jsmith6919
Honored Member - RIP
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2013
- Messages
- 28,407
Thats right but he hasn't been tarnished by bad coaching since he took the job again. So the current job holder may not be doing great but he isnt hurting either. Production continues.Romo was productive well before Wilson got re-employed.
Would you say Romo had his best year ever this last season?Thats right but he hasn't been tarnished by bad coaching since he took the job again. So the current job holder may not be doing great but he isnt hurting either. Production continues.
Just not getting in the way is pretty much what he is doing. To me, he's a worthless figurehead.Thats right but he hasn't been tarnished by bad coaching since he took the job again. So the current job holder may not be doing great but he isnt hurting either. Production continues.
Statistaccly no. Did Dallas as a team have a better record yes.Would you say Romo had his best year ever this last season?
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he had the best QBR of his career.Statistaccly no. Did Dallas as a team have a better record yes.
You dont attribute the style of play and the mix as having part of the success. That extends past the QB.Just not getting in the way is pretty much what he is doing. To me, he's a worthless figurehead.
On most NFL teams, the QB coach is a pretty significant assistant.
Linehan steps in and in one year accomplishes more with Romo than Wilson ever has and he does not even carry the title.
Basically what you are saying is that Romo could be just as productive with or without him.Thats right but he hasn't been tarnished by bad coaching since he took the job again. So the current job holder may not be doing great but he isnt hurting either. Production continues.
His highest completion percentage and QBR of his career this year.I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he had the best QBR of his career.
Probably true but statistically he threw less and overall passing production was probably less than in the past. The game results were obviously better.I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he had the best QBR of his career.
Dick LeBeau comes to mind.You know another hint he may not be much of a coach...
Seven years he's been at the same spot, we've changed OC's never even considered him, never has he been on interviews with other teams...
How? He was the DC in Pitt for years.Dick LeBeau comes to mind.
I dunno. Ask Angry guy. He referenced longivity.How? He was the DC in Pitt for years.
Right...but he asked why Wilson was not elevated to coordinator, either in Dallas or elsewhere, while Lebeau was the coordinator in Pitt.I dunno. Ask Angry guy. He referenced longivity.
Thats right he did. Wilson at same job long time, LeBeau at same job long time. What does it mean? I dunno.Right...but he asked why Wilson was not elevated to coordinator, either in Dallas or elsewhere, while Lebeau was the coordinator in Pitt.
If you are on your Kindle, press the off button. Lap top, slowly close it.Thats right he did. Wilson at same job long time, LeBeau at same job long time. What does it mean? I dunno.
Big difference between a position coach and a coordinator.Thats right he did. Wilson at same job long time, LeBeau at same job long time. What does it mean? I dunno.
That wasnt the point. Being on a job for a long time doesn't define a persons abilities good or bad. LeBeau is an example of a person that stayed on a job for years without being promoted but he was apparently well regarded. Angry guy used Wilson longivity as a position caoch for a long time as a bad connotation. I used LeBeu as not necessarly so.Big difference between a position coach and a coordinator.
Again, huge difference between a coordinator and a position coach. Only thing Lebeau could be elevated to is HC...which he actually was before. So it was a poor comparison.That wasnt the point. Being on a job for a long time doesn't define a persons abilities good or bad. LeBeau is an example of a person that stayed on a job for years without being promoted but he was apparently well regarded. Angry guy used Wilson longivity as a position caoch for a long time as a bad connotation. I used LeBeu as not necessarly so.