How the Dallas Cowboys blew their 2016 draft

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
How the Dallas Cowboys blew their 2016 draft

By Chris Chase Published May 02, 2016
Facebook6 Twitter0 Email Print

Okay, every NFC East team that thinks it had a great draft, step forward.

Not so fast, Dallas.

Despite Jerry Jones believing that taking running back Ezekiel Elliott at No. 4 was a game-changer ("I've had my finest hours in business going against the grain," he told MMQB's Peter King), it's a move only DC, New York and Philadelphia could love. It's yet another example of what the mediocre-to-awful Cowboys of the last 20 years do best: putting star power and skill positions ahead of needs, consequences be damned.


Over the past two years it had looked like cooler, wiser heads had been prevailing in Dallas when they'd been presented with choices between flash and substance. This was most famously shown when the Cowboys passed on Johnny Manziel for some offensive lineman in the 2014 NFL draft, a pick that still annoyed Jerry Jones even after Manziel began his downward spiral in Cleveland. Meanwhile, that offensive lineman, Zack Martin, is now two-for-two in Pro Bowls and has a first-team All-Pro honor as well.

Solid, measured drafting like that would be the key to breaking through and becoming a dominant team in a division that hasn't seen one in a decade. Shoring up an offensive line, however unsexy, is how DeMarco Murray became a star in 2014 and even gave the oft-injured Darren McFadden the second-best season of his career in 2015, much to the delight of his fellow Arkansas Razorback Jerry Jones. The idea of getting another good back is sound: A solid rushing attack helps Tony Romo which helps Dez Bryant and the receiving corps and, thus, goes back to helping the offensive line. Football is all about symbiotic relationships.

Doing the same to the defense - by, say, drafting FSU cornerback Jalen Ramsey or edge rusher DeForest Buckner - could have had the same sort of domino effect. A shutdown secondary could allow Dallas to load the box to stop the run or attack on more blitzes with the knowledge that coverage would be taken care of downfield.

But the lessons Dallas should have learned from the Manziel/Martin situation were already forgotten. Instead, Jones went for a position that has more first-round busts and more late-round successes than any other. It's rare the Cowboys are in a position to draft such a big prospect. After taking Elliott, it might not be long before they're in the same spot again.

Time and time again it's been proven that you don't need a running back in the first round, particularly when you're drafting as high as the Cowboys were. Consider: Only three rushers in the past 20 years have been drafted higher than Ezekiel Elliott. All were expected to change their offensive complexion of their teams and begin new dynasties. Those three players: Ronnie Brown, Reggie Bush and Trent Richardson.

But the high bust potential isn't why the Elliott pick was wrong. (He might be great. Jalen Ramsey might be a bust.) Nor is the fact that running backs rarely (almost never) are the key cog to a Super Bowl title team. (The Patriots won a title with their rushing leader getting 412 yards on the ground. The Giants won their last Super Bowl with Ahmad Bradshaw, who finished the year with 659 yards. Even the Super Bowl teams with the best runners had guys who barely clipped 1,000 yards (Marshawn Lynch being the exception, though he was playing on a team largely predicated on its defense).

The biggest issue is the shifting doctrine of the Cowboys. Dallas drafted for offense, which is fine. Their best-case scenario is, I don't know, Romo, Elliott and Dez Bryant becoming the new triplets and leading Dallas back to the later stages of the playoffs that have been so foreign to the franchise since the days of Jimmy Johnson (and that year Barry Switzer rode his coattails to a title)?

It sounds great. Great passer, great receiver, (theoretically) great runner. Put up four touchdowns per game and run through your schedule to the playoffs. The problem is Dallas's defense has all the trappings of one that might give up a lot of points too. It's not much benefit to score 28 points when you're giving up 31. An offense is only as good as its defense - just ask the Saints.

That's why something King wrote about Jones and the Dallas coaching staff (which are usually just mouthpieces of Jones) was so tremendously "Cowboys": Part of the reason they took Elliott was because they thought his presence would lead to longer drives that would keep the defense off the field. On the whole it makes sense. You want your offense to keep your defense off the field. But, and I'm just spitballing here, if you're worried about your defense being on the field, it's likely because you're worried about your defense in general. In that case, draft defense. Who, worried about their defense, goes offense instead, trusting it to help that defense? It's insane.

There's this new wrinkle - most hilarious of all and also written about on MMQB - that Dallas was trying to acquire another first-round pick (late in the round) to get Memphis quarterback Paxton Lynch, who would then be an understudy to Tony Romo.

The whole thing is played up by Jones like Lynch almost became a Cowboy. In that case, Dallas would have taken a running back at No. 4 when there were a half-dozen other holes to fix and then would have been happy to give away picks to draft a quarterback who wouldn't even play for years.

Only, it didn't go down that way. The Cowboys merely desired Lynch, but not enough to do anything other than blow some smoke, at least according to King's account. Why? The Cowboys lowballed almost every team picking from No. 18 and No. 28 in their "attempt" to get Lynch, offering packages no sane team would take. It's sort of like going into a Hyundai dealership, offering the salesman $11,000 for a Sonata and then, after getting immediately rejected, saying "well, I almost bought a car today."

How bad, truly, could Dallas have really wanted the Memphis QB? Jerry Jones gets what he wants and if he wanted Paxton Lynch, then he'd have gotten Paxton Lynch.

Jones boasts of his risk-taking yet took no real risks, at least in his eyes. To the rest of the NFL, taking a back at No. 4 would be a fireable offense. For Dallas, it's the key to a door they'll never unlock.

How bout them Cowboys?
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
I have my problems with the draft, but assuming the defense will be porous is silly. It'll be the first time Lee and Scandrick are on the field together, barring injury (knock on wood) in 2 years. So I don't know why we're expected to do much worse than 2014 when Lee was missing or 2015 when Scandrick was. Also if we put up 28 points, they're going to make mistakes trying to keep up, and we'll actually get turnovers, unlike last year.
 

Stars

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
1,460
This Chris Chase dude is famous for being hated by everyone. He used to be an elementary school teacher and decided to start writing a sports blog. USA today hired him and he just says controversial stuff to troll people.
 

Bluestar71

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
602
On paper at least this defense is as good as, and probably better, than the one that made do well enough to almost reach the NFC championship game in 2014 so calling the strategy insane defies actual recent evidence to the contrary. This guy sounds like a typical Cowboys hater taking legitimate criticisms and exaggerating them to the point of farce.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,412
All you need to know about this dipshit is that he characterized DeForest Buckner as an "edge rusher".

There is about a 4% chance this shithead knows anything about draft prospects aside from what he hears from Kiper, McShay and Mayock, although to be honest if this idiot is characterizing Buckner as an "edge rusher" I even doubt that he reads/listens to them.

Might as well call Joey Bosa a sideline to sideline LB because he's going to be a 3-4 LB in San Diego.
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
50,293
:lol

i hate jerruh. This article is all about humiliating jerruh. I should love this article.


Instead, I'm all Zzzzzzzzoner in my response and feel like saying, "fuck you, man. Ezekiel for 2,500 yards, 14-2 and Super Bowls. Plural"
 

Joe Fan

Brand New Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
1,647
I remember when Mo Claiborne was supposed to be the second coming of Deion also, some times those "shut down" corners don't exactly work out, and he had nearly 4x as many INTs as Ramsey.

Some times those corners just don't work out either.
 

Plan9Misfit

Appreciate The Hate
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
5,834
I remember when Mo Claiborne was supposed to be the second coming of Deion also, some times those "shut down" corners don't exactly work out, and he had nearly 4x as many INTs as Ramsey.

Some times those corners just don't work out either.
It's an even greater opportunity to bust when teams really don't know if you're a Safety or CB to begin with. And then you tack on the stone hands, inability to create turnovers, and inability to cover TEs, and you have a bust in the making.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,453
On paper at least this defense is as good as, and probably better, than the one that made do well enough to almost reach the NFC championship game in 2014 so calling the strategy insane defies actual recent evidence to the contrary. This guy sounds like a typical Cowboys hater taking legitimate criticisms and exaggerating them to the point of farce.
We went defense heavy in 2015. And hell we really went defense heavy in 2016 too. Our first rounder was offense but then our next 3 picks all went to the defensive side. The problem is that people think that they will get instant results from a draft. As though somehow drafting defense at 4 was going to transform this defense. Rookies just generally don't have that type of impact.

If you want to rebuild the defense through the draft you'll need patience. You'll have to take time for guys like Lawrence, Gregory and Jones to develop into impact players. Idiots like this guy have no idea that most NFL rookies don't do have a real impact on their defense. And I seriously doubt Ramsey is this years Marcus Peters.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
119,695
~flush~
 

DLK150

DCC 4Life
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
8,789
I stopped reading when I got to the part that talked about a "shutdown secondary" because I felt it was better to preserve a few brain cells than continue. This "author" is such a troll.
 
Top Bottom