It makes it truthful. She absolutely will say anything, and will probably will change nothing which is what makes her far more qualified than a candidate who wants to change a lot of things for the worse.You actually think leaving that last line out makes it any better
If she wouldn't have the chance to reshape the SCOTUS I might agree with you. That alone is enough reason to vote anyone but hillary
Sacrificing all the pawns for the sake of sparing the queen...
And the masses will buy it.....
She has no principals. Her principals at any given moment are whatever will serve herself best. So yeah, wouldn't surprise me at all. Nothing would surprise me about Hilary. I mean she literally had her people working in the Bernie campaign. Do you really think that's as bad as it gets with her?
At this point they probably should have just signed off on Merrick Garland.
Just goes to show the people aren't paying attention to what is being said to them during these speeches. Just mindless morons that cheer on command. There's probably an "Applause" sign that lights up above the stage for them.
I'm pretty sure she says "aren't" there.
I heard we are going to raise taxes on the middle class. I played it 3 times.
That's what the DNC do.
Seems like it might be like an ink blot test, where everyone hears what they want to hear. If that's the case we can assume the crowd thought they heard "aren't" before the cheer.
That's what Republicans used to do to, back when they were a party.
Oh please let this be recent. When was this, because she promised in a debate she wouldn't. She actually chastised Bernie for saying he would raise taxes for the programs he wanted to run. Oh please let this be from today.
They both do, it just now the DNC turn for people to see how dirty and corrupt they are, blow the two party system the F**k up.
Maybe she meant to say aren't but she clearly said are. Maybe she will clarify but until then I heard are and it it very clear. I was shocked when I heard it the first time on the news broadcast.
