Melton Signed

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,488
So guards just don't matter is what your saying.
Nope, not what I'm saying. You can say they are the least important position on the OL, arguably. Getting a great player into one of those spots and another long term player into the other would still do good things for the offense, which, despite citing a 5.0 yards per carry, was highly inconsistent.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
121,756
Gee.... we must have had the best OL in the league then.

Wrong.
The OL was playing extremely well at the end of the year. More than well enough for our Sooper Genius head coach to trust them to close out football games.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
121,756
Cowboys Sign Henry Melton

Take heart, Cowboys fans. There is some good news this spring.

Littered amidst the exits of the few exceptional defensive players and the back surgery of your QB who has $42m in dead money on his deal if it doesn't work, is a move that might start turning this defense around.

The Cowboys signed Henry Melton last night to a deal that appears to be a 4-year deal worth $29m, but with only 1-year and between $4-5m guaranteed. The particulars of the deal would certainly be called unique and having as much to do with Melton's knee injury and his pending litigation in Grapevine (which also happens to be his hometown) as it does with his ability.

Let's get one thing straight, I have no idea what kind of a guy he is, and reports of him biting a night-club employee is somewhere between a red flag and another reason why professional athletes should do their drinking at their homes, but I am only here to discuss the football impacts of this signing and will leave the psychological profiles to the field of willing and capable writers.

But, when we sat here a year ago and saw the pending doom on the horizon, one of the pipe dreams that rolled down the hill was looking at the expiration of dominant defensive tackle Henry Melton at the end of the 2013 which would sync up perfectly with the expiration of Jason Hatcher and Anthony Spencer's deals.

Knowing the Cowboys affinity for players from the regional college football powers (if you are a Longhorn, Aggie, Sooner, Ok St Cowboy, Razorback, etc, the Cowboys have watched you closely on Saturdays - this theory is more than a running joke) and their transition to the Bears scheme under Lovie Smith and Rod Marinelli, it all seemed to make sense that target #1 in the spring of 2014 would be Henry Melton. Unfortunately, the Bears, with no cap issues at all, would be smart enough to lock him down and make sure he plays his prime years in Chicago - not just his developmental years.

Well, if his goal was to play in his hometown with his hometown team in 2014, then the incidents of the 2013 season all played perfectly. Because I don't think for a second that Chicago was planning on letting him get away for nothing back in September. But, then his ACL happened which cost him the remainder of the season. I am sure if this was 1994 and we heard about an ACL, we would all be properly freaked, but the way the medical world has shown us that this is no longer a big deal and guys are often back in 8-10 months tells us he is fine - as have all of his exams during this free agency tour.

Then, in December, while unavailable to his team, he had an incident at a Grapevine night club (who knew?) and is going to owe someone a fair amount of money for doing something stupid that may or may not have involved his teeth. I imagine, in light of the Sam Hurd legal issues of 2013, nothing makes the Bears recoil like a nice mugshot and perhaps the conviction to not let this guy get away started to lose steam. ACL and arrest in his walk year? That is the difference between $40m and $4m. And while it can all be made back down the road, he made his bed and now must live in it.

However, if he wanted to play here, and I have no idea if that was his goal, then the waters parted magically to make that happen, because the Cowboys were never in the $40m game. But, $4m? OK, that can happen.

Especially if Jason Hatcher was going to be able to get $10m guaranteed and 4 years/$27m from Washington at the age of 32, right? If you told me I could replace a nice player like Hatcher with a 27-year old I actually like more at a savings or at least similar money, I would have jumped at the chance.

Losing DeMarcus Ware is obviously something you wished to avoid. However, if your plan was to go get Melton, find a short term option on the edge like Anthony Spencer or Jared Allen on a very easy deal, and then consider a 1st or 2nd rounder on yet another havoc causer up front, then you had a reasonable plan in the offseason to rebuild this thing in just a few months.

Let's talk about Melton the player. For me, he is a very versatile player who can do a lot of things. In fact, if you go back to his 2009 draft, he was considered a candidate to move to OLB in a 3-4 and was sort of a find because his college team-mate Brain Orakpo was getting attention out of Austin. They would look at Orakpo on film and Melton, despite playing only a year at DE in college, jumped off the screen and on to the radar.

He was just so quick inside and his ability to chase down plays is exactly what Marinelli and Kiffin stress in their defensive line meetings (click here to read more on that). Look below at #69 who is lined up as the 3-technique and ultimately chases down Russell Wilson in the open field - something that is notable for a defensive tackle:


Now, one thing about Melton should be stated. I think this is obvious with just about every player in NFL history, but based on the attitude of the masses with regards to DeMarcus Ware's 2013, I figure I better state it clearly: Supporting cast matters! Below, you will see Melton throw a center (Geoff Hangartner) out of the way on his way to nailing Cam Newton. Great to see. However, notice that he has Julius Peppers, Lance Briggs, Brian Urlacher, Israel Idonije, Shea McClellan, and Major Wright all occupying blockers on this play, too. While that is not the 1985 Bears, the 2012 Bears still had some decent personnel at times. And that matters. Melton is not doing this himself. So, to add only him and to clean your hands off and act like this is all fixed is ridiculous. I know most of you know this, but sometimes, we need to be careful as to assume it is clear to all. DeMarcus Ware can still play and you will see what he will do with Von Miller on his opposite flank.


Melton is really good against the run as a penetrating force. In fact, there are very few DTs in the NFL that did better than he did in 2012. He is quick and dangerous and gets to plays in the backfield on a regular basis. He shoots that gap and isolates guards in space and beats them regularly. He is a very good player in this setting.

However, he is certainly not big enough to anchor when someone wants to clear him out like Minnesota's Matt Kalil here. This is why 3-technique looks for quick and penetrating, not stand your ground types. You can't have everything there and what Melton has in quickness, he does not have in stoutness. That is fine - your DE and LBs need to clean up a zone play like this. But, it is something to be aware of.


We will certainly visit about what this does for the draft and what this does about targeting a 3-technique which has admittedly been the top priority for 15 months now. They have one and they have a very good one. This is a very nice piece of business because the risk factor is incredibly low if they do not like how things go in 2014, they walk away with no dead money and no regrets. I don't know how this can be positioned as anything but a fantastic signing.

Will it make them a power on defense? Of course not. In fact, losing Hatcher and adding Melton likely can at best be a "break even" from a season to season perspective. But, getting younger and replenishing on good contracts is what this is all about. They still have time to do more in free agency (I think Spencer can be had at a very similar price on a 1-year deal) and then go invest in defensive help up high in the draft. Add that to getting Bruce Carter and Morris Claiborne up to their skill levels (which is what coaching is all about) and you can see how the Cowboys should have a reasonable bounce back defensively in 2014.

This is a very nice piece to add and to think it would have never been possible had he not had his incident in Grapevine sure puts an odd spin on the arrest. The Cowboys got their top offseason priority target and they didn't pay much to do it?

Pinch yourself.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,127
I am a hoping they don't take Lewan off the board because of his legal issues.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
Gee.... we must have had the best OL in the league then.

Wrong.
Suddenly you're against the idea that the line had an impact on the offense because it makes your favorite idiot head coach look bad. I don't know how inconsistent they were in other games, but in the Packers game they only had 2 runs for under 4 yards. That's pretty damned consistent. Garrett loses games from not running the ball because he wants to win "his way" just like Jerry. And, just like Jerry, he's about .500 for his career.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,488
Suddenly you're against the idea that the line had an impact on the offense because it makes your favorite idiot head coach look bad. I don't know how inconsistent they were in other games, but in the Packers game they only had 2 runs for under 4 yards. That's pretty damned consistent. Garrett loses games from not running the ball because he wants to win "his way" just like Jerry. And, just like Jerry, he's about .500 for his career.
Who is turning this into a discussion about Garrett? This thread has nothing to do with that.

All I'm saying is, the guard play was not "excellent" -- it was average. Leary in particular tailed off dramatically by the end of the year, though conversely, Tyron Smith was dominant by that point. And Bernadeau is just a guy, that's all he is now and all he'll ever be.

And we would be well rewarded by investing into better players at those positions, is all, as well as RT since you have no idea which Doug Free is gonna show up.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
Who is turning this into a discussion about Garrett?
Several of us who noted that yards per carry were high for this team for the first time in forever, disputing the notion that we got the 'same results' with a solid OL as we got from a terrible one. Even the best line in the league couldn't make up for a head coach refusing to run the ball and thus limiting the offensive line to being at best half as much use to the offense as it could be.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
119,730
Several of us who noted that yards per carry were high for this team for the first time in forever, disputing the notion that we got the 'same results' with a solid OL as we got from a terrible one. Even the best line in the league couldn't make up for a head coach refusing to run the ball and thus limiting the offensive line to being at best half as much use to the offense as it could be.
Smitty can't stand to admit that the line wasn't the problem with us not running last year.

Garrett to the death.

Now, he will come back with "They just weren't great inside last year" even though we ran up the middle very well last year.

Get off his jock, Smitstile.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,416
Murray had literally the highest YPC in the league for guys with over 200 carries, of course he only carried the ball 217 times because our play caller is a stupid fuck, so there's that.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,488
Several of us who noted that yards per carry were high for this team for the first time in forever, disputing the notion that we got the 'same results' with a solid OL as we got from a terrible one. Even the best line in the league couldn't make up for a head coach refusing to run the ball and thus limiting the offensive line to being at best half as much use to the offense as it could be.
Ok... the guards still weren't excellent and we'd still be even better on offense and a lot more consistent if we improved our guard play.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
119,730
Ok... the guards still weren't excellent and we'd still be even better on offense and a lot more consistent if we improved our guard play.
And if we improved our coaching.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,488
Smitty can't stand to admit that the line wasn't the problem with us not running last year.

Garrett to the death.

Now, he will come back with "They just weren't great inside last year" even though we ran up the middle very well last year.

Get off his jock, Smitstile.
I have no idea how this turned into a Garrett referendum, I didn't even bring him up.

All I pointed out was that the guards were not great.

I guess if I point out our DTs aren't great, that means I'm stumping for Monte Kiffin?
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
119,730
I have no interest in having that debate again right now.

C-rock is wrong, however, when he says our guard play was "excellent."
You're wrong when you try to say that our coaching (NOT OUR OL) wasn't a HUGE reason why our running game sucked last year. Even though it didn't.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
119,730
I have no idea how this turned into a Garrett referendum, I didn't even bring him up.

All I pointed out was that the guards were not great.

I guess if I point out our DTs aren't great, that means I'm stumping for Monte Kiffin?
Our OL was fine last year. Above average, actually.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,488
You're wrong when you try to say that our coaching (NOT OUR OL) wasn't a HUGE reason why our running game sucked last year. Even though it didn't.
I did not once say that in this thread. I am discussing personnel only.

Our OL was fine last year. Above average, actually.
I'd say it was about average. Based on the strength of the tackles and center, mostly. The guards were not great.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
119,730
I did not once say that in this thread. I am discussing personnel only.



I'd say it was about average. Based on the strength of the tackles and center, mostly. The guards were not great.
They were damn sure good enough, and to your not saying it in this thread, you have intimated it plenty in other threads.
 
Top Bottom