Had we signed Murray even at the amount Dallas had offered this deal isn't possible.
Yeah, we could have still done this deal. Regardless, I didn't want Murray at 8 mill per.I disagree.
Nah, that's like work and shit. Just try not to lawyer it up in here too much.
I said it was a topic for another day, but I couldn't help myself. Make it another thread, mr. moderator.
DezWho gets more yards this year -- Demarco Murray rushing or Dez Bryant receiving?
Probably would have worked for 2015, but the O is already paid 13 mil more than the D, and DeMarco's deal only widens that gap.I disagree.
Yeah. That would be good. Rowdy could be next.
What's next?
Spaulding holding up a signed contract?
You haven't heard? She was what sealed the deal.What's next?
Spaulding holding up a signed contract?
Yea although I doubt we bring in another high-priced CB like Carr to replace him when we already have Scandrick and Jones. If Murray had taken the 4/24 contract we probably could've signed Bryant but there is absolutely no way we could've given Murray what the Eagles gave him and given Bryant what we did.Probably would have worked for 2015, but the O is already paid 13 mil more than the D, and DeMarco's deal only widens that gap.
Then 2016 would have been a problem with a similar cap to 2015 yet salary increases to Romo, Bryant, Lee, Bailey, and Smith plus at least 4.5 million of Hardy's 2015 salary from NLTBE's.
They are deficient in defensive talent, need to lock Hardy up, another strong contract on the front four, another at LB, one to replace Carr at CB, and a real safety.
That philosophically leaves Dallas drafting a stud RB every three years and never signing one long term.
Yes. Charlotte.Is that JJ's daughter?
Wha...the skeleton face doesn't make it obvious?Is that JJ's daughter?