Amazon’s TNF Ratings Dip

1bigfan13

Your favorite player's favorite player
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
27,174
Some good news.

-----------------------------------


Amazon is six weeks into its multi-billion-dollar deal to stream the NFL’s “Thursday Night Football” games, and viewership has fallen by several million people. :towel

There’s no panic from either the ecommerce giant or the NFL because, as both have stated, their deal is long-term and not focused on week-to-week numbers with a still-emerging technology that audiences are still adopting.

The audience decline is both in the Nielsen-measured viewership — it’s Nielsen data that Amazon uses to sell TNF airtime to advertisers — and in Amazon’s internal first-party viewership data.

The inaugural Amazon Prime Video TNF game this season was Week 2’s Chiefs-Chargers thriller that averaged 13 million per Nielsen and 15.2 million per Amazon’s data. Fast-forward to last week’s Cardinals-Saints shootout and the numbers are 7.8 million (Nielsen) and 8.9 million (Amazon + Nielsen).

That’s a 40 percent rate of decline for Nielsen numbers and 41.4 percent for Amazon numbers. It should be noted that the Cardinals-Saints game streamed against the rare “sports equinox” of all five major leagues playing on the same day (along with several other sports properties).

Still, the games have declined in viewership every week in Amazon’s own metrics, and in four of the weeks following the TNF season opener, per the Nielsen data.

Amazon Prime Video TNF viewership

DATERESULTNIELSENAMAZONLOCAL TV
Sept. 15Chiefs 27, Chargers 2413 million15.3 million1.16 million
Sept. 22Browns 29, Steelers 1711.03 million13.6 million1.18 million
Sept. 29Bengals 27, Dolphins 1511.7 million13.4 million531,000
Oct. 6Colts 12, Broncos 99.7 million11 million684,000
Oct. 13Commanders 12, Bears 78.8 million10.5 million1.26 million
Oct. 20Cardinals 42, Saints 347.8 million8.9 millionn/a
(Note: All data provided by Amazon; the linear local TV numbers are broken out from the overall totals.)

How much of the overall audience fall-off stems from casual viewer curiosity waning — and losing fans frustrated over technical issues such as picture and sound quality — versus regulars turning off a couple of underwhelming games isn’t clear.

A bad, sloppy game is deadly in any sport for viewership, and for TNF the Colts-Broncos game on Oct. 6 and the Commanders-Bears game on Oct. 13 were the football version of the “Not great, Bob!” meme.

What is known is that it’s an 11-year contract that has Amazon paying the NFL a reported $1.2 billion a season for the right to stream the Thursday games (they also air on local over-the-air TV in each week’s participating team’s home markets; more below on that).

Both the NFL and Amazon view the deal as a long-term play, which makes sense, and don’t place much stock in the vagaries of weekly audience data. Instead, both have said producing a high-quality broadcast/stream and viewing experience is most important in terms of their internal success metrics and goals. Viewers have taken to social media to praise or damn Amazon for their viewing experience.



It’s Amazon policy not to comment on the week-to-week fluctuations in TNF viewership. Marie Donoghue, Amazon’s vice president of global sports video, did explain the company’s strategic view around TNF viewership during a conference call this summer: “This is the start of an 11-year deal, of course we want the biggest audience possible. But this is a big change for fans, and we know it’ll take some time,” she said.

Over the summer, I asked Brian Rolapp, the NFL’s chief media and business officer, about the league’s thinking around TNF viewership now that it’s mostly behind a paywall. Like Donoghue, he preached patience.

“We’re taking a package of games that’s been on broadcast TV for a long time and moving it to a digital platform. That’s going to take some time. We’re not overly worried about it,” he said. “We don’t keep score week to week (on audience numbers).”

Of course, the NFL has an entire in-house media unit devoted, among many things, to keeping track of audience numbers. That’s what an $11 billion company that relies on television does.

In reality, even with the declines, the Amazon TNF audience figures still dominate everything else on television on Thursdays, and win the key demographics that advertisers crave.

And maybe just as important for the future of the NFL, the Amazon games have a median viewer age of 46, which it said is seven years younger than the average age of NFL viewers on the linear TV networks.

For the season, Amazon’s TNF games are now averaging 10.3 million viewers per Nielsen Media Research data and 12.1 million with Amazon’s internal numbers baked into the total.

Amazon has told advertisers to expect 12.5 million viewers per TNF game this season, and it could yet achieve or top that number. There are nine TNF games left this season, and several on paper suggest they’ll draw bigger audiences.

Upcoming TNF schedule

DATEMATCHUP
Oct. 27Baltimore Ravens at Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Nov. 3Philadelphia Eagles at Houston Texans
Nov. 10Atlanta Falcons at Carolina Panthers
Nov. 17Tennessee Titans at Green Bay Packers
Dec. 1Buffalo Bills at New England Patriots
Dec. 8Las Vegas Raiders at Los Angeles Rams
Dec. 15San Francisco 49ers at Seattle Seahawks
Dec. 22Jacksonville Jaguars at New York Jets
Dec. 29Dallas Cowboys at Tennessee Titans

And if they don’t hit the guarantees? We’re not privy to Amazon’s agreements with brands, but the logical assumption is the advertisers would get the industry-standard “make-good” ad airtime elsewhere. And if streaming TNF never achieves the desired viewership — we’re a long way from being able to predict that — then the partnership could end at some point. Many eyes across the sports and entertainment industry are fixated on this deal.



How does Amazon’s TNF viewership compare to the past? Comparing to last year isn’t an apples-to-apples equation because Thursday games in 2021 were split between the NFL Network and Fox, or on both along with Amazon simulcast streams. Being on a major cable network exposes any programming to a much larger audience.

The first three 2021 TNF games were on NFL Network alone and averaged 7.57 million viewers. The subsequent three weeks were NFL Network-Fox games that averaged 14 million viewers.

So, this year’s games have been in that range. We’ll know by the end of the year if Amazon can meet the viewership guarantees made to advertisers.

Another question around the situation: How much is traditional television adding to Amazon’s totals? This is important to understand amid the streaming-as-future discussion.

The local linear TV, i.e. non-streaming, accounts for about 9 percent of the total viewership so far, Amazon said. Over the first five games, local TV has accounted for about 963,000 viewers per TNF game. That doesn’t include last week, which didn’t yet have local numbers available.

The linear number is slightly lower than expected because the Dolphins-Bengals game on Sept. 29 occurred after swaths of South Florida were without power following Hurricane Ian. The Miami market’s over-the-air average for that game was just 166,000 viewers.

The biggest local TV numbers so far this season came for the Oct. 13 Commanders-Bears game, which had 1.26 million linear viewership in the Chicago and Washington, D.C., markets. Chicago alone was 881,000 linear TV viewers — an upside to playing in the nation’s third-largest market.

The entire Amazon-NFL deal is a function of the companies trying to navigate the rapidly changing live sports television landscape. For Amazon, it’s a toe-tip beyond its vast streaming video business into the most powerful domestic live sports property — a relatively safe bet for a company that had $470 billion in revenue last year. The online retailer is using TNF to lure new subscribers to its base of roughly 80 million U.S. Prime Video users and to market its various products and services.

For the NFL, it’s a leap into what many across the industry hope is the future of live sports consumption in the near-term: a mix of linear and digital delivery of its inventory, catering to how various generations prefer to consume sports. The league debuted TNF in 2006, so it’s the safest of the NFL’s tentpole national primetime broadcasts with which to experiment with streaming near-exclusively.

The Amazon deal is part of the NFL’s $113 billion in media rights deals inked in 2021.

In other NFL games last week, Fox’s late afternoon window beat everything with 22.28 million viewers led by Chiefs-49ers, with the Pacific Northwest and SoCal seeing Seahawks-Chargers.

The network’s 1 p.m. regional window averaged 13.35 million viewers. That was led by Packers-Commanders along with Giants-Jaguars, Buccaneers-Panthers and Falcons-Bengals.

CBS had only a single-header window and averaged 14.55 million viewers. That was led by Lions-Cowboys followed by Browns-Ravens and Colts-Titans in the early games, and then Jets-Broncos as the lead late afternoon game, with some of the country getting Texans-Raiders.

NBC’s “Sunday Night Football” telecast of Steelers-Dolphins averaged a total audience of 16.5 million viewers, per the network.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,135
Good.
 

1bigfan13

Your favorite player's favorite player
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
27,174
I didn't watch a single second of either of the last two TNF games.
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,473
Poor Al Michaels.

He deserves better than that.

But fuck the NFL for being greedy assholes who claim to care about player safety but then added a 17th game along with a Thursday game.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,133
Small issue, I heard some show complaining about how clunky the forward/rewind was on their app, which I found to be the case, too. Sounds minor but it sucks to go back and watch a play when you can't easily and accurately go where you want to go.

But bigger issue, I've always thought it was very important to have as many games as possible on free TV. So I hope this Prime venture fails and fails hard.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,135
Small issue, I heard some show complaining about how clunky the forward/rewind was on their app, which I found to be the case, too. Sounds minor but it sucks to go back and watch a play when you can't easily and accurately go where you want to go.

But bigger issue, I've always thought it was very important to have as many games as possible on free TV. So I hope this Prime venture fails and fails hard.
The NFL is doing the same thing as Netflix with that whole trying to make money but end up shooting yourself in the foot thing. And they will lose viewers just like Netflix has.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,133
The NFL is doing the same thing as Netflix with that whole trying to make money but end up shooting yourself in the foot thing. And they will lose viewers just like Netflix has.
I hope so. (And no love for Amazon, either.)
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,526
Poor Al Michaels.

He deserves better than that.

But fuck the NFL for being greedy assholes who claim to care about player safety but then added a 17th game along with a Thursday game.
Fuck Al Michaels for bailing to go there for a higher paycheck.
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
50,298
Fuck Al Michaels for bailing to go there for a higher paycheck.
What’s wrong with Al Michaels getting paid more? What moral obligation does he have to accept less?

Blame Jason Garrett. Al Michaels saw him coming onto SNF and said imma GTFO
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
50,298
I wish Amazon would get out of the media business. These big companies don’t need to be everything, but they are constantly seeking revenue growth.
What has Amazon done wrong in the media business? Their NFL coverage is better than expected (can’t say the same for the games itself) for their first year and they’re trying fresh content that doesn’t detract from the game’s broadcast itself like the Dude Perfect whatever and comedy pregame thing. Some will work and some won’t. The Next Gen vision thing has its perks and best is its optional add-on.

As for seeking revenue growth, well, of course.
 
Last edited:

1bigfan13

Your favorite player's favorite player
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
27,174
Fuck Al Michaels for bailing to go there for a higher paycheck.
That's not at all what happened.

Al Michaels did an interview earlier this year and said that it was NBC who wanted to move on. He said they never even offered him a contract. Michaels then went over to Amazon because he wasn't ready to retire.
 

1bigfan13

Your favorite player's favorite player
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
27,174
I honestly don't understand why these networks are forking over $10-$20 million per year contracts for play-by-play guys and analysts. Fans tune in for the game, not the broadcast booth.

If the Cowboys and Packers play a game that game is going to put up huge TV numbers regardless of who's in the booth.

On the other end of that spectrum. If you put Romo and Nantz on a Titans vs Falcons game, no one outside those markets are tuning in for that game. So why exactly are you paying Romo a $17 million salary?

One of these days networks will catch on and those salaries will plummet.
 
Last edited:

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
50,298
I honestly don't understand why these networks are forking over $10-$20 million per year contracts for play-by-play guys and analysts. Fans tune in for the game, not the broadcast booth.

If the Cowboys and Packers play a game that game is going to put up huge TV numbers regardless of who's in the booth.

On the other end of that spectrum. If you put Romo and Nantz on a Titans vs Falcons game, no one outside those markets are tuning in for that game. So why exactly are you paying Romo a $17 million salary?

One of these days this networks will catch on and those salaries will plummet.
Gone are the days of limited entertainment options with Howard Cosell and Johnny Carson being of the few entertaining social commentators that America’s antenna ears could tune into.
 
Last edited:

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,712
I honestly don't understand why these networks are forking over $10-$20 million per year contracts for play-by-play guys and analysts. Fans tune in for the game, not the broadcast booth.

If the Cowboys and Packers play a game that game is going to put up huge TV numbers regardless of who's in the booth.

On the other end of that spectrum. If you put Romo and Nantz on a Titans vs Falcons game, no one outside those markets are tuning in for that game. So why exactly are you paying Romo a $17 million salary?

One of these days networks will catch on and those salaries will plummet.
I completely agree. They are all just bidding against themselves for no reason. All because the NFL is such a money making juggernaut.

Of course the same thing happens with Goodell and his salary. He is getting paid like 63 million a year for a job that basically anyone could do. But when you're dealing with an industry worth billions it just seems reasonable. It's not like an NFL QB where your options are limited to only a few humans in the world that can do what these guys do. The pool is much larger.
 

P_T

Baddest MoFo Around
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
2,069
The issue I have is with Al Michaels booth mate... he is a huge NFL homer, he's constantly spewing sunshine, regardless of what is actually happening on the field.
 
Top Bottom