User Tag List

Page 64 of 73 FirstFirst ... 14546263646566 ... LastLast
Results 631 to 640 of 721

Thread: The Outrage Thread

  1. #631
    Senior Member BipolarFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Up my ass
    Posts
    8,417
    Quote Originally Posted by Iamtdg View Post
    Same as yours, most likely.

  2. #632
    Senior Member L.T. Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    15,587
    Quote Originally Posted by Iamtdg View Post
    Same as yours, most likely.
    Since Day One

  3. #633
    Senior Member BipolarFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Up my ass
    Posts
    8,417

  4. The following user likes this post:


  5. #634
    Senior Member bbgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,565
    liberals, God bless em


  6. #635
    Administrator boozeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    45,679
    Dr. Phil guests claim host, show staff enabled drug use ahead of tapings
    By Sasha Savitsky | Fox News

    Dr. Phil and his show staff have been accused of procuring drugs and tempting guests with alcohol ahead of show tapings that focused on addiction.

    In a scathing expose by STAT and the Boston Globe released Thursday, several former guests accused the TV doctor of egging on their addictions and even helping them acquire drugs.

    Dr. Phil, whose real name is Phil McGraw, declined to comment to STAT and the Boston Globe. A rep for the star did not immediately return Fox News' request for comment.

    Todd Herzog appeared on the "Dr. Phil" show in 2013. He was battling alcoholism but insists he was not intoxicated when he arrived at the show's studio.

    However, the 2007 "Survivor" winner said he discovered vodka in his dressing room, where he was left alone, and proceeded to drink an entire bottle. He alleges he was then offered a Xanax to "calm his nerves" by a show staff member.

    Martin Greenberg, a psychologist who is the director of professional affairs for the "Dr. Phil" show, denied Herzog's claim and told STAT and the Boston Globe that guests have never been provided with drugs or alcohol.

    Greenberg labeled the claims in the expose "absolutely, unequivocally untrue."

    "I had been drinking and took a Xanax, which I've never taken Xanax before in my life, and I know that can be a deadly combination so why it was given to me, I don't know," Herzog said.

    Meanwhile, the mother of 28-year-old Kaitlin from Lansing, Mich., alleges a staffer for "Dr. Phil" helped Kaitlin, who was then pregnant, get heroin ahead of her 2016 show taping.
    When Kaitlin and her mother, Joelle King-Parrish, arrived in Los Angeles, Kaitlin was going through withdrawal so King-Parrish says she asked a show staff member for help and was told to take Kaitlin to the hospital.

    After four hours went by without medical attention, Kaitlin refused to remain at the hospital, and King-Parrish, concerned for Kaitlin's unborn baby's health, asked a show producer for help. King-Parrish claims the show producer joined them and they headed in a cab together to Skid Row.

    Kaitlin's excursion to purchase heroin on Skid Row aired on "Dr. Phil." McGraw later scolded King-Parrish on the show for taking her daughter to buy drugs instead of taking her to the hospital.

    "There was a lot of manipulation telling us what to say, telling us how to act, telling us what to do," King-Parrish explained. "I was told do not question anything he is saying or he could not give her the help she needed."

    Another guest, Jordan, who appeared on the show in 2012 also claimed a show producer told her to "go to Skid Row" to buy heroin.

    Jordan and Kaitlin's families told STAT and the Boston Globe the two women are still addicted to opioids. They were sent to rehab following the show, but their families say the treatment was insufficient.
    "It was a complete bust," Jordan's aunt Marianne Smith said. "Didn't help at all. Just ratings for him. People are going to him, like us, with serious, life-threatening problems looking for help. It just doesn't happen."

    Kaitlin left rehab and Greenberg noted, "The treatment facility is not a locked ward, and she is a hard-core heroin addict. That's what they do."

    He said Jordan, like other guests, "had medical supervision" during her time on the show.

    But family members of two additional "Dr. Phil" guests said no medical support was provided to them during the time surrounding their show tapings, and one guest claims "Dr. Phil's" staff helped to procure drugs for her.

    However, one of Dr. Phil's former guests credits the show with saving her life.

    Niki Dietrich was an eight-months pregnant heroin addict when she appeared on "Dr. Phil" last year. She said she was sent to an Origins treatment facility after appearing on "Dr. Phil" and is now sober.

    "That was like a miracle," Dietrich said of her experience. "They hooked it up, for sure. The 'Dr. Phil' show, I have nothing bad to say about that experience."
    And Greenberg lauded "Dr. Phil" for providing guests with treatment.

    "Addicts are notorious for lying, deflecting and trivializing. But, if they are at risk when they arrive, then they were at risk before they arrived," Greenberg stated. "The only change is they are one step closer to getting help, typically help they could not have even come close to affording."

    -----------

    I don't like Dr. Phil as I think he is full of shit.

    But are you fuckin' serious?

    Errbody is a goddamn victim.

  7. #636
    Senior Member jsmith6919's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    7,443

  8. #637
    Senior Member 2233boys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,500
    Quote Originally Posted by Cowboysrock55 View Post
    Isn't that being a little nit picky? I mean who really gives a shit. CHIP was funded in time before any of the states ran out of funding (It's a state run program through federal funding is my understanding) In terms of scale CHIP impacted a very small percent of the population while the tax reforms impact almost everyone.

    I'm glad it got done though. If there is any segment of the population that deserves health care no matter what it is children. They can't care for themselves at that point in life and they haven't lived long enough to make decisions on their own that caused them health problems. CHIP is just an expansion on medicaid really.
    No I don't think it is nitpicking, when funding ended in early fall and they had to try and do one or two repeals of the ACA and the tax bill. The bottom line is they aren't representing the people, they are more interested in representing their donors.

    We need to have changes to Congress Ethics, so they can't vote on anything they directly benefit from. As it is, as long as one other person is affected adversely or positively their rules allow them to vote. Could end lobbying as we know it, and make our government actually representative again. Wouldn't cost the taxpayers a thing either.

  9. #638
    Senior Member 2233boys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,500
    Quote Originally Posted by 2233boys View Post
    No I don't think it is nitpicking, when funding ended in early fall and they had to try and do one or two repeals of the ACA and the tax bill. The bottom line is they aren't representing the people, they are more interested in representing their donors.

    We need to have changes to Congress Ethics, so they can't vote on anything they directly benefit from. As it is, as long as one other person is affected adversely or positively their rules allow them to vote. Could end lobbying as we know it, and make our government actually representative again. Wouldn't cost the taxpayers a thing either.
    You know what pisses me off even more, is that when they are discussing the Budget funding again next week, long term funding for Chip hasn't been discussed, but a Border wall and Daca reforms have.

  10. #639
    Senior Member BipolarFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Up my ass
    Posts
    8,417

  11. #640
    Senior Member bbgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,565
    Why did people think they could openly operate a marijuana businesses when it's clearly illegal under federal law? It doesn’t matter that states legalized it. I'm not a lawyer, but even I've heard of the Supremacy Clause.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •