Jerry Jones rambles on about loss

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
ARLINGTON, Texas -- Owner and general manager Jerry Jones bristled when asked about Jason Garrett's job security after the Dallas Cowboys blew a 23-point lead in the second half of Sunday's loss to the Green Bay Packers, saying it was "not appropriate" to discuss the issue after one of the "hardest losses that I've experienced."

Jones added that it'd be a "bad mistake" to leap to any conclusions based on his unwillingness to directly address the subject on Sunday, when the Cowboys blew a chance to reclaim possession of first place in the NFC East.

Jones gave Garrett a vote of confidence during the Cowboys' bye week last month, guaranteeing his head coach's return in 2014. He expressed displeasure when asked if that commitment had wavered in the wake of two straight losses that dropped Dallas to 7-7.

"Let me just say this: I'm clear and I don't choose to talk about that or talk about several things about the franchise right now," Jones said. "This is not appropriate to talk about it right now. We've just had a loss.

"Are you going to be back? Are you going to be back? Are you going to be back? Each one of you guys going to be back?" Jones added, pointing to individual reporters. "I'm going to be back. So will everybody else be back that's in [the Cowboys' locker room]? Everybody that's eligible and has got a contract."

The Cowboys are 28-26 during Garrett's tenure as coach, which began when Wade Phillips was fired midway through the 2010 season. Dallas went 8-8 the last two seasons and is in jeopardy of missing the playoffs for the fourth consecutive year, which would be the franchise's longest postseason drought since 1986-90.

Jones, who has hired seven head coaches since buying the Cowboys in 1989, has changed his mind on a coach's job security in the recent past. He was adamant that he wouldn't fire Phillips in midseason but reversed course after the Cowboys were blown out by the Packers to fall to 1-7.

Yet, Jones indicated Sunday that he didn't feel a need to state that his long-term commitment to Garrett remained firm.

"I was firm for one night at that time and that doesn't call for me having to be firm every morning I get up," Jones said. "So I was real firm then, so take that to the bank. Just take that to the bank. I'm not going to sit here and every time I see you guys ask whether I'm firm or not. We can all play that game."

Jones acknowledged that the Cowboys' 37-36 loss to the Packers on Sunday, when Green Bay scored 20 points in the fourth quarter and Dallas quarterback Tony Romo was intercepted twice in the final three minutes, was one of the "hardest losses that I've experienced." This came on the heels of a 45-28 blowout loss to the Chicago Bears on Monday night, when the Dallas defense didn't force one punt.

"It is at those particular times that you ask that," Jones said, referring to questions about Garrett's job security. "Don't in any way interpret in any way my refusal to get involved in that kind of discussion here tonight with anything different about me and Jason's future. That'd be a bad mistake to think anything is different."

Told that he was being given a chance to slam the door on speculation, Jones said that wasn't necessary.

"I don't need a chance," Jones said. "I slammed that door back here, when was it, four weeks ago. That door was slammed. I don't need another chance. And y'all shouldn't ask for one every time you see me under any circumstances, whether we've had a bad practice or whether we've had, as we had today, a real disappointment. That's not accurate, that's not accurate at all.

"And we've got a lot of work to do here as you can see. We've got a real challenge ahead of us. This is a bitter, bitter disappointment to lose this game right here in our stadium, and we've got an opportunity to sweep the East by playing the Redskins and by playing the Philadelphia Eagles [in the final two weeks]. We'll start with the Redskins, and if we do we'll win the East. That was our first goal.

"Then y'all will be seeing me and asking me if I'm giving him a raise, an extension."
 

skidadl

El Presidente'
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Messages
11,888
Sounds like Jerry is firmly in control for the foreseeable future.


Merry Christmas.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,789
Absolute worst case scenario is we miss the playoffs and Garrett comes back anyway.

I seriously don't know if I can take it at that point.
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
50,298
It doesn't even matter if Garrett comes back or not.
 

E_D_Guapo

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
3,158
It doesn't even matter if Garrett comes back or not.
Of course it doesn't but he has done absolutely nothing to warrant keeping his job. Nothing. He has failed as a head coach in Dallas. His Ivy League education that impresses Jerry so much clearly hasn't helped him elevate this team and it isn't going to get any better with the aging, overpaid corps of this team of perennial losers.
 

UncleMilti

This seemed like a good idea at the time.
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
17,986
JERRY IS SHOWING US!!!
 

Plan9Misfit

Appreciate The Hate
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
5,924
It seems like he suffers the worst loss of his career each and every week. And because it's true. We have the most incompetent coaching staff in the history of this team (yes, worse than Campo), so it only stands to reason that we get more and more creative in each week's loss. Fuck this team and the losers in charge of it.
 

jootep

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
604
Why can't someone just run up to Jerry during one of these press conferences Jack Ruby style.
 

Bluestar71

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
602
It doesn't even matter if Garrett comes back or not.
You're right of course, but I'm ready for a new guy to come in and screw up in new and refreshing ways. Watching Garrett do the same dumb shit game after game is becoming unbearable.
 

Bob Roberts

Professor StinkFinger
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
3,023
I just can't stand Garrett's stupidity and incompetence. I can't stand to look at his face anymore. I know a new coach won't fix anything overall, but as long as I don't need to see Garrett's face ever again, that's a win.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
"Then y'all will be seeing me and asking me if I'm giving him a raise, an extension."
No, Jerry, no we won't.

I don't care if we bring back Campo now, get this fucking soulless ginger off the sideline
 

Plan9Misfit

Appreciate The Hate
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
5,924
I just can't stand Garrett's stupidity and incompetence. I can't stand to look at his face anymore. I know a new coach won't fix anything overall, but as long as I don't need to see Garrett's face ever again, that's a win.
I'd rather get a new face here so we can make different mistakes rather than literally repeating the same fucking ones week in and week out. Garrett's incompetence and inability to stop fucking things up is mind boggling. The guy has no business being a head coach. The very fundafuckingmental aspects of the game are beyond him. Things like: run the fuckig football to kill the clock when you have a lead. How fucking stupid is this guy?
 

Plan9Misfit

Appreciate The Hate
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
5,924
No, Jerry, no we won't.

I don't care if we bring back Campo now, get this fucking soulless ginger off the sideline
Campo was a better coach. He had fewer financial resources, vastly inferior players, no QB (Aikman missed 7 games of Campo's first year as coach and retired after that), was in cap hell, and no first round draft pick for two of his three seasons as coach, and faced better competition in the division. Garrett has the luxury of a shit division, has it fucking gift wrapped three years in a row, and tanks, anyway.
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
50,298
I'm hoping for the 5-11 years. That's when there might be hope of change.

We we haven't hit bottom yet, record-wise.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
Campo was a better coach. He had fewer financial resources, vastly inferior players, no QB (Aikman missed 7 games of Campo's first year as coach and retired after that), was in cap hell, and no first round draft pick for two of his three seasons as coach, and faced better competition in the division. Garrett has the luxury of a shit division, has it fucking gift wrapped three years in a row, and tanks, anyway.
Feh. Campo's poodleness is why we ended up with such poor personnel. Any other coach would have flipped over a table after the move to draft Carter.
 

Plan9Misfit

Appreciate The Hate
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
5,924
Feh. Campo's poodleness is why we ended up with such poor personnel. Any other coach would have flipped over a table after the move to draft Carter.
You saw Garrett's lack of reaction when we passed on Floyd, right? You can't blame Campo for Jerry being an imbecile.
 

UncleMilti

This seemed like a good idea at the time.
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
17,986
Why can't someone just run up to Jerry during one of these press conferences Jack Ruby style.
:lol


No one would stop them, either.
 
Top Bottom