User Tag List

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Dallas - Patriots Trade

  1. #21
    Senior Member mschmidt64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    14,034
    Not a fan of Breeland Speaks, but say that pick is Denarius Senat instead. Senat and Cole Madison might be two future starters on our lines. Is it worth giving them up to have Moore instead of Miller? I don't know.

  2. #22
    Senior Member Cowboysrock55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    23,559
    Quote Originally Posted by mschmidt64 View Post
    Not a fan of Breeland Speaks, but say that pick is Denarius Senat instead. Senat and Cole Madison might be two future starters on our lines. Is it worth giving them up to have Moore instead of Miller? I don't know.
    I think he was basing this off the mock draft they just did on the Cowboys NFL draft show on the dallascowboys.com website. Senat was long gone by then.

  3. #23
    Senior Member Simpleton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,297
    Quote Originally Posted by Genghis Khan View Post
    We are giving up 4 picks and only adding two. I have zero interest in that.

    I get that we're only giving up a 4th and essentially a sixth, but they're still too valuable to me.

    I mean, our starting QB was essentially a fifth and like half our secondary we're 6th rounders so I wouldn't look at them as throwaways.
    If you'd rather not give up a mid-4th and late-5th to move up from 50 to 31 that's fine, I just disagree.

    I'd much rather get a guy like Sutton, Evans, Payne or Wynn at 31 than James Washington, Chark or Nathan Shepherd at 50, and for all the rotational players we've found in the 5th or 6th there are 3-5 times as many guys who washed out.

    Of course the more picks you have the greater the chance that you hit on one of them but there's also the possibility that the front office better parses out who they like rather than just throwing bones like POS Joey Ivie and Jordan Carrell at Marinelli.

  4. #24
    Senior Member lostxn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,469
    Man I posted this same thread on the zone. Amazing how little analysis these folks do. Just knee-jerk "yes" "no" answers with no rationale. This is why I have 113 messages there and 5k+ here.

  5. The following user likes this post:


  6. #25
    Senior Member fortsbest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,087
    I'd do the trade simply because I think there's a better chance of this group hitting at 23 and 31 than the at 50, and the 4 and 5 picks. I know they have been better of late, but they aren't making 10 picks anyway and 2 in the 1st would be greatness.

  7. #26
    Senior Member NoDak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    10,525
    Well, we ended up with two of the guys listed in the trade scenario in LVE and Connor Williams, while keeping the extra two picks which we would have lost, which turned into Dorance Armstrong and Mike White.


    Looks like Jerry knows more about football than you guys after all.


    All kidding aside, if that trade would have went down the only other two guys on that list available were DJ Moore and Hernandez. So it begs the question... Would you be more happy with with those two or LVE, Williams, Armstrong, and White? (yes, I know that only one different pick anywhere in the process would have changed the entire draft.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •