Archer: Upon Further Review - Cowboys Week 14

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,237
Upon Further Review: Cowboys Week 14

December, 10, 2013

By Todd Archer | ESPNDallas.com


CHICAGO -- A review of four hot issues from the Dallas Cowboys' 45-28 loss to the Chicago Bears on Monday.

Go for it: With 10:37 left in the third quarter and the Cowboys trailing 27-14, Jason Garrett passed on a chance to give his team a jolt. Facing fourth-and-4 from the Chicago 41, Garrett elected to punt even though his defense had done nothing to slow down the Bears. Chicago answered with a 14-play, 90-yard drive that ended with a 4-yard touchdown catch by Matt Forte to seal the win.

"We thought about going," Garrett said. "We were still right in the middle of the field and still a long way to go on that … You start getting into those discussions when you're putting it all together: how much time is on the clock, the score and what they're doing offensively. We thought the right move there was to play a little bit of field position and obviously it didn't work out very well for us."

Time for a rebound: One week after allowing 51 points to the Denver Broncos, the Cowboys allowed only 16 points to the Washington Redskins. One week after allowing 623 yards and 24 fourth-quarter points in a loss to the Detroit Lions, they were able to limit theMinnesota Vikings. After giving up 625 yards and 40 first downs to the New Orleans Saints, they used the bye week to get things right against the New York Giants. And now after Monday's loss they have to rebound again on a short week with the Green Bay Packerscoming to Arlington.

"They'll be a lot of things we look at in terms of what we're playing," Garrett said. "We'll look at who's involved and we have to step back and watch the tape before we make any of those assessments right now. We've done that on a couple of occasions this year and we simply have to do it again."

No breaks: In a 17-point defeat that did not seem that close there are not one or two plays that could have changed momentum, but the Cowboys saw any chance get wiped out because of a holding penalty on Brandon Carr. The flag wiped out a Sterling Mooreinterception. Garrett said he did not have a good view of the play. The penalty might have been the right call, but the flag came after Moore started to return the turnover upfield. That came two plays after Bruce Carter dropped an interception down the seam.

Where's the pass rush? Monte Kiffin's 4-3 scheme is predicated on getting pressure on the quarterback with just four pass-rushers. In the past two games the Cowboys have one sack and it was a fourth-quarter sack Monday by DeMarcus Ware when the game was out of hand. If the Cowboys can't rush the passer, they can't play zone coverage. Quarterbacks have just ripped them apart. The Cowboys paid Carr $50 million. They rewarded Orlando Scandrick with a solid extension as their nickel corner. They traded up to the sixth pick to take Morris Claiborne in the 2012 draft. But all of those moves are proof that a pass rush makes a secondary, not the other way around.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,559
Where's the pass rush? Monte Kiffin's 4-3 scheme is predicated on getting pressure on the quarterback with just four pass-rushers. In the past two games the Cowboys have one sack and it was a fourth-quarter sack Monday by DeMarcus Ware when the game was out of hand. If the Cowboys can't rush the passer, they can't play zone coverage. Quarterbacks have just ripped them apart. The Cowboys paid Carr $50 million. They rewarded Orlando Scandrick with a solid extension as their nickel corner. They traded up to the sixth pick to take Morris Claiborne in the 2012 draft. But all of those moves are proof that a pass rush makes a secondary, not the other way around.[/FONT][/COLOR]
:lol

You'd think it would be proof. Somehow we'll still get people clapping next time we take a DB in the first round even though our OL, DL and LBs are atrocious.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
:lol

You'd think it would be proof. Somehow we'll still get people clapping next time we take a DB in the first round even though our OL, DL and LBs are atrocious.
We'll just use the Spencer injury and Ratliff situation as an excuse, then it will be the same old thing again.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
At least they'll both be gone, thus necessitating finding their replacements.
Michael Bennett from Seattle, Michael Johnson from Cincy, Greg Hardy from Carolina are young guys with some upside that we may not have to break the bank for.

I think if we want a DT that's any good we'll have to draft one or pay through the nose for Melton or Lamarr Houston (who could play inside IMO).
 
Top Bottom