Well, gender is a construct you see. Your sons wouldn't gravitate toward toy trucks if you hadn't conditioned them that way, and if you suggest otherwise, you are a bigot.
But one of the reasons that the laws to protect trans were created was because of the number of trans people who were harassed or assaulted trying to use their preferred restroom.
Funny enough this is where old feminism's perception of gender really falls by the way side. The basic idea now, as far as I can tell, is that gender is an inherent identity but the expectations of gender are artificial.
I imagine assaulting people and issuing physical threats is already illegal, correct? You seem to be pro-gun, and can probably guess the rest of my point. Like I said, symbolic, asinine laws for the sake of a mistreated group getting to have their "moment."
It depends. If someone thinks they are defending their own privacy there's a different expectation there, I think. I don't think prosecutors or law enforcement would take a case as seriously, absent a law. Their own personal biases could also impact how an assault was handled without clarification. See the "trans panic" stuff I cited earlier. The distinction is important for the people in the bathroom to know that the trans person is acting lawfully and deserves to be treated as any other restroom user.
Brittney Grinner already succeeded at cross gendering. [MENTION=28]Rev[/MENTION]
This is where I very much disagree. Freedom and self responsibility come in play. No matter what we live in a free country where you allowed to behave how you want and not blame other people. I'll cry when it is appropriate or when I feel it is. I've made my own world and I plan to live there. Everyone else has the same responsibility. You can change any of that through making your own legacy. That can be done by having kids, influencing your sphere around you and even social actions. But you are never allowed to do it through law.
I agree that both laws are more symbolic than anything and that for the most part evrything was fine as is.
I agree it should be handled that way but as in other forms of discrimination sometimes certain groups need to be made "legitimate" for authorities to actually protect them.
So now you are belittling posters by asking about their gender associations and saying they need a hug.
That man is scary.
Its "unique" because the left only just now decided that not allowing men with their dicks cut off to use the women's room was discrimination -- but then again they have to come up with a new cause to be outraged about daily or they would be irrelevant. Yeah, I'd say that's fairly unique. It's also not comparable with discrimination against blacks, immigrants, religious minorities, etc, of the past.
total pwnage
Piss off.
And you can't see that this is along the same lines and that it comes as a presidential edict as well? The rest is coming just wait.Here we go again.
And still there has not been a federal mandate of to teach a gay curriculum in schools which is what you were and continue to be wrong about.
It's amazing how confident you are without doing an ounce of research. I provide links for you, with quality scientific data. But you aren't one to let the facts get in the way of a good argument.
Because I can show you pictures of transgender male to females that would make women feel extremely uncomfortable in a bathroom. You're arguing for those transgenders as well.
As a criminal defense attorney, I will confirm this.
Based on this, can't you see a problem with making malleable social theories into standards of ethics and morality?
