- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 17,985
Guess we can put him down there with Iamtdg. Except Iamtdg is "actively rooting for it."
Would it make you feel better if I "actively root for it"? Cause thats about as hilarious.
Guess we can put him down there with Iamtdg. Except Iamtdg is "actively rooting for it."
It will be because I think at Romo's age and given his history, he has a big chance of getting hurt again. If they truly want him to be the QB that leads this team, why put him out there so quickly with the back injury history? They did the same shit with his collarbone and look what happened. Oh wait...the xrays showed the collarbone was healed!!!Yeah, that would be hilarious.
No one denied its hard, just that it wouldn't be a "dick move." No one is trying to set Dak up to fail, we are all on the same team here. Romo isn't going back in against Cleveland to make him look good by comparison, it would be because that's whats best for him and the team.I'd say they were pretty tough games given the fact he's a rookie and Romo got the majority of the work with the starting team thruout camp.
Your head is so far up your ass over Dak you can't think straight.
I agree with him, so I guess I'm a joe fan, too.Joe Fan, indeed.
Such a stupid argument. He has shredded everyone. Including a very good Bengals. D.The teams we've played thus far are a combined 9-16. Not exactly a murders row.
@iamtjfI agree with him, so I guess I'm a joe fan, too.
Just to clarify, I don't think anyone in the organization is trying to set Dak up to fail. I think they want to win regardless. Has nothing to do with what game Romo comes back.No one denied its hard, just that it wouldn't be a "dick move." No one is trying to set Dak up to fail, we are all on the same team here. Romo isn't going back in against Cleveland to make him look good by comparison, it would be because that's whats best for him and the team.
You'll get no argument from me.I agree with him, so I guess I'm a joe fan, too.
Geez, who knew that comment would blow up. It was a comment on the fact that Romo is likely healthy for the Eagles game. But instead of having Romo play the Eagles they let Dak fight that one and then give Romo the Browns. Just sort of polar opposites. Eagles have one of the best defenses and the Browns have one of the worst. The Eagles are great at rushing the passer, the Browns are not.Why is that a dick move?
I'd say draft all D side of the ball, maybe pick up a guy to replace Free, pick up a nice b/u QB.Refresher question since were starting to beat a dead horse. Say Romo of old comes back as starter, finishes out this season and all 16 games next season. Romo then retires.
It's 2018 Draft and we have opportunity to draft a legit Round 1 pick QB or high-priced free agent QB. Pull the trigger or bypass it and roll with the 7 games we've seen of Dak?
Trick question, no way in hell Romo is my 2017 starter.I'd say draft all D side of the ball, maybe pick up a guy to replace Free, pick up a nice b/u QB.
I think you gotta stick with Dak as your future guy.
I'm not dissecting it like that.No one denied its hard, just that it wouldn't be a "dick move." No one is trying to set Dak up to fail, we are all on the same team here. Romo isn't going back in against Cleveland to make him look good by comparison, it would be because that's whats best for him and the team.
O he be sneaky chi nezeTrick question, no way in hell Romo is my 2017 starter.
~checks my knees~O he be sneaky chi neze
Would it make you feel better if I "actively root for it"? Cause thats about as hilarious.
Agreed.I'm not dissecting it like that.
Bottom line is I feel like I'm watching the incarnation of Aikman/Emmitt 2...just very excited again about the games.
I just got tired of the rollercoaster ride we get with Romo. And just when he started playing like the QB we always wanted, here came the injury bug. Took a lot of wind out of the sail IMO.
The Romo era in a fucking nut shell and quite ironic given this quote was from a SI that was defending him for the Cowboys collapses.December 2, 2013: Cowboys Quarterback Tony Romo was on the cover the week after he beat the Raiders on Thanksgiving, and were 7-5 leading the NFC East. The story was about how America shouldn't blame him for all of the Cowboys recent collapses. The next week, the Cowboys were destroyed by the Chicago Bears 45-28, although most of the blame for the loss went to the defense. However, the week after was a matchup with the Green Bay Packers, who had to use backup quarterback Matt Flynn with the usual starter Aaron Rodgers out with a broken collarbone. Dallas went up 26-3, and ultimately ended up losing 37-36, with much of the blame going to Romo for his two late interceptions, one of which resulted in the winning score and the other being the game-sealer. After a win in Washington the next week, Romo was ruled out for the final game after an back injury, required surgery. This game against the Philadelphia Eagles would ultimately decide the NFC East. Kyle Orton started, but the Cowboys lost a close one 24-22, ending their season at 8-8 for the 3rd straight year.
That will not happen in Dallas until, if and when Romo returns and begins a performance run.Starters lose their jobs to injuries all the time. Especially at QB.
Then why laugh about it? It would harm the team if that scenario played out. I would hope that everyone wants both Prescott and Romo to play well when they are in the line up. If Romo craters again then it will be a sad day for the team.I'll go ahead and say it...I'm going to laugh like a motherfucker when Romo is in the starting lineup for 2 or 3 games, gets drilled again, anddddd.... is lost for the season.
I'm not wishing it, I just expect it.