Jets Stuff...
- Thread starter Iamtdg
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 31,018
I would not. Just can't bring myself to wish for that sort of stuff.
yimyammer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
- Messages
- 837
don't mind me, I'm just grumpy as all hell from 25 years of Jeri's bullshit
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 31,018
Don't get me wrong I'm tired of the same old same old too. I just can't stand losing. Never could.
yimyammer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
- Messages
- 837
I'm the same way, thus why I'm so grumpy and jaded, all they ever do is tease and choke when it matters. I'm sick of it and believe the only thing that could possibly make jeri miserable (besides having to watch a great coach come in here, change things up while making jeri an afterthought and winning without jeri front and center) is catastrophic, sustained failure.
So if 3 or 4 years of 3-13 brought that fucker to his knees, I'd gladly see them lose because at this point I'd get more satisfaction out Jeri's misery than a few meaningless wins that lead no where
but they'll find a way to keep dancing around mediocrity, sneak a playoff or two occasionally but never have what it takes to win it all again
its so hopeless but I'm a glutton for punishment and can't seem to just walk away
Its been 25 years of this nonsense and jeri prints money regardless because we're dumbass fans that hang around regardless
p1_
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Messages
- 8,490
I have to ask. Why do you spell Jerry's name the way you do?
NoDak
Hotlinking' sonofabitch
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 12,258
I don't think he's a member here.
p1_
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Messages
- 8,490
yimyammer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
- Messages
- 837
lol, I know, I'm just blind with hate
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 16,496
The Jets defense has actually been pretty good this year. Even though they gave up 31 to the Eagles, only 17 of those points were scored on the Jets D.
I suspect we're going to see another slow start from the Cowboys offense going up against that Jets D. The good news is the Jets offense isn't good enough to jump out to a big lead early like the Packers. So unless the Cowboys have another rash of turnovers or give up scores on punt/kick returns, there should be no excuse not to keep Zeke and Pollard heavily involved in the game plan for all 4 quarters.
I suspect we're going to see another slow start from the Cowboys offense going up against that Jets D. The good news is the Jets offense isn't good enough to jump out to a big lead early like the Packers. So unless the Cowboys have another rash of turnovers or give up scores on punt/kick returns, there should be no excuse not to keep Zeke and Pollard heavily involved in the game plan for all 4 quarters.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 11,592
I believe I was in the same boat as yim is for years. More openly about it last season at the beginning and I did get caught up in the winning. I was reminded yet again as to why that was a bad thing. Im not falling for it again so while not openly rooting for a loss I won't lose my mind when they do. Its just expected now and I will patiently wait for the firing.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 31,018
We could luck into a Superbowl and I'd still want Garrett fired. He just doesn't bring enough to the table and he would never be able to repeat it. Even with that we aren't going to any Superbowls. The sad thing is you can see the weaknesses on the team that will cost us games. But there is never any effort to fix them. It's just more "So and so just needs to get better and work through this."
Chocolate Lab
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 2,800
Darnold cleared to play Sunday. Game just got a little more interesting.
Simpleton
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 7,428
I'm glad Darnold is playing, they're simply a below average to bad team with him as opposed to an abject disaster without him, so if this team is worth a shit this is a relatively easy win either way. The last thing these bunch of dipshits needed was their ego stroked after beating a completely defenseless Luke Falk-led team by 25.
lostxn
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 6,187
Darnold is a below average starting QB at this point in his career. This shouldn’t change things too much. Our defense really needs to get their shit together and this is just the team they should beat up on. Bell is not the type of RB out LBers should struggle with. We shall see...
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 58,509
The difference between Darnold and Luke Falk is pretty significant. One guy looks like he can play one day. The other guy is like Mike White was.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 58,509
That is why you assholes need to appreciate them more.Does Booze have to watch a few Jets games in order to write the primer? If so ..
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 31,018
Yeah it is a very big difference. Luke Falk isn't even backup NFL QB level. He doesn't even belong on an NFL roster level. While Darnold might not be great he is worlds better.
We absolutely should win and there is no excuse to lose to Darnold or Falk. But if we don't come to play Darnold will beat us. We probably could have sleepwalked and still beat Falk.
lostxn
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 6,187
He’s no Teddy Bridgewater.
L.T. Fan
I'm Easy If You Are
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 19,163
The Saints are using Bridgewater in the same fashion that Dak was utilized his rookie year. It was a limited scheme where every play was scripted and structured for short gains but long enough the keep possession and go down the field with the run game sprinkled in to keep defenses honest. It was very effective for Dak because he didn’t have to deal with all the reads. Bridgewater is keeping the Saints going with a very similar approach and it was good enough to hand a win over the Cowboys. The Cowboys defense wasn’t structured for this scheme and played off to far. It was perfect for the Saints to take small bites and move the ball from first down to first down all the way downfield.He’s no Teddy Bridgewater.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 31,018
Luke Falk really isn't. He can't even do what Bridgewater does. It's going to be sad when some NFL team signs Bridgewater to be their starting QB and he dinks and dunks his way on a shitty team to a shitty record though.He’s no Teddy Bridgewater.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 31,018
jsmith6919
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2013
- Messages
- 14,704
I could see him getting close to 100 counting receiving, especially if we get up by 14+ and go to prevent
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 11,592
He got hurt on one of the Kick returns. Pretty good limp coming off the field.
Simpleton
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 7,428
Smith will definitely play and I'd be surprised if Collins wasn't in as well. He came back to the sideline under his own power after going in the locker room with his pads and helmet on and seemed to be warming up to test his knee to see if he could go back in. The fact that he was even allowed to do that tells me he likely plays a full week later.
pdom
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 28,168
I was very interested in playing Luke Falk just to see how low we could go in the "play down to our competition" level. It definitely would be lower than our Matt Flynn loss. Maybe even lower than our 1987 scabs loss.
p1_
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Messages
- 8,490
thats pretty impressive with Tyron. He's just a tough sumbitch.