Archer: What should Cowboys do with Carr?

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,018
What should Cowboys do with Carr?

February, 19, 2014

By Todd Archer | ESPNDallas.com


IRVING, Texas -- In the 2012 offseason, Cortland Finnegan and Brandon Carr were the top two cornerbacks in the free agency market.

The St. Louis Rams signed Finnegan to a five-year, $50 million deal. The Dallas Cowboys signed Carr to a six-year, $60 million deal that voided to five years. The Cowboys wanted the extra year on to help them spread out the cap hit when they restructured his contract in 2013.

There have been recent reports that the Rams will cut Finnegan if he does not take a substantial paycut.

There have been no discussions regarding a paycut between Carr and the Cowboys and don't figure to be.

The situations involving Finnegan and Carr demonstrate the dangers of free agency. There was not a soul who believed the Cowboys made a mistake in signing Carr, who has not missed a game in his career and filled a need as a man-press cornerback.

After two years there has to be some regret. Carr has six interceptions in two seasons. He has had his moments, but it is almost impossible to live up to the contract. The same goes for Finnegan, who is three years older than Carr.

Carr is set to count $12.217 million against the cap in 2014. His play tailed off at the end of the 2013 season, but he was hardly alone on a defense that finished last in the NFL.

While the Rams can save money on the cap by releasing Finnegan, such a move by the Cowboys with Carr would cost them $4.6 million. The only way they could release him this offseason that would make sense would be designate him a June 1 cut and push dead money into 2015. If they do that, then Carr would count $12.15 million against the 2015 cap, which is more dead money in one player than the Cowboys will carry into 2014 with about 10-12 players.

The Rams structured Finnegan's deal differently with a lower signing bonus ($5 million) compared to Carr's ($10 million). Carr's base salary in 2013 was set to be $14.3 million until they turned that into a signing bonus last offseason to create cap space.

It's a tool every team uses to create space. The Cowboys will use it this offseason on Tony Romo and Sean Lee to pick up space. They could create more space by restructuring Carr's contract, but would it be worth it?

They would increase their proration dollars going forward, which would be cap prohibitive in 2015 and beyond.

The Cowboys' best move with Carr this year might be to do nothing at all.
 

dallen

Senior Tech
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
8,466
Nice article...........not!
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,505
Man, no one could have seen this coming.

There has to be some regret giving a non-elite, non-playmaking, above-average CB money like he's one of the best CBs in the game?

No shit!

That money should have been spent on Carl Nicks and we should have signed two mid tier CBs instead. Which is how we should always approach the position.

But some GMs never learn.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,465
This organization is ran by idiots who prioritize CB along with positions like QB, LT, pass-rusher and so forth, I don't have the exact quote but I remember reading it from either Jerry or Stephen not too far back, it's part of the reason why we traded up for Claiborne.

These new-money, redneck pieces of shit prioritize CB much higher than a position like OG or MLB, that is a fact.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,332
The Rams have leverage. They can hit Finnegan up and can absorb the cap hit if he flips them off.

Us? Not so much. Carr is more like a bank for us right now to buy cap space.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
19,449
I wish we could get him to wear Schmitty on the back of his jersey.
 

Angrymesscan

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
3,796
These new-money, redneck pieces of shit prioritize CB much higher than a position like OG or MLB, that is a fact.
To be fair, I'd be willing to bet most teams do.
I'm pretty sure the franchise tag, Avg. Salary, etc. for CB is higher than OG and MLB...
Even the great Tuna considered CB a building block.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,613
These new-money, redneck pieces of shit prioritize CB much higher than a position like OG or MLB, that is a fact.
I think you would be very hard pressed to find a GM in the NFL that doesn't prioritize CB over OG or MLB.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
I think you would be very hard pressed to find a GM in the NFL that doesn't prioritize CB over OG or MLB.
The problem is that you have to be a HOF talent to cover WRs with the rules the way they are these days.

Not a HOF talent? Don't pay the CB. Throw that money into great depth for your DL, rush the passer relentlessly, and take your chances with cheaper CB talent.
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,444
The problem is that you have to be a HOF talent to cover WRs with the rules the way they are these days.

Not a HOF talent? Don't pay the CB. Throw that money into great depth for your DL, rush the passer relentlessly, and take your chances with cheaper CB talent.
Exactly.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,505
The problem is that you have to be a HOF talent to cover WRs with the rules the way they are these days.

Not a HOF talent? Don't pay the CB. Throw that money into great depth for your DL, rush the passer relentlessly, and take your chances with cheaper CB talent.
Uh, right, which is why they aren't worth as much as any other position on defense unless they are Darrelle Revis or Champ Bailey.

Some people can't grasp that fact though, that there isn't $45 million of difference between Brandon Carr and Tracey Porter.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,613
The problem is that you have to be a HOF talent to cover WRs with the rules the way they are these days.

Not a HOF talent? Don't pay the CB. Throw that money into great depth for your DL, rush the passer relentlessly, and take your chances with cheaper CB talent.
Or you get corners that are capable of being ultra physical and let them get physical within the first 5 yards where everything goes. If you are playing off with your corners they are either going to get beat or get penalized in today's NFL.
 
Top Bottom