lostxn
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 7,874
It's a 1 year prove it deal. I don't have a huge issue with it but I know nothing about the player.And if he doesn't, $1M is flushed down the toilet.
It's a 1 year prove it deal. I don't have a huge issue with it but I know nothing about the player.And if he doesn't, $1M is flushed down the toilet.
He did have his best year last year. As for the 1 million, the vet minimum for a 7 year guy is 915000.
G GS T R Yds Avg TD
16 10 69 38 555 14.6 2
15 14 70 39 593 15.2 8
13 0 23 15 317 21.1 3
The first row of stats is Thompson, second is Watkins, third is Butler. Thompson costs 1 million guaranteed while Watson costs 30 million guaranteed.
This is the f'ing market, and all things considered I think we fared a lot better than KC.
There's either room for competition in our WR corps or there isn't. Draft picks are all gambles, and none of them know how to be professionals yet.
This was a very reasonable move.
He's a drop-in replacement for Butler and is competing for a better contract. That's what we need, given we're not going to find a Dez replacement outside of the draft.
I want Ryan Switzer's smug, comfortable ass either transformed into a significant contributor or fucking gone. I want Beasley, Twill, and Dez to raise their ridiculous 8.7, 10.7, and 12.1 YPC's or be gone.
Of course that means better protection, better passing, and better offensive balance.
No, it is a two year deal where if he sucks we wasted $1M.It's a 1 year prove it deal. I don't have a huge issue with it but I know nothing about the player.
Or $500k over 2 years really. That's chicken feed. Let's see how it goes. He can stretch the field. We need that. Not everything has to be the end of the world boozeman. FFS. Considering the money that went to Watkins I'm totally fine with this. Honestly, I would have been fine keeping Butler if he had kept his fucking mouth shut.No, it is a two year deal where if he sucks we wasted $1M.
Everywhere I see says 1 year. 1.5 mil base with 1 mil signing bonus. Isn't that what Wallace got from the Eagles? I'd prefer Wallace.No, it is a two year deal where if he sucks we wasted $1M.
Got to be efficient.I mean, Mike Wallace is way more proven and signed the exact same deal.
He is about to turn 32 though, so I'm sure that isn't efficient enough for these fucks.
So fucking what? That was years ago and he is now 29.This guy is pretty damn fast. He ran a 4.31 forty. That's faster than anyone this year.
I guess I'm the only one excited about this signing.
This allows us to move Lael Collins back to guard.