BipolarFuk
Demoted
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 11,464
You know what. This man puts his money where his mouth is. Right out of his own pocket. Who else in the entire history of Presidential candidates can say that?
I think Trump has dominated a party for all the same reasons he'll be dominated in the real election. Because the radicalized right wing of the Republican Party has pushed out any form of moderate, and the Republican establishment hadn't put forward a worthwhile presidential candidate.I don't even know anymore. I never though Trump had a prayer of getting this far. Besides, Hilary is a total dumpster fire of a Democratic candidate so it gives him a chance.
Agree with second part and disagree with the first. Trump is not appealing to radical conservatism (aside from fringe white supremacists who are very few). He's appealing to people who rightly feel disenfranchised by our current process. Unfortunately he's the wrong horse for those people, seeing as he's an un-presidential phony.I think Trump has dominated a party for all the same reasons he'll be dominated in the real election. Because the radicalized right wing of the Republican Party has pushed out any form of moderate, and the Republican establishment hadn't put forward a worthwhile presidential candidate.
I think this is more about what you want then actual reality. Hilary is a candidate that most people feel has been forced down their throat for two elections now and most Democrats wanted nothing to do with her. Not this freight train that you want her to be that will just roll the election.I think Trump has dominated a party for all the same reasons he'll be dominated in the real election. Because the radicalized right wing of the Republican Party has pushed out any form of moderate, and the Republican establishment hadn't put forward a worthwhile presidential candidate.
Hillary is coming in with the momentum of a freight train, as the presumptive 2016 nominee since 2008. She's practically an incumbent. Yeah, she had a hard fought primary with Sanders, but NY ended decisively. She comes out looking like a clear victor, Meanwhile the GOP primary will be fighting Trump tooth and nail possibly after the bell and through an excruciating convention. The GOP looks desperate, disorganized, and weak.
Pretty much all the problems that plagued the post Johnson democrats are in full display in the Republican Party, they're base is divided and they have no organizational control of their party. It's hijacked, and they're going to have lost every undecided voter with this pathetic sideshow.
I'd prefer if she was the JFK of our time.I think this solidifies Hillary as the Nixon of our time. Winning by default while the other party is in shambles.
Don't get me wrong, she would have been beaten by a more charismatic candidate, but her primary process has been a lot easier on her than the sideshow has been on any Republican. Republicans have burned far more bridges than the primary polling has indicated. There's a reason why they call polite language "politically correct" because it protects politicians from alienating people. The GOP candidates have managed to alienate a lot of people.I think this is more about what you want then actual reality. Hilary is a candidate that most people feel has been forced down their throat for two elections now and most Democrats wanted nothing to do with her. Not this freight train that you want her to be that will just roll the election.
Then why is she leading in the popular democratic vote?I think this is more about what you want then actual reality. Hilary is a candidate that most people feel has been forced down their throat for two elections now and most Democrats wanted nothing to do with her. Not this freight train that you want her to be that will just roll the election.
I mean my prediction would be that Hil beats Trump but like I said, I'm not going to write Trump off this time.I believe she has had more people vote for her than Trump.
Which is why I compared her to Richard Nixon.She's a greasy politician. Let's be real here. A total sell-out but that's par for the course with both of hear parties.
Nixon was a gifted politician who went off track once he got power. Once you start covering your tracks and lying any man can really lose it. He finally spun out of control trying to control information at all cost. He want nutzo.Which is why I compared her to Richard Nixon.
John Oliver debunked this about 2 months ago.You know what. This man puts his money where his mouth is. Right out of his own pocket. Who else in the entire history of Presidential candidates can say that?
Off the top of my head? Steve ForbesYou know what. This man puts his money where his mouth is. Right out of his own pocket. Who else in the entire history of Presidential candidates can say that?
LOL You know he does collect donations and spends it on the campaign. He has raised over 15 million in donations/Pac money and spent 35 mill of his own money. His campaign is also 35 million in debtYou know what. This man puts his money where his mouth is. Right out of his own pocket. Who else in the entire history of Presidential candidates can say that?
Trump had 12 people in the race with him at one time. Rubio and Bush are still getting votes.Then why is she leading in the popular democratic vote?
What you are saying is definitely not actual reality.
I agree she is not a freight train but she is also not what you are making her out to be.
I believe she has had more people vote for her than Trump.