Joe Fan
Brand New Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2015
- Messages
- 1,647
I know, right?I guess the running TD should count against Dak. He didn't pass for a TD there, what a failure.
If it ain't through the air it don't count.
I know, right?I guess the running TD should count against Dak. He didn't pass for a TD there, what a failure.
We could've with Showers, just not with Romo.Again, we don't score that TD on that play without Dak.
So, we couldn't with either?We couldn't with Showers, just not with Romo.
It makes a difference whether you want to admit it or not.
When people argue about things Romo can do that Dak can't do, I point to plays like that read option TD.
It goes both ways. There are things Dak brings to the table that Romo can't do.
Amazing play.T Crawford!!!!
It's comical that we have so many older fans who are old enough to remember the 90s Cowboys winning Super Bowls with a similar amount of production from the QB and running game, yet they aren't satisfied with what Dak is doing.Dude, don't you know that passing TD's count for more points or something?
Scoring 30 points a game isn't that important if you aren't passing into the endzone.
You shut your mouth and wait for the edit.So, we couldn't with either?
If Dak were a #4 overall pick and blue chipper, this wouldn't be a debate.It's comical that we have so many older fans who are old enough to remember the 90s Cowboys winning Super Bowls with a similar amount of production from the QB and running game.
It's like they're completely caught up in fantasy football stats.
I like the new QBR rating. It makes up for a lot of the deficiencies of the standard rating. Of course it's subjective as hell.It's comical that we have so many older fans who are old enough to remember the 90s Cowboys winning Super Bowls with a similar amount of production from the QB and running game.
It's like they're completely caught up in fantasy football stats.