jsmith6919
Honored Member - RIP
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2013
- Messages
- 28,407
I'm sure Garrett doesn'tYou want your best players to feel like it was their coaches fault and not their own?
I'm sure Garrett doesn'tYou want your best players to feel like it was their coaches fault and not their own?
Personally I want my players taking responsibility for the loss. Because there is always something more that they can do. The dude who is always blaming everyone else for their loss is the guy who gets his ass kicked on most teams.To take it personally that they lost. To believe with all their heart that the ball should have been in their hands.
I don't care if they blame the coaches so long as they keep it between themselves and the coaches.
I want more than a frickin 3rd if I'm coming off of the #4 overall pick. Especially if we're moving far enough down were Lawson becomes a target.modest trade down, pick up Lawson and an extra 3rd
It was a growing experience for Elliott and a mistake he owned.Personally I want my players taking responsibility for the loss. Because there is always something more that they can do. The dude who is always blaming everyone else for their loss is the guy who gets his ass kicked on most teams.
Yep. We typically only get more if people are desperately targeting a QB.By "modest" I mean still picking in the top 10. In the 2012 draft, when Tampa moved back two slots (from 5 to 7), all they got was a 4th rounder from Jax. the only question is whether taking Lawson at 8 or 9 would constitute a reach.
He touched the ball twice in the second half of a game in bad weather that was never more than a 1 score differential.You want your best players to feel like it was their coaches fault and not their own?
We're talking about Tampa, here. Just because they were retarded doesn't mean we should be. The MINIMUM I'd take to move is a 2nd.By "modest" I mean still picking in the top 10. In the 2012 draft, when Tampa moved back two slots (from 5 to 7), all they got was a 4th rounder from Jax. the only question is whether taking Lawson at 8 or 9 would constitute a reach.
Not me, I am not picking Lawson high. His shoulder should be enough of a flag to knock him out of the top half of the first IMO.modest trade down, pick up Lawson and an extra 3rd
I think we can all agree they should have ran the ball more. But maybe what Elliott should have done is taken responsibility for the 2.8 ypc he got on the 12 carries he did have. It's not like he was lighting the world on fire with his carries.He touched the ball twice in the second half of a game in bad weather that was never more than a 1 score differential.
The punter touched it five times.
Granted, if stupid offensive game plans piss him off, this is not the place for him.
I'd rather have a fourth and Elliott then just Elliott. So I can't say there is no way I'd take less then a second. But I also don't care that much about Elliott so I would probably hold out for at least a second even if it meant moving down where I could miss out on Elliott.We're talking about Tampa, here. Just because they were retarded doesn't mean we should be. The MINIMUM I'd take to move is a 2nd.
Well, yeah. I'd rather have a next years seventh and Elliott then just Elliott. And I'm not talking about moving away from just Elliot. I mentioned a group of players I'd be interested in, and wouldn't want to move below that number to do it. It would take a pretty hefty package of picks to get me to drop below that tier.I'd rather have a fourth and Elliott then just Elliott.
Ah makes sense. The more I've thought about it, the more I'm comfortable dropping down closer to 15. I think I like some of these guys in the teens just as much if not more then the guys in the top 10.Well, yeah. I'd rather have a next years seventh and Elliott then just Elliott. And I'm not talking about moving away from just Elliot. I mentioned a group of players I'd be interested in, and wouldn't want to move below that number to do it. It would take a pretty hefty package of picks to get me to drop below that tier.