1500 Year Old Bible Claims Jesus Christ Was Not Crucified – Vatican In Awe

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,570
1500 Year Old Bible Claims Jesus Christ Was Not Crucified – Vatican In Awe

Much to the dismay of the Vatican, an approx. 1500-2000 year old bible was found in Turkey, in the Ethnography Museum of Ankara.




Discovered and kept secret in the year 2000, the book contains the Gospel of Barnabas – a disciple of Christ – which shows that Jesus was not crucified, nor was he the son of God, but a Prophet. The book also calls Apostle Paul “The Impostor”. The book also claims that Jesus ascended to heaven alive, and that Judas Iscariot was crucified in his place.

A report by The National Turk says that the Bible was seized from a gang of smugglers in a Mediterranean-area operation. The report states the gang was charged with smuggling antiquities, illegal excavations, and the possession of explosives. The books itself is valued as high as 40 Million Turkish Liras (approx. 28 mil. Dollars). Man, where is the Thieves Guild, when you need them?

Authenticity

According to reports, experts and religious authorities in Tehram insist that the book is original. The book itself is written with gold lettering, onto loosely-tied leather in Aramaic, the language of Jesus Christ.

The text maintains a vision similar to Islam, contradicting the New Testament’s teachings of Christianity. Jesus also foresees the coming of the Prophet Muhammad, who would found Islam 700 years later.

It is believed that, during the Council of Nicea, the Catholic Church hand-picked the gospels that form the Bible as we know it today; omitting the Gospel of Barnabas (among many others) in favor of the four canonical gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Many biblical texts have begun to surface over time, including those of the Dead Sea and Gnostic Gospels; but this book especially, seems to worry the Vatican.




The Catholic Church wants in

What does this mean to Christian-derived religions and their followers? Quite a tight spot. The Vatican has asked Turkish authorities to let them examine the contents of the book within the Church. Now that the book has been found, will they come to accept the it and its evidence? Will they deny it altogether? Call it a “Muslim lie”, as did the “Truth” Magazine, in 2000?

To many, this book is a beacon of hope, that believers soon realize that the object of their adoration is arbitrary; and that all text, especially religious text, is subject to interpretation.

What does this mean to atheists/agnostics/secular thinkers? Is the text real? Fake? Does it matter? Hopefully, this news inspires the religious to ask questions, instead of pointing fingers or believing anything blindly.

Please, don’t go poking fun or tossing around the “I told you so!”s. The biggest danger of faith is when people believe what they want to believe, defending against any and all evidence; especially when that evidence revolutionizes their foundation from the ground up. And the biggest culprit to that danger is the ego trap: rejecting/criticizing others, for being unlike you.

For centuries, the “defense” of blind faith has driven nations to war, violence, discrimination, slavery and to become the society of automatons that we are today; and for just as long, it has been justified with lies. If you know better, act like it.

This article originally appeared on Sons on the Pyre

Read more at http://higherperspective.com/2014/05/1500-year-old-bible-claims-jesus-christ-crucified-vatican-awe.html#lI3k7oYOiZ5d8YoD.99
 

Kbrown

Not So New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
2,155
The Gospel of Barnabas has been around since the '80s and is filled with errors and anachronisms. This kind of thing pops up every decade or so (Vatican STUNNED!!!), but I am sure this will be the real deal this time.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,112
:unsure

Let's do this?
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,112
Let's do what? Talk about a Muslim Propaganda article?

Hold on, I'll go find the counterpoint from CatholicWorldNetDaily.com.

I swear, it's legit!
It was a joke.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
I hear the man who published the article is a cop that owns a pit bull.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,112
I'm a pit bull owner that is not a Christian that also appreciates what cops do for society.

Bring it.
 

skidadl

El Presidente'
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Messages
11,888
I'm a pit bull owner that is not a Christian that also appreciates what cops do for society.

Bring it.
So you are a guy that is going to hell after a pitbull chews your face off and a cop fails to save you.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,112
So you are a guy that is going to hell after a pitbull chews your face off and a cop fails to save you.
That's low, man. Real low.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,789
The Gospel of Barnabas has been around since the '80s and is filled with errors and anachronisms. This kind of thing pops up every decade or so (Vatican STUNNED!!!), but I am sure this will be the real deal this time.
According to Wikipedia the gospel of Barnabas has been around much longer than that - centuries, in fact - and contains so many anachronisms that it likely originated in the middle ages, not biblical times. That would of course make it inauthentic.

I think what would be significant about this find in Turkey is that it would date the gospel of Barnabas much older than most experts currently believe (at least 1500 years, much closer to the time of the canonical gospels. Still after the council of Nicea I believe, but well before Muhammad was born, which would make its prediction of Muhammad's coming significant in its own right). However, it appears (also according to Wikipedia) that this manuscript found in Turkey does not contain the gospel of Barnabas at all, but rather random canonical gospels.

That's my understanding of this.



http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabas
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom