Genghis Khan
The worst version of myself
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 37,711
Arkin. Damn auto-correct.
Hell yeah, and he could plug the void at DT as well.I'm being 100% serious with this question, given a month of training camp at the age of 42 could Larry Allen start for us?
I'm not asking because I think it's an option obviously, just to illustrate how shit our OG situation is.Hell yeah, and he could plug the void at DT as well.
Bring him back, Jerry! Announce it at the HOF induction!!!11!!!
He couldn't be any worse than our current guards, that's for sure.I'm being 100% serious with this question, given a month of training camp at the age of 42 could Larry Allen start for us?
That might be a bit of a stretch.He couldn't be any worse than our current guards, that's for sure.
Pretty much. When it is obvious that DL schlubs can come in and make their presence known before the ink on their contract is dry you know it is BS.If we sign Waters then we know any positives we are hearing about young guys like Leary, Kowalski, and Arlin is pretty much BS.
Yeah, I've been saying that too, if all the chips fall our way on the OL (Free bounces back, Frederick is an instant quality starter, and Leary can take over one of the OG spots and play solidly) then that turns the OL from desperate weakness to merely not great but survivable.We really need Leary to step up and win a spot, if he can upgrade one of the OG positions over last year, and Free has something of a bounce back year (shouldn't be hard considering a bounce back would mean not playing like absolute shit) we could be ok.
So an O-line with quality starters every where except one guard spot is considered survivable? (Assuming Tyrone Smith doesn't become better then just a quality LT) I think most O-lines have at least one weak player but maybe I am wrong.Yeah, I've been saying that too, if all the chips fall our way on the OL (Free bounces back, Frederick is an instant quality starter, and Leary can take over one of the OG spots and play solidly) then that turns the OL from desperate weakness to merely not great but survivable.
But that's unlikely to all pan out in our favor.
Agreed, I'm hoping it's real but I'm definitely not banking on it.The reports early have been good on Free from what I have read. Sounds like he lost a little weight, regained some athleticism, and is having a solid camp so far. Of course all that could be bullshit and the only reason he looks any better is because he is going against Ben Bass and other turds.
I wouldn't consider a shaky Free and an uncertain Leary "quality." It's just better than what we had before. Those guys even as vast improvements would be no better than average.So an O-line with quality starters every where except one guard spot is considered survivable? (Assuming Tyrone Smith doesn't become better then just a quality LT) I think most O-lines have at least one weak player but maybe I am wrong.
So an O-line with quality starters every where except one guard spot is considered survivable? (Assuming Tyrone Smith doesn't become better then just a quality LT) I think most O-lines have at least one weak player but maybe I am wrong.
Free's always managed to look competent in practice and camp because his biggest problems are with full-speed pass rushers and generating power in the running game.The reports early have been good on Free from what I have read. Sounds like he lost a little weight, regained some athleticism, and is having a solid camp so far. Of course all that could be bullshit and the only reason he looks any better is because he is going against Ben Bass and other turds.
It's really quite impossible to argue this OL is any good, so luckily for me these conspiracy theories mean very little.He's hedging so that he'd still have something to blame when Garrett fails.
Overrated. Pink Floyd was just as good without him.