- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 119,697
Not concerning education. That's a states issue. Or it is supposed to be at least.Do you really not understand how this works?
Let me ask this question, does Obama speak for you?
Not concerning education. That's a states issue. Or it is supposed to be at least.Do you really not understand how this works?
Let me ask this question, does Obama speak for you?
Correct.As an aside, the Constitution gives the federal government no say in education, so he probably shouldn't be speaking on this issue at all.
That has nothing to do with you proclaiming Patrick speaking for the whole state.Not concerning education. That's a states issue. Or it is supposed to be at least.
I explained myself in the very next post.That has nothing to do with you proclaiming Patrick speaking for the whole state.
Using that logic Obama speaks for the entire U.S., right?
Better that way than by shooting up their schools...I don't doubt for a second that these kids are having gender issues but they often come across as giant attention seekers. Like OMG almfo these people are focused on me and I love it.
Fair point.Better that way than by shooting up their schools...
Yeah, no one would expect any less from you. My 13 year old daughter would certainly balk at a mannish woman walking into a restroom with her. Not because of fear mongering, but because at 13 she is just coming into her own and comfort and privacy are an issue with her. F Obama and all of you like him who think that a person with a penis should be allowed to go into the same restroom as her. That is BS.I would blame the fear mongers on the other side of the issue.
No jackass, that is what this last portion of the thread has been devoted to. A male being allowed to use female restrooms because they feel and identify as a woman. Get your head out and pay attention.Except that nobody is pushing for that agenda.
It's just you being over the top as usual.
There's an obvious gap between our perspectives. You believe trans people aren't the gender they claim to be. I believe that they are the gender they claim to be. Because of this difference, none of what I say makes sense to you, and none of what you say makes sense to me. We're on an idealogical Tower of Babel.Yeah, no one would expect any less from you. My 13 year old daughter would certainly balk at a mannish woman walking into a restroom with her. Not because of fear mongering, but because at 13 she is just coming into her own and comfort and privacy are an issue with her. F Obama and all of you like him who think that a person with a penis should be allowed to go into the same restroom as her. That is BS.
No jackass, that is what this last portion of the thread has been devoted to. A male being allowed to use female restrooms because they feel and identify as a woman. Get your head out and pay attention.
YOu and Jiggs gotta quit with the biblical references because you are both doing it out of sarcasm and insult, not sincere understanding or belief. Some here take honest offense to that. The fact is, a person that has a penis is a man, regardless of what he thinks, feels or believes. Unless and until that person with a penis alters that physical state, he is a man. The only way that does not make sense is to the delusional and mentally ill or someone that just wants to be contrary. I know which Jiggy is, and you?There's an obvious gap between our perspectives. You believe trans people aren't the gender they claim to be. I believe that they are the gender they claim to be. Because of this difference, none of what I say makes sense to you, and none of what you say makes sense to me. We're on an idealogical Tower of Babel.
Take it easy, man. The Tower of Babel is a pretty common allusion.YOu and Jiggs gotta quit with the biblical references because you are both doing it out of sarcasm and insult, not sincere understanding or belief. Some here take honest offense to that. The fact is, a person that has a penis is a man, regardless of what he thinks, feels or believes. Unless and until that person with a penis alters that physical state, he is a man. The only way that does not make sense is to the delusional and mentally ill or someone that just wants to be contrary. I know which Jiggy is, and you?
Probably old people that think they are young and deserve to go to kindergarten.I wonder what the next silly ass law that's going to cause a bunch of shouting and get struck down by federal courts will be. We're kind of running out of people to pick on.
Since we seem to be big on tackling non-existent problems, probably so.Probably old people that think they are young and deserve to go to kindergarten.
If you say so.I explained myself in the very next post.
When have I ever used a biblical reference?YOu and Jiggs gotta quit with the biblical references because you are both doing it out of sarcasm and insult, not sincere understanding or belief. Some here take honest offense to that. The fact is, a person that has a penis is a man, regardless of what he thinks, feels or believes. Unless and until that person with a penis alters that physical state, he is a man. The only way that does not make sense is to the delusional and mentally ill or someone that just wants to be contrary. I know which Jiggy is, and you?
I don't believe Fort said the law had anything to do with altering the physical state. He said until that happened there was no actual change to the person.When have I ever used a biblical reference?
And the law that is being advocated for has nothing to do with altering the physical state it is what the person was born as.
Talk about needing to pay attention.