- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 120,146
Yeah, and failed to highlight the part that proved you wrong.I only highlighted what taxes they were using.
Yeah, and failed to highlight the part that proved you wrong.I only highlighted what taxes they were using.
No my exact words were that if they had even a small percentage of that they would be flush with cash. Meaning Texas would have a lot more money to add to their budget. Which is absolutely true.You are the one who made the laughable assumption that just a little of the taxes they saved could cover everything they get in federal aid.
I was only pointing out that Texas leads yearly in federal disater declarations, they are consistently at the top of the list.So you're determining annual funding by number of disaster designations?
You must have missed this part for that period of time "Although Texas leads the way in declared disasters during this time period, it lags in total dollars received from FEMA with about $20 million."
http://www.nbcnews.com/business/10-states-most-natural-disasters-6C10088195But how much disaster aid is doled out to the states each year?
It's probably not a surprise to hear that Tornado Alley states require the most federal aid annually. Topping the list is Texas, which has had the most major disasters (88) in the nation since 1953, according to FEMA.
1. Texas
Within the Lone Star State's nearly 267,000 square miles (second only to Alaska in size), at least one major disaster is declared nearly every calendar year. Texas has dealt with tornadoes, floods, wildfires and regular coastal hurricanes. One of the deadliest and costliest in recent decades was Hurricane Celia, which tore up Corpus Christi in 1970. The storm left 13 dead and destroyed millions of dollars' worth of property.
Major disaster declarations since 1953: 86
Ah, so when you say they receive more federal disaster relief then any other State, you didn't mean in terms of money? Because I would think that is the barometer I'd use to judge it.I was only pointing out that Texas leads yearly in federal disater declarations, they are consistently at the top of the list.
http://www.nbcnews.com/business/10-states-most-natural-disasters-6C10088195
I admit I missed that.Yeah, and failed to highlight the part that proved you wrong.
Eva DeLuna Castro, a budget analyst at Austin’s Center for Public Policy Priorities, which advocates for moderate- to low-income Texans, told us Texas started receiving more federal funds in the last decade because of an increase in military spending, tax cuts and tax credits and a modest growth in federal health spending — not to mention a spike in social services and aid every time a hurricane hit.
"Texas is definitely getting back way more than people in Texas are paying in taxes," she said. "So do a lot of other states. Texas isn’t unique in that."
In 2009, most states — there were 45, including Texas — received more than residents paid in taxes. Though no data is yet available, DeLuna Castro said Texas will again receive more than residents paid in taxes in 2010. But by 2011, when stimulus funds dry up, she speculated that Texas will revert to being a "donor state."
Summing up: The figures from our sources show two different trends. On an annual basis between 1981 and 2003, Texas almost always paid more in federal taxes than it got back from Uncle Sam. But since 2003 the reverse has been true, with Texas receiving more than it paid in five out of seven years, which is close to routine.
I admit I missed that.
But that does not change the fact that since 2003 those numbers have reversed.
http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2011/apr/22/rachel-maddow/msnbc-host-rachel-maddow-says-texas-routinely-rece/
What?Ah, so when you say they receive more federal disaster relief then any other State, you didn't mean in terms of money? Because I would think that is the barometer I'd use to judge it.
That was speculation and since the oil crash I don't see how that could be true.
But by 2011, when stimulus funds dry up, she speculated that Texas will revert to being a "donor state."
That would be 5 years ago. So, we apparently back to paying more in than what we get back.
For the exact reason that your article pointed out. Texas has 75 disasters during that period of time while other states had far fewer. But the states that led in actual funding received weren't the ones at the top of that list. It was actually Kentucky, Arkansas and Missouri. Texas is a big state which leads to many disasters but that doesn't mean their disasters actually require a lot of funding.What?
If a state is routinely in top 5 of disaster relief and has the most MAJOR disaster declarations since 1953 it would also stand to reason they have received more federal disaster releief money over that time.
No the initial article had 75 disasters for that one year.For the exact reason that your article pointed out. Texas has 75 disasters during that period of time while other states had far fewer. But the states that led in actual funding received weren't the ones at the top of that list. It was actually Kentucky, Arkansas and Missouri. Texas is a big state which leads to many disasters but that doesn't mean their disasters actually require a lot of funding.
I genuinely don't give a fuck if you believe me, or die of cancer for that matter.
Every bit of that was speculation. There were no numbers to back up what she said in that text. So, you either take it all as speculation or all of it as truth.That was speculation and since the oil crash I don't see how that could be true.
I have not been able to find any numbers since 2012 so it is debatable.
God damn, you need to learn to read. I've already addressed this. Texas colleges' funding only involve a 10% stake from the feds. I'm sure we can make up that 10% fairly easily.Another issue that needs to be looked at is what happens to a school like Texas Tech and other schools that depend on state and federal funding.
You know that money is going to be funneled to UT and A&M before going elsewhere.
What black people do when they don't feel like calling?TEXIT!!
Federal funding is different for each school I have seen figures from 13% to 22%.God damn, you need to learn to read. I've already addressed this. Texas colleges' funding only involve a 10% stake from the feds. I'm sure we can make up that 10% fairly easily.
What black people do when they don't feel like calling?