Yeah, they didn't plan for the FG and had to rush everyone on the field. That might not bode well for McCoy.This could be the lowest point in Chargers franchise history.
Will work on that bro. LolCujo has nothing to say about the Cowboys and this historic run we're having.
Suddenly, just five words to call the Packers to get the fuck out here, Flair-style.
Post more, seriously.
1. Boozeman, Skidadl, and Ed guapo.@Cujo
1. Favorite 3 posters
2. Favorite non-football thread you read
3. You start Dak or Romo in Week 17
4. Favorite fast food hamburger
@BipolarFan SIT DOWN. NOT YOUR TURN
Ok, ok, ok...your next 3 favorite posters.1. Boozeman, Skidadl, and Ed guapo.
2. Anything about Ron Paul.
3.Dak 1st 3 quarters. Romo 4th.
4. Whataburger.
That's 3 posts in one day. Probably been a couple of years since I've had that many.
He's not even active. Maybe he said sucks?33-0 Pats over the Jets.
Why wouldn't the Jets put in Hackenburg?
Is he is shit bad as we all thought?
Yuck... I sell.You're starting a franchise. Which QB you take - Tannehill (fully recovered), Blake Bortles, Tyrod Taylor, or Andy Dalton?
Should Dak see limited action until the playoffs rather than risk. Carr like injury?The Pats route just got easier. Carr. Done.
That is just awful for them.The Pats route just got easier. Carr. Done.
why only Dak? In 2007, TO got his high ankle sprain in Dec and partially caused our loss to NYG. Are rea we the same team if Fredrickson or Sean Lee or Zeke get injured?Should Dak see limited action until the playoffs rather than risk. Carr like injury?
Because it's the obvious question the media is asking.why only Dak? In 2007, TO got his high ankle sprain in Dec and partially caused our loss to NYG. Are rea we the same team if Fredrickson or Sean Lee or Zeke get injured?
For QB, question is if you start Sanchez or Romo. If Romo gets injured playing in the next two games, our backup dropoff is significant.
. You bench one, you bench them all.Because it's the obvious question the media is asking.