Romo has had 11 season's to win a Superbowl and has never sniffed one. It would take a real Romo homer to believe he would win it this year if Dak doesn't.Worst part about this and it will probably happen, Dallas will lose in the playoffs.
Then we will get people crying that Romo would have made a difference.
Just maddening. This year is what it is.
The thought process defies logic. I would get it if he were even Danny White with three consecutive NFCC losses. He's not.Romo has had 11 season's to win a Superbowl and has never sniffed one. It would take a real Romo homer to believe he would win it this year if Dak doesn't.
The had some blowouts but they also had losses and squeakers. Check the box scores. A third of the games were pretty tight and half were go away wins with the remainder being losses.Your memory must be getting bad. Half the time in the 1990s, I could pass out drunk in the second quarter with the game well in hand and could wake up knowing we didn't blow it. Those games were hardly fight and scrape.
That's the jist of it and why the organization should be ready to make changes if the game it getting away. There is no next week.Worst part about this and it will probably happen, Dallas will lose in the playoffs.
Then we will get people crying that Romo would have made a difference.
Just maddening. This year is what it is.
If we do lose in the playoffs, I'm shutting down every god damn thread on this board that erupts in a Romo could have done it better discussion.Worst part about this and it will probably happen, Dallas will lose in the playoffs.
Then we will get people crying that Romo would have made a difference.
Just maddening. This year is what it is.
Yes , well that seems really fair.If we do lose in the playoffs, I'm shutting down every god damn thread on this board that erupts in a Romo could have done it better discussion.
Funny thing is, Dak has already matched the furthest Romo has ever gone in the playoffs.If we do lose in the playoffs, I'm shutting down every god damn thread on this board that erupts in a Romo could have done it better discussion.
I'm mostly kidding. Mostly.Yes , well that seems really fair.
And, by the numbers, Romo in 2014 had an even better run game than we did this year. Just saying.Funny thing is, Dak has already matched the furthest Romo has ever gone in the playoffs.
But a much worse defense.And, by the numbers, Romo in 2014 had an even better run game than we did this year. Just saying.
We had 18 picks on defense in 2014. That would tie for the league lead this season. It was a much different defense back then but it had it's strengths as well.But a much worse defense.
I don't know about much worse.But a much worse defense.
I haven't checked the stats but I don't think that group led the league in rushing allowed, etc.I don't know about much worse.
Equating a QB's capabilities with his teams deepest progress through the playoffs is what defies logic. It's media thinking and a gross over-simplification. (Good lord if Romo ever had the defenses White did...)The thought process defies logic. I would get it if he were even Danny White with three consecutive NFCC losses. He's not.
We were 8th in rushing yards allowed. Tied for 16th at 4.2 yards per carry.I haven't checked the stats but I don't think that group led the league in rushing allowed, etc.
That defense was in a complete shambles by the playoffs. We couldn't field three competent LB's or two legit safeties.This years defense is better but that 2014 defense was actually not bad at all statistically. Much like this year people just thought it was going to be god awful and were very surprised once the season started.
Not really because Emmitt and Barry had long careers. Emmitt moreso.This is becoming a Barry vs Emmitt debate. "If Romo had Dak's team..." "Emmitt didn't break long runs like Barry did"