User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Danielle Hunter Signs Extension

  1. #1
    Senior Member Simpleton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,297

    Danielle Hunter Signs Extension

    5 years, 70 million (14.4 average), 40 guaranteed.

    Seems like a reasonable barometer for Lawrence's deal, although the franchise tag being 17.1 million throws it off a bit.

    I'd sign him to something resembling that Hunter deal right now, if he refuses to budge off of the 17 or so million that he's asking for I'd let it play out. If he comes out and dominates over the first half of the season like he did last year I'd probably just cave and give him the 17 a year.

  2. #2
    One-armed Knife Sharpener Iamtdg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    60,028
    Quote Originally Posted by Simpleton View Post
    5 years, 70 million (14.4 average), 40 guaranteed.

    Seems like a reasonable barometer for Lawrence's deal, although the franchise tag being 17.1 million throws it off a bit.

    I'd sign him to something resembling that Hunter deal right now, if he refuses to budge off of the 17 or so million that he's asking for I'd let it play out. If he comes out and dominates over the first half of the season like he did last year I'd probably just cave and give him the 17 a year.
    Yeah, I'd be happy with that deal. 17 a year is too much right now. Like you said, he comes out on fire and proves he is real deal longterm then I re-evaluate that stance.
    2016 DCC LOTY Fantasy Football Champion

  3. #3
    Administrator boozeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    48,025
    Quote Originally Posted by Simpleton View Post
    5 years, 70 million (14.4 average), 40 guaranteed.

    Seems like a reasonable barometer for Lawrence's deal, although the franchise tag being 17.1 million throws it off a bit.

    I'd sign him to something resembling that Hunter deal right now, if he refuses to budge off of the 17 or so million that he's asking for I'd let it play out. If he comes out and dominates over the first half of the season like he did last year I'd probably just cave and give him the 17 a year.
    It is middle of the pack in terms of what the top DL are getting though.



    He might be looking for more than that, more like what guys like Chandler Jones is getting.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Simpleton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,297
    I'd be ok with 16.5 but I'd hold off and only give it to him if he came out and picked up where he left off last year. If he maintains his 2017 level of play I'd be fine giving him a 16-17 a year deal around midseason.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Cowboysrock55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    23,559
    Quote Originally Posted by Simpleton View Post
    I'd be ok with 16.5 but I'd hold off and only give it to him if he came out and picked up where he left off last year. If he maintains his 2017 level of play I'd be fine giving him a 16-17 a year deal around midseason.
    The fact that Crawford is anywhere on that list makes me want to vomit.

  6. The following user likes this post:


  7. #6
    Administrator boozeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    48,025
    Quote Originally Posted by Cowboysrock55 View Post
    The fact that Crawford is anywhere on that list makes me want to vomit.
    His contract was embarrassingly bad. It still shocks me now. It just goes to show you how poor that decision was in retrospect.

    But yet, he's a "leader" and "versatile". Actually, they have been finding ways to justify that contract for several years.

  8. #7
    Senior Member Genghis Khan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    11,883
    Quote Originally Posted by Cowboysrock55 View Post
    The fact that Crawford is anywhere on that list makes me want to vomit.
    Just focus on what a bargain he is.

  9. #8
    Senior Member Chocolate Lab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,673
    Quote Originally Posted by Genghis Khan View Post
    Just focus on what a bargain he is.
    2014=2009, 2015=2010?

    The Garrett Song

  10. #9
    Senior Member Cowboysrock55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    23,559
    Quote Originally Posted by boozeman View Post
    His contract was embarrassingly bad. It still shocks me now. It just goes to show you how poor that decision was in retrospect.

    But yet, he's a "leader" and "versatile". Actually, they have been finding ways to justify that contract for several years.
    I mean he isn't good at anything but dammit he is versatile!!!!!

  11. #10
    Senior Member DLK150's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    6,480
    That $17M is too much for a guy that has only played one full season out of four for one reason or another. One "breakout" season does not make him elite, IMO.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •