front because he consistently beat at least one defender.We have 3 all-pros on the line. With a consensus top pick joining them. If you know of a defensive front that loaded, then yes, we will likely struggle against them.
They have a truly great WR and are solid at RB. They always seem to play physical defense, regardless of the talent.Giants are the team I'm scared of, not the Eagles. If Eli doesn't play like a retard, they are going to have an extremely dangerous offense.
So we wouldn't spend a 4th on the guy who made him expendable, but we'll give a 3rd for him...?Lamar Miller is now my pet cat trade target. I think he'd be a superstar here. Hopefully he's available for a 4th or less. I might even go 3rd for him.
You keep saying Randle can't make any body miss when the evidence has been posted multiple times showing him make people miss, so that narrative is unequivically false.IMO it's about being able to threaten run almost regardless of the situation. Murray could run against an 8-man front because he consistently beat at least one defender.
You could have the Justice League on the offensive line but if your RB can't consistently beat that one defender the other team can contain your running game. You get Randle-syndrome, taking exactly what's blocked for you.
Then the down and distance charts will be screaming at the OC to pass the football. And Romo will succeed at it... until he doesn't. We've seen this before when the man feels like he has to do everything which is of course impossible.
Garrett has proven he doesn't have the coaching chops nor is the team built to run a pass-heavy, pass-first offense. Our supporting receivers have improved, but I don't know how much I trust them.
I feel that Garrett wants to be a run first guy, but his instincts combined with Romo's mentality can give him tunnel vision. Linehan is a much more disciplined playcaller, who can have a feel for the game. It's not like it took Garrtett getting stumped to force him to abandone the run. He did it with top backs who were tearing up the other team with 7 YPC.IMO it's about being able to threaten run almost regardless of the situation. Murray could run against an 8-man front because he consistently beat at least one defender.
You could have the Justice League on the offensive line but if your RB can't consistently beat that one defender the other team can contain your running game. You get Randle-syndrome, taking exactly what's blocked for you.
Then the down and distance charts will be screaming at the OC to pass the football. And Romo will succeed at it... until he doesn't. We've seen this before when the man feels like he has to do everything which is of course impossible.
Garrett has proven he doesn't have the coaching chops nor is the team built to run a pass-heavy, pass-first offense. Our supporting receivers have improved, but I don't know how much I trust them.