2024 Cuts & Signings

Status
Not open for further replies.

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
43,707
Which means they should have held on to him until the offseason because Jerry would have traded a 4th for him.
 

Chocolate Lab

Kuato Lives
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
26,659
Which means they should have held on to him until the offseason because Jerry would have traded a 4th for him.
:lol ................................:meh................................ :sad
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,414


Wonder what kind of grade we had on him? Should I be worried?
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,487
49ers drop Hargraves number from $28M to $10M. What’s in it for Hargrave? How the fuck do they do this?


Per a league source, the 49ers recently restructured the contract of Javon Hargrave for 2025 and 2026 in what looks to be a set up to allow for a post June 1 release next year.
The 49ers reduced Hargraves’ base salary from $19.9 million to $2.1 million, dropping Hargraves salary cap number from $28.105 million to $10.305 million in the process. The original cost to cut Hargraves would have been either $24.86 million on the cap or $28.105 million during free agency if using the June 1. This will allow the team to designate Hargraves as a post June 1 release, count for just $10.3 million on the cap during free agency and then have it drop to and have his cap number count for $8.6 million in 2025 if Hargraves is still hurt and defer $17.485 million to 2026.

 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
43,707
49ers drop Hargraves number from $28M to $10M. What’s in it for Hargrave? How the fuck do they do this?


Per a league source, the 49ers recently restructured the contract of Javon Hargrave for 2025 and 2026 in what looks to be a set up to allow for a post June 1 release next year.
The 49ers reduced Hargraves’ base salary from $19.9 million to $2.1 million, dropping Hargraves salary cap number from $28.105 million to $10.305 million in the process. The original cost to cut Hargraves would have been either $24.86 million on the cap or $28.105 million during free agency if using the June 1. This will allow the team to designate Hargraves as a post June 1 release, count for just $10.3 million on the cap during free agency and then have it drop to and have his cap number count for $8.6 million in 2025 if Hargraves is still hurt and defer $17.485 million to 2026.


It looks like they are just pushing it into 2026 and he gets his money either way. I wish we did stuff like this.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
43,707
I mean Elliott still counts against the cap from his first contract, so I mean we kind of have.

That wasn't intentionally pushing money into the future for space to win now. That was a mistaken attempt to secure a player that we erroneously thought would still be helping us at the same level as he did in his prime.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
58,297
That wasn't intentionally pushing money into the future for space to win now. That was a mistaken attempt to secure a player that we erroneously thought would still be helping us at the same level as he did in his prime.
No but we push contracts like that all the time. We just don't do it with any sort of end game of actually adding talent. We just move money around and then claim we never have any despite not actually spending hardly any money. They almost use the funny money approach in the opposite direction to make it look like there is just no money to spend.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
43,707
No but we push contracts like that all the time. We just don't do it with any sort of end game of actually adding talent. We just move money around and then claim we never have any despite not actually spending hardly any money. They almost use the funny money approach in the opposite direction to make it look like there is just no money to spend.

Right, we are perpetually flying by the seat of our pants. But the intending to do something with it is the important part.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom