Jerry is a monster, but not that bad.We've missed out on so many quality coaches over the years while we've dicked around with Garrett. Aryans is another one. The Cardinals don't even have a QB but they're prepared and the players buy in.
Tomlin should have challenged then.Looked like a bad call to me. Wheaton stayed in bounds the whole time.
The Panthers were also offsides on the play as well.Even if he was out, how was that not PI or illegal contact?
Better overall record gets us home field over the Panthers.Lots of Steelers fans in here...screw you guys.
Exactly right.I won't complain about that win.
Did the Rams give that away? Yes, just like we've given away double digit leads for inexplicable losses far too often too.
So I'll just be happy we were the team on the other end of a debacle for once.
So while the Rams gave us a hand, we still had to score on the other end to capitalize, and we did just that.
And him and Ryan were my choices. But Jerry never would have hired him. Wade was perfect because his age made it easy to make Garrett the coach in waiting.Jerry interviewed Rivera.
That as an impressive a stat as you'll see for a QB.Here's a pretty good stat that they threw out on Mike and Mike.
Russell Wilson is 7-0 against Brady, Brees, Manning, and Rodgers.
In those games his TD to INT ratio is 14-1.
Any game can be tricky in professional sports. Too many variables to factor. Matchup is a pretty good barometer but even that can be difficult. The gambling profession does the most research but even their odds get distorted when they start laying off bets. I just go with who seems to have the best personnel and leave it at that. My track record leaves a lot to be desired.I guess I was a little off annointing the Panthers last night. Cam looked sore after a couple hits and that OL was not very good last night. They are still good though.
Why are QB comparison stats impressive? They never face each other on the field. They face each opponent's defense, not the opposing QB. Shouldn't they provide the statistical standings of the defenses they've face rather than the QBs from the opposing teams?Here's a pretty good stat that they threw out on Mike and Mike.
Russell Wilson is 7-0 against Brady, Brees, Manning, and Rodgers.
In those games his TD to INT ratio is 14-1.
Those are all quality teams led by quality QBs. I find it impressive.Why are QB comparison stats impressive? They never face each other on the field. They face each opponent's defense, not the opposing QB. Shouldn't they provide the statistical standings of the defenses they've face rather than the QBs from the opposing teams?