In season signing and also the position being a RB.
Isn’t everyone?In season signing and also the position being a RB.
The Cards are doing laps around the Jones boys.
2 years $19 million? Yikes.
He was on their top 30 visits
I wonder if we had a high draft grade on him.
Which means they should have held on to him until the offseason because Jerry would have traded a 4th for him.
Jerry will still offer a third for him.
I wonder if we had a high draft grade on him.
Rico extension incomingIn season signing and also the position being a RB.
The Cards are doing laps around the Jones boys.
49ers drop Hargraves number from $28M to $10M. What’s in it for Hargrave? How the fuck do they do this?
Per a league source, the 49ers recently restructured the contract of Javon Hargrave for 2025 and 2026 in what looks to be a set up to allow for a post June 1 release next year.
The 49ers reduced Hargraves’ base salary from $19.9 million to $2.1 million, dropping Hargraves salary cap number from $28.105 million to $10.305 million in the process. The original cost to cut Hargraves would have been either $24.86 million on the cap or $28.105 million during free agency if using the June 1. This will allow the team to designate Hargraves as a post June 1 release, count for just $10.3 million on the cap during free agency and then have it drop to and have his cap number count for $8.6 million in 2025 if Hargraves is still hurt and defer $17.485 million to 2026.
49ers Restructure Javon Hargrave's Contract | Over the Cap
49ers Restructure Javon Hargrave's Contract | Over the Capoverthecap.com
I mean Elliott still counts against the cap from his first contract, so I mean we kind of have.It looks like they are just pushing it into 2026 and he gets his money either way. I wish we did stuff like this.
I mean Elliott still counts against the cap from his first contract, so I mean we kind of have.
No but we push contracts like that all the time. We just don't do it with any sort of end game of actually adding talent. We just move money around and then claim we never have any despite not actually spending hardly any money. They almost use the funny money approach in the opposite direction to make it look like there is just no money to spend.That wasn't intentionally pushing money into the future for space to win now. That was a mistaken attempt to secure a player that we erroneously thought would still be helping us at the same level as he did in his prime.
No but we push contracts like that all the time. We just don't do it with any sort of end game of actually adding talent. We just move money around and then claim we never have any despite not actually spending hardly any money. They almost use the funny money approach in the opposite direction to make it look like there is just no money to spend.
Staring at Demarcus Lawrence’s $10M salary this year. Move a couple million….It looks like they are just pushing it into 2026 and he gets his money either way. I wish we did stuff like this.