Archer: Should Cowboys make Julio Jones-type trade?

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,014
Should Cowboys make Julio Jones-type trade?
7:00 AM CT
Todd Archer
ESPN Staff Writer

FRISCO, Texas -- In 2010, the Atlanta Falcons had the best record in the NFC, finishing 13-3, but they lost to the Green Bay Packers in the divisional round of the playoffs.

Believing they were close to becoming a Super Bowl team, Falcons general manager Thomas Dimitroff made a bold move, trading up 21 spots in a deal with the Cleveland Browns to draft wide receiver Julio Jones and pair him with quarterback Matt Ryan.

The man Dimitroff worked under for many years with the New England Patriots, Bill Belichick, advised against it, and now six seasons later, Belichick will have to find a way to stop Jones, a task few have managed over the years.

But in order to get Jones, Dimitroff traded his first-, second- and fourth-round picks in 2011 (Nos. 27, 59 and 124) plus his first- and fourth-round picks in 2012 to the Browns.

“This may have been a once-in-a-career type move,” Dimitroff told the Boston Globe in 2013. “We felt that we were in the right place as an organization with the amount of veteran talent we had and the amount of youthful talent we had and the quarterback we had in place. It was a time that was right for us to get ourselves a very explosive player.”

By now, you must be asking how this is relevant to the Dallas Cowboys.

Well, a few weeks ago, the Cowboys lost to the Packers in the divisional round of the playoffs as the top seed in the NFC.

Dallas' needs are obvious: defense, defense and more defense. If you want to say pass rush or cornerback or both, you wouldn’t be wrong.

So should the Cowboys consider an Atlanta-like move from No. 28 to the top of the first round to secure a pass-rusher or cornerback who will not be around later in the round?

The Browns squandered the five selections they got in the Jones trade. Phil Taylor, Greg Little, Owen Marecic and Brandon Weeden did not turn into franchise savers. The Browns traded their fourth-rounder in 2012 as part of a package in order to draft Trent Richardson with the No. 3 overall pick, but Richardson hasn't played in the NFL since the 2014 season.

The last time the Cowboys made such a bold move was in 2012, when they moved from No. 14 to No. 6 to take cornerback Morris Claiborne. To get the deal done, they gave up the 14th and 45th overall picks.

Claiborne has four career interceptions and has not played a full season because of injuries.

In 2014, the Cowboys moved up to No. 34 overall to take defensive end DeMarcus Lawrence. They gave up the 47th and 78th picks to Washington get the deal done. Lawrence has nine career sacks and recently had a second back surgery in as many offseasons.

It took the Falcons six seasons and more than just Jones to get to the Super Bowl, but they can look at that deal as a positive because of what Jones has become.

Dallas owner and GM Jerry Jones has shown a willingness to be bold, sometimes to a fault.

When the Cowboys built their Super Bowl teams of the 1990s, they did it with their sheer number of draft selections.

The Cowboys showed in 2016 that they can contend, but a team is never one piece away from a Super Bowl.
 

dallen

Senior Tech
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
8,466
I was one of the people who laughed at their stupidity for trading up to get Julio Jones. Oops
 

mcnuttz

Senior Junior Mod
Staff member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
15,761
If we pull off another trade up for a fucking CB, I will switch to hockey.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,696
Or you can look at it as the falcons set themselves back 6 years by making the trade.

So, no.

Unless the compensation is miniscule and confined to this year, I wouldn't do it. The falcons gave up way too many assets in that deal.

The falcons are in the super bowl because they finally got a pass rusher, offensive line and running game. Things they struggled to attain in part due to missing a lot of draft picks.

And they will probably lose the super bowl if ne holds them under 30, because even now they have holes on defense.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,505
If you are gonna do it, it better be for Lawrence Taylor.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,505
The Stars just stink.

The Rangers are the tease who can't get over the hump. Of course they do go deep into the playoffs unlike the Cowboys.

But one championship since 1940 and the prospect of retiring the best goalie to never win a Cup are pretty damning.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,014
The Stars just stink.

The Rangers are the tease who can't get over the hump. Of course they do go deep into the playoffs unlike the Cowboys.

But one championship since 1940 and the prospect of retiring the best goalie to never win a Cup are pretty damning.
What I mean is, on one hand he can have the team that gets expectations up every year only to crush its fanbase, or he can have the team that is just hard to watch, but shows flashes from year to year, only to suck again the next.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,612
Or you can look at it as the falcons set themselves back 6 years by making the trade.

So, no.

Unless the compensation is miniscule and confined to this year, I wouldn't do it. The falcons gave up way too many assets in that deal.

The falcons are in the super bowl because they finally got a pass rusher, offensive line and running game. Things they struggled to attain in part due to missing a lot of draft picks.

And they will probably lose the super bowl if ne holds them under 30, because even now they have holes on defense.
When I first started reading the article I thought it was going to advocate for us making a big trade up. But the second half of the article makes it pretty clear that it hasn't worked out well for other teams. The Falcons included. Even though Julio has been a big piece this year the trade up was with the thought of winning a Superbowl right away which clearly didn't happen. And it also points out the Lawrence and Claiborne moves that worked out poorly.
 

mcnuttz

Senior Junior Mod
Staff member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
15,761

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,194
If you are gonna do it, it better be for Lawrence Taylor.
Yep.

You trade two first round picks+, that player has to be a surefire All-Pro caliber stud at an impact position and/or a QB.

It's even harder to get equal value to an all-pro WR or LT from a defensive player, and you'll never equal the value of a great QB on defense.

It basically has to be JJ Watt, and there's only one of those in a generation.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Yep.

You trade two first round picks+, that player has to be a surefire All-Pro caliber stud at an impact position and/or a QB.

It's even harder to get equal value to an all-pro WR or LT from a defensive player, and you'll never equal the value of a great QB on defense.

It basically has to be JJ Watt, and there's only one of those in a generation.
Just take his brother at 28
 

Plan9Misfit

Appreciate The Hate
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
5,893
It sure as fuck better not be for a fucking CB. If we didn't learn from the last time we pissed away quality picks for a fucking DB, there's no hope for this team, and every member of the front office should be shot.
 

DLK150

DCC 4Life
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
8,789
This article smells like dead period speculation, just a filler piece because there's not much else to write about.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,465
Our front office has become a lot more conservative as far as signing expensive FA's and trading up, I can't see us giving up the assets it'd take to move up into the top 10.

Now if they'd only become more conservative as far as spending 2nd rounders on gimps.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,612
Our front office has become a lot more conservative as far as signing expensive FA's and trading up, I can't see us giving up the assets it'd take to move up into the top 10.

Now if they'd only become more conservative as far as spending 2nd rounders on gimps.
Jaylon Smith is going to pay off big... Just wait
 

shane

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
1,185
Falcons probably got lucky. We don't tend to get so lucky on these kinds of trades. It'd probably end up being Galloway or Roy Williams all over again. Pass.
 
Top Bottom