Smitty
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 22,526
I'd prefer if she was the JFK of our time.
I'd prefer if she was the JFK of our time.
Yeah, Trump has 0% chance.Keep in mind that Hillary is as much of a hawk as Lindsay Graham or John McCain. So I'd expect a lot of soft support from the Republican establishment, and enough dark money to outspend Trump 5 to 1.
Hillary was gifted too, no way some backwater governor with a history of infidelity and looming accusations of draft dodging becomes a two term president without Hillary at his side.Nixon was a gifted politician who went off track once he got power. Once you start covering your tracks and lying any man can really lose it. He finally spun out of control trying to control information at all cost. He want nutzo.
Show me where this is true. He states he takes no donations so he will not be obligated to anyone. I don't need to debate the other stuff.LOL You know he does collect donations and spends it on the campaign. He has raised over 15 million in donations/Pac money and spent 35 mill of his own money. His campaign is also 35 million in debt
Besides his name recognition he has had unprecedented coverage from the National Media.
Name recognition and MSM exposure have more to do with his status in the race. He is a mess on Policy (he has none), or some altruistic idea he is funding his campaign himself which isn't true.
Rule #1: Donald Trump liesShow me where this is true. He states he takes no donations so he will not be obligated to anyone. I don't need to debate the other stuff.
Well that's real proof.Rule #1: Donald Trump lies
Hillary is gifted in her own way but Nixon was pretty damn craft. He was a gifted leader of men that ended up getting twisted even more over time. He became so controlling that he lost his mind IMOHillary was gifted too, no way some backwater governor with a history of infidelity and looming accusations of draft dodging becomes a two term president without Hillary at his side.
Also let's be clear Nixon sabotaged peace talks in Vietnam before he became president. Nothing Hillary had ever done comes close to the that.
If you can't find proof of one of Donald Trump thousands of lies, then you're actively avoiding it. I don't feel inclined to show you proof that the world is round or that the sun is yellow either.Well that's real proof.
Yeah, I agree with that. I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary does the same thing, I thought you were saying Nixon wasn't corrupt before he took office.Hillary is gifted in her own way but Nixon was pretty damn craft. He was a gifted leader of men that ended up getting twisted even more over time. He became so controlling that he lost his mind IMO
I'm not going to argue the level of corruptness between those two. That's asinine.
For once take a sensible approach to a statement. The issue I raised was about campaign funds and who supplied them. One poster stated he didn't fund his campaign and I asked him for proof. You supplied a statement saying he lies as proof. My good sir this isn't a statement of proof this is a personal sentiment of your feelings. I have already said I am not interested in a Trump debate. Stick with the issue of your proof about the campaign funds please because I am not interested in a debate about him.If you can't find proof of one of Donald Trump thousands of lies, then you're actively avoiding it. I don't feel inclined to show you proof that the world is round or that the sun is yellow either.
For once take a sensible approach to a statement. The issue I raised was about campaign funds and who supplied them. One poster stated he didn't fund his campaign and I asked him for proof. You supplied a statement saying he lies as proof. My good sir this isn't a statement of proof this is a personal sentiment of your feelings. I have already said I am not interested in a Trump debate. Stick with the issue of your proof about the campaign funds please because I am not interested in a debate about him.
Thank you. Are there any numbers on this regarding the "donate" link?
Yeah. I think this is probably part of the 7.5 million.
And still none of that is legitimate thinking because the majority of Democrats are voting for her and that number is rising.I mean my prediction would be that Hil beats Trump but like I said, I'm not going to write Trump off this time.
And I say that about Hilary and Democratic Supporters because I saw a socialist candidate push her to the limit. That alone should tell you how not on board the party is. I've seen the hate and disdain Dems have shown towards Hil during the primaries.
By the way, the debates are going to be really entertaining. Hilary gives Trump a lot of material. It's going to get really ugly.
And none of that answers the question of why she is still leading the Democratic race in popular votes and regular delegates.Trump had 12 people in the race with him at one time. Rubio and Bush are still getting votes.
Her campaign is weak and she is a weak candidate. She had every advantage going into this election and has struggled.
Almost all Super Delegate support from the moment she announced
Non Stop Media coverage far more than her opponent, second in the entire cycle to only Trump
She had the media saying she was the winner from Iowa on (because of prematurely adding in super delegate votes)
She has adopted much of her opponents rhetoric
This is like 2000, Democrats nominate a weak candidate and lose. Then proceed to blame others for their failure. Nader voters didn't lose 2000 for Gore, A weak candidate lost the election. 300k Democrats voted for Bush in Florida alone. Hell I did in PA.
Nominate a weak establishment candidate, even against a moron like Trump or either one of the other two idiots on the GOP side, and the Democrats will lose.
It is if you do not want to know the truth.