Newt
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 1,148
I want to agree with this, I would love to think that we have enough for sight to say, "hey, lets sign this guy, then if we get to the draft and one of the top running backs is on the board but there is still a defensive player that we really like too we aren't forced to take the running back."The McFadden signing frees us up to not have to be so locked into a RB at 27. I really don't think they signed him with the intention of him being the primary back. Stephen had those numbers showing the decline of RBs at McFadden's age, so he is clearly just a part of the RB puzzle.
I would still have a problem if we passed on Gordon because we were banking on McFadden though. The only bright side is a deep running back class, but we got used to the idea of a stud running back last season and to go back to running back by committee would be a mistake IMO. If we can get a solid d-tackle I wouldn't have a problem pushing RB to the third round, I just have no idea what will be available at 27.