Simpleton
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 17,501
True, Maryland as well.If Texas can get a QB they are gonna compete.
True, Maryland as well.If Texas can get a QB they are gonna compete.
How's the team shaping up?True, Maryland as well.
Eh, mediocre, given the brutal schedule next year I'd be happy with 7 wins again.How's the team shaping up?
It's been decent the last few years, the 2012 class would've been about middle of the pack in the Big 10 and 2013 probably would've been one of the better classes in the conference after Michigan and Ohio St. of course. This year is a small class so it's not going to be highly ranked but our biggest need is the OL and we're the leader for a top 10 or so 5 star OT so I can't complain.That is a pretty brutal schedule. Have y'all seen a boost in recruiting due to the move?
I don't think that's too accurate. Mizzou sucked their first year in the SEC too, but turned it around this year with better recruiting (possibly because of the SEC tag) and they have good coaching. aTm turned it around quickly because of Johnny Football. If they had him in the Big 12 this year, they would have been in the Fiesta Bowl, IMO.The SEC is clearly the best conference in many phases of the game. They are no doubt the best in hype. Still, this year they didn't really prove it on the field.
I can't help noticing how mediocre Aggy and Mizzu was in the Big 12 but they are now competitors with the same kids. I know, Johnny Football and all of that but still. Either way it makes the SEC defenses suspect. If its all JF then we have one kid that can move the ball well on the all world defense of the SEC? I think the deal is that the SEC plays basically good defense but a good spread team can move the ball on them just in any other conference.
Final AP Poll
1 Florida State (60)
ACC
Record: 14-0
PV Rank
1
Points
1,500
2 Auburn
SEC
Record: 12-2
2
1,428
3 Michigan State
Big Ten
Record: 13-1
4
1,385
4 South Carolina
SEC
Record: 11-2
8
1,247
5 Missouri
SEC
Record: 12-2
9
1,236
6 Oklahoma
Big 12
Record: 11-2
11
1,205
7 Alabama
SEC
Record: 11-2
3
1,114
8 Clemson
ACC
Record: 11-2
12
1,078
9 Oregon
Pac-12
Record: 11-2
10
974
10 UCF
The American
Record: 12-1
15
959
11 Stanford
Pac-12
Record: 11-3
5
936
12 Ohio State
Big Ten
Record: 12-2
7
816
13 Baylor
Big 12
Record: 11-2
6
778
14 LSU
SEC
Record: 10-3
14
717
15 Louisville
The American
Record: 12-1
18
693
16 UCLA
Pac-12
Record: 10-3
17
632
17 Oklahoma State
Big 12
Record: 10-3
13
598
18 Texas A&M
SEC
Record: 9-4
20
459
19 USC
Pac-12
Record: 10-4
26
299
20 Notre Dame
Division I FBS Independents
Record: 9-4
25
256
21 Arizona State
Pac-12
Record: 10-4
16
255
22 Wisconsin
Big Ten
Record: 9-4
19
245
23 Duke
ACC
Record: 10-4
22
190
24 Vanderbilt
SEC
Record: 9-4
29
117
25 Washington
Pac-12
Record: 9-4
33
109
The case with Mizzu is a myth.I don't think that's too accurate. Mizzou sucked their first year in the SEC too, but turned it around this year with better recruiting (possibly because of the SEC tag) and they have good coaching. aTm turned it around quickly because of Johnny Football. If they had him in the Big 12 this year, they would have been in the Fiesta Bowl, IMO.
As far as SEC D's v the spread, we saw what a legit SEC D does to it in the championship game a few years ago when Auburn beat Oregon. Problem this year was, unlike previous SEC winners, Auburns D wasn't all world. They were below average. But if you give a team a month to prepare with SEC talent and coaching my guess is they can hang with just about anyone and that's why last night went the way it did. That, and Winston was completely overwhelmed for a while and he didn't know how to handle it til the halftime break calmed him down.
Yeah he was pissed becasue the AD made the call. What a joke. Truth be told, the new AD and Strong are hitch at the hip now.Red McCombs blasts the Charlie Strong hire.
This why most people are laughing at Texas. They are dangerously close to being run like the Cowboys. Their boosters are more interested in flash than substance.
BTW, have these yokels ever once stopped to think that Strong is on a similar glide path as Mack Brown and many of the other top coaches in recent years. Mack Brown didn't roll into Texas as the hot, must hire name. He was considered somewhat of an up and comer. Same with Bob Stoops, Jim Tressel and Les Miles to name a few.
So for McCombs and any other booster to get all huffy just because they didn't get a guy like Saban is laughable.
And he wants Gruden instead. Again, these boosters would rather have a flashy name rather than someone who will probably make them better immediately. Gruden hasn't coached in college in well over 20 years and he hasn't coached period in 5 years. But you want that over Strong? Good luck with that.
---------------------------------------------
From ESPN.com
By Max Olson
Longtime booster Red McCombs is not a fan of Texas' decision to hire coach Charlie Strong away from Louisville, calling it a "kick in the face" during a radio interview Monday.
"I think the whole thing is a bit sideways," McCombs said of the selection process during an interview with ESPN 1250 San Antonio. "I don't have any doubt that Charlie is a fine coach. I think he would make a great position coach, maybe a coordinator.
"But I don't believe [he belongs at] what should be one of the three most powerful university programs in the world right now at UT-Austin. I don't think it adds up."
McCombs, the former owner of the San Antonio Spurs, Denver Nuggets and Minnesota Vikings and co-founder of Clear Channel Communications, said on "The Blitz with Dat Nguyen and Jason Minnix" that he was stunned to learn Strong was the choice to replace Mack Brown.
He publicly lobbied last week for Texas to hire former NFL coach and ESPN analyst Jon Gruden.
"I think it is a kick in the face," McCombs said. "Beyond the fact of what actually happened. We have boosters that have a lot of knowledge about the game. When we decided to go get Mack -- from the time we decided to go get Mack to about 30 hours later to have a press conference here and it was done -- we had a lot of input before we went after him.