- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 27,145
Yeah....I would have have been insufferable.I seriously thought Wilson was going to keep it off the zone read and run it in for the TD. I could not have handled the Wilson lovefest that would have followed.
Yeah....I would have have been insufferable.I seriously thought Wilson was going to keep it off the zone read and run it in for the TD. I could not have handled the Wilson lovefest that would have followed.
Brady as GOAT is rather sickening too, especially since it should've been his 3rd SB loss.I seriously thought Wilson was going to keep it off the zone read and run it in for the TD. I could not have handled the Wilson lovefest that would have followed.
I can deal with that...he made some great throws tonight when it counted and deserves the accolades.Brady as GOAT is rather sickening too, especially since it should've been his 3rd SB loss.
10 years without a Super Bowl? Dynasty? Nope.Sustained excellence...kind of like the Spurs. This is a dynasty for sure, to have the opportunities to win and the regular seasons they have, I see it as a dynasty.
I'll argue it. Early 2000's was a dynasty. This has little to do with the other. Brady and Belichick are all-timers. Who else is on this team that was on the others?Yeah, and I can't imagine how anyone can argue that.
Yep. A dynasty is not going to win every year, but they have a chance to. Hell, they won 11 games with Cassell. No one is close during this time.10 years without a Super Bowl? Dynasty? Nope.
They are totally classless. Pete has always been like that and much of their team has apparently taken on his personality. The last few years I have tended to pull for them through the season only because of wanting a team to knock off the 49ers. But other than that I do care for them one way or another. But the do have some very unlikeable players.Seattle showed me quite a bit tonight...the Baldwin ridiculous celebration, Sherman calling out Revis into the camera, and the nonsense at the end. Classless.
The Baldwin thing was baffling...this is a guy who went to Stanford and he pretends he is taking a shit with the football. I don't understand that at all.They are totally classless. Pete has always been like that and much of their team has apparently taken on his personality. The last few years I have tended to pull for them through the season only because of wanting a team to knock off the 49ers. But other than that I do care for them one way or another. But the do have some very unlikeable players.
Sherman went to Stanford too and while he may be intelligent he's a thuggish dbag too.The Baldwin thing was baffling...this is a guy who went to Stanford and he pretends he is taking a shit with the football. I don't understand that at all.
The 71 and 77 Cowboys were completely different teams, tooNot a dynasty to me. Their first 3 were. This one is different. Same coach and QB. And 45 different guys.
Yankees of 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000 is a dynasty. Their win in 2009 is not included. Some of the same guys were there, but only a few. 9 years between World Series. Pats went 10 between Super Bowl wins.
I hear you Carp, a dynasty isn't going to win every year, but they're not going to go 10 years without a championship.Yep. A dynasty is not going to win every year, but they have a chance to. Hell, they won 11 games with Cassell. No one is close during this time.