Archer: How Brock Osweiler could influence Cowboys' QB decision

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,041
How Brock Osweiler could influence Cowboys' QB decision
10:43 PM ET
Todd Archer
ESPN Staff Writer

IRVING, Texas -- In 2012, the Denver Broncos drafted Brock Osweiler in the second round to be the quarterback of the future behind Peyton Manning, who did not play a snap the previous season with the Indianapolis Colts because of a serious neck injury.

Over the course of the next four seasons, Osweiler played in 21 games, threw for 2,126 yards with 11 touchdown passes and six interceptions. He started seven games in 2015 after Manning went down with a foot injury and had a 5-2 record.

Manning returned late in the season, took over in the playoffs and ended his career with a victory in Super Bowl 50.

The Broncos are not going to see the Manning-to-Osweiler handoff at quarterback because the Houston Texans swooped in and signed Osweiler to a $72 million contract.

So the Broncos got nothing for their investment in Osweiler. They developed him for somebody else.

As the Dallas Cowboys get ready for the upcoming draft, that is something else to consider when wondering whether they will take a quarterback in the first, second or whatever rounds.

Will the Cowboys be developing that quarterback for somebody else?

If you want to believe Jerry Jones’ premise that every move the Cowboys will make in the draft will be with the idea Tony Romo will be the quarterback for the next four or five years, then it won’t matter. If the Cowboys take a quarterback at No. 4 overall, they could guarantee themselves a five-year run with that pick, be it Jared Goff or Carson Wentz.

That would also require them to pick up a fifth-year option on a quarterback with relatively little experience should Romo play 2016-18.

If the Cowboys choose a quarterback in the second or third rounds, they would be locked into a four-year deal and could face a dilemma similar to what the Broncos had with Osweiler.

He was good in his seven-game run as Manning’s replacement, but was he so good as to command $18 million per season? The Texans, starved for a quarterback in a different way than Denver, believe so. The Broncos are now starved for a quarterback because Manning retired and Osweiler left, but they can also look at the Vince Lombardi Trophy they just earned as validation or a way to buy some time.

The last thing the Cowboys should want is to draft a quarterback early, get a little taste of what he can do, have some hope for the future and then see him play elsewhere after spending the pick, the money and the time in developing the player.

Osweiler’s decision to leave Denver gives the Cowboys something else to think about as they evaluate the quarterbacks for this draft.

:window
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,637
It sure as shit shouldn't. If the Broncos wanted to keep him it would have been really easy. The Redskins had no problem keeping the QB that they sat and developed. This is just stupid.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,440
Osweiler left because they wouldn't or couldn't pay him.

Jesus, these writers will invent any old bullshit to manufacture a story.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
Full spin mode already...Jesus this draft is going to suck
 

mcnuttz

Senior Junior Mod
Staff member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
15,777
Jerry: Your move, fanboys!
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,078
Todd Spagnola on the case
 

bbgun

please don't "dur" me
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
23,437
Didn't even have to look at the byline to know who wrote it. Archer is neck and neck with Spags in the hackery department. This is just a trial balloon to curb fans' expectations.
 

Stars

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
1,460
The Broncos are not going to see the Manning-to-Osweiler handoff at quarterback because the Houston Texans swooped in and signed Osweiler to a $72 million contract.

So the Broncos got nothing for their investment in Osweiler. They developed him for somebody else.

As the Dallas Cowboys get ready for the upcoming draft, that is something else to consider when wondering whether they will take a quarterback in the first, second or whatever rounds.

Will the Cowboys be developing that quarterback for somebody else?
I see Dallas and their sycophant journalists are still spinning this tired meme year after year. Unbelievable.
 

22cowboysfan22

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
2,987
Saying that Denver got nothing for their investment in Osweiler is insane. Without a solid backup, they don't get a first round bye in the playoffs and don't even make it to the Super Bowl.
 

VA Cowboy

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
4,710
Romo turns 36 next month. In 4 years Romo will be 40. If we draft a QB and let him walk after 4 years it's because he didn't pan out, not because we developed him for someone else. If he develops he should be starting here before that time. No way Romo stays healthy and playing at a high level for 3-4 more years.

So there is zero reason to not draft a franchise QB now if one is available when we pick.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,204
So there is zero reason to not draft a franchise QB now if one is available when we pick.
There's the big question. Why isn't the general world scrambling to trade up with Tennessee for the top pick?

If Luck were available, you know they would be.

The answer is because Wentz and Goff aren't anywhere close to Luck.

No matter how much we want them to be.

And we want them to be.

Desperately.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,637
There's the big question. Why isn't the general world scrambling to trade up with Tennessee for the top pick?

If Luck were available, you know they would be.

The answer is because Wentz and Goff aren't anywhere close to Luck.

No matter how much we want them to be.

And we want them to be.

Desperately.
Haha so they are either a once in a decade QB prospect or not worth a top pick.
 

VA Cowboy

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
4,710
There's the big question. Why isn't the general world scrambling to trade up with Tennessee for the top pick?

If Luck were available, you know they would be.

The answer is because Wentz and Goff aren't anywhere close to Luck.

No matter how much we want them to be.

And we want them to be.

Desperately.
Everyone has said there is no Luck type QB in this draft. But Wentz or Goff could be longterm quality starters. The issue we've been saying with this draft is not only isn't there a once in a decade type QB but guys like Bosa, Buckner, Ramsey, Jack, etc aren't top end franchise caliber DL, DB or LB's either.

As for Archer's article, it's about being hesitant on drafting a QB if he end up walking in 4 years and you developed him for someone else. That won't be the case. The issue with drafting Wentz or Goff should only come down to the evaluation process and whether we feel one will end up being a quality starter in the league.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,698
There's the big question. Why isn't the general world scrambling to trade up with Tennessee for the top pick?

If Luck were available, you know they would be.

The answer is because Wentz and Goff aren't anywhere close to Luck.

No matter how much we want them to be.

And we want them to be.

Desperately.
They really don't have to be at Luck' s level now. Luck was drafted to start. He was advanced for a rookie. Goff or Wentz have the tools and potential. They will just need to be honed and seasoned. They will have that luxury with Dallas theoretically.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
There's the big question. Why isn't the general world scrambling to trade up with Tennessee for the top pick?

If Luck were available, you know they would be.

The answer is because Wentz and Goff aren't anywhere close to Luck.

No matter how much we want them to be.

And we want them to be.

Desperately.
No one was scrambling to get to the top of the 2005 draft either. Yet here we stand with Smith and Rodgers making the playoffs every year for 5 and 8 years respectively.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,637
No one was scrambling to get to the top of the 2005 draft either. Yet here we stand with Smith and Rodgers making the playoffs every year for 5 and 8 years respectively.
And we don't know that yet anyway. We could see teams scrambling for a top pick. Heck we may see teams with top picks not want to trade down either. Everyone keeps telling me what a stud Tunsil is. Why would a team needing a LT want to move down away from him?

But honestly saying the QBs aren't that good because one will be available at 4 is like the Micky Spags rule. "If they are so good, then why are they available." You just can't win with that logic. Sometimes the chips just fall right and you have the opportunity at 4 for a QB that most years you wouldn't.
 
Top Bottom