Still maintain he's a poor mans Byron JonesWe will be lucky if he is strictly a CB. He's like so uber athletic, he can like, do evrathang. Yet nobody can figure out if he is better on the perimeter or in the middle of the field.
Doesn't matter, Marinelli will figure it out and stuff. His system is so flexible.
He is basically the same guy but he went to FSU and did basically the same shit but has the hype support.Still maintain he's a poor mans Byron Jones
Yea I don't get it either.He is basically the same guy but he went to FSU and did basically the same shit but has the hype support.
About the only edge he has on Jones is that he is more physical.
I can't believe so many people buy he is the best player in this draft.
I can. I've imagined for awhile he would be our pick if available. I just had hopes he'd go to SD or even TN. With a QB going 1 and probably 2, that means Tunsil can fall to SD leaving us Ramsey. fmlI can't fucking believe we're gonna end up with another god damn fucking piece of shit can't force a turnover to save his fucking life corner back.
Mike 'business decision' Jenkins?When it comes to Ramsey, think Mike Jenkins................but better.
~Oriental eyes wide open~
It always seems to be the case that the previous tier ends right above us. If we're 4th the first tier ends at 3. If we're 18th the 2nd tier ends at 16 or 17.When it gets to pick #4, I see Wentz, Goff, Tunsil gone...leaving us with a tier of same-grade prospects (Ramsey, Jack, Buckner, Bosa, Stanley, Treadwell, Elliott). So our #4 might as well be #11, whereas other drafts the Top 5 prospects were in a clear tier higher than the next group of prospects.
If we were to trade, does this lend to us trading down to stay before pick #11 or a steeper drop beyond #11, or no influence?
Yes, yes they are.Most of these GM/ front office types are fraudulent mf'ers. Les Snead looks like the cat who got the cream. If they are all so clever, how come there may be only 2 consistently functional front offices; the Pats and to a lesser extent the Ravens The rest make stuff up as they go along.
There is no way he is a poor man's Byron Jones, that's just ridiculous.Still maintain he's a poor mans Byron Jones
Long Jump.There is no way he is a poor man's Byron Jones, that's just ridiculous.
What does Jones do that is better than him?
Agreed.He is basically the same guy but he went to FSU and did basically the same shit but has the hype support.
About the only edge he has on Jones is that he is more physical.
I can't believe so many people buy he is the best player in this draft.
Basically Terrance Newman 2.0. Able to stick with most receivers but can't make a play on the ball once it's in the air to save his life.Agreed.
I know stats aren't the end all be all, especially in college football, but I still would like to see some big numbers from a DB who's considered a top 5 player because that tells me the guy is a play maker.
If I'm burning a top 5 draft pick on a DB it's because I think the guy has big play potential and has demonstrated that he can make impact plays regularly.
Ramsey hasn't done that.
I have a feeling we're going to draft this guy and to no surprise he'll end up only generating 2 or 3 INTs per year. That's not necessarily a bad thing because obviously despite the low INT numbers he could still provide solid pass coverage. That said, if you're using the #4 overall pick on a player, you want a little more bang for your buck. You don't want to settle for "solid" play. With a pick that high you want an impact player.
Or Woodson 2.0Basically Terrance Newman 2.0. Able to stick with most receivers but can't make a play on the ball once it's in the air to save his life.