It's really sad. Especially when you see the impact of people who have money and those who don't when it comes to fighting a criminal case.
I have mixed feelings about the doc.
Yes, taken how it's presented its a very sad case. But it very well could be a complete propaganda piece like Blackfish was. My question is...
if the tampering and lack of physical evidence that points to Avery and especially the boy are so overwhelming as presented, why hasn't their cases gone all the way to the state and federal appeals levers? The state wouldn't even hear it. Getting some crooked sheriff's and a bad judge is one thing but I can't imagine it goes much higher than that.
My my guess is this is basically going to be like a Kickstarter to get funding for his federal appeal.
Maxim interviewed Katz and he is claiming the same thing. My phone is acting up and can't post the article but basically states that it's one-sided and didn't show all of the evidence. Still doesn't say it couldn't be planted but he thinks it's only purpose was to demonize the prosecutor.
Once a person is convicted those higher courts in those states are usually going to stay in line with the local jurisdictions ruling, it's very hard to get judges to go against each other.I have mixed feelings about the doc.
Yes, taken how it's presented its a very sad case. But it very well could be a complete propaganda piece like Blackfish was. My question is...
if the tampering and lack of physical evidence that points to Avery and especially the boy are so overwhelming as presented, why hasn't their cases gone all the way to the state and federal appeals levers? The state wouldn't even hear it. Getting some crooked sheriff's and a bad judge is one thing but I can't imagine it goes much higher than that.
My my guess is this is basically going to be like a Kickstarter to get funding for his federal appeal.
Maxim interviewed Katz and he is claiming the same thing. My phone is acting up and can't post the article but basically states that it's one-sided and didn't show all of the evidence. Still doesn't say it couldn't be planted but he thinks it's only purpose was to demonize the prosecutor.
Sure, in most cases. But there appeared to be some pretty significant problems in collecting evidence. I can't imagine the state would just look the other way unless it's being embellished.Once a person is convicted those higher courts in those states are usually going to stay in line with the local jurisdictions ruling, it's very hard to get judges to go against each other.
I watch a lot of the Murder Channel (Investigation Discovery) and they have these type of situations all of the time.Sure, in most cases. But there appeared to be some pretty significant problems in collecting evidence. I can't imagine the state would just look the other way unless it's being embellished.
Not sure money would have made a difference in this situation. I just got the feeling it was a case where a corrupt system was going to take care of their own regardless. This was very well done and glad I was made aware of the documentary. I won't be driving through that area in my lifetime that's for sure.
Maxim interviewed Katz and he is claiming the same thing. My phone is acting up and can't post the article but basically states that it's one-sided and didn't show all of the evidence. Still doesn't say it couldn't be planted but he thinks it's only purpose was to demonize the prosecutor.
I mean I think the documentary was definitely filmed from the side of Steven Avery.Sure, in most cases. But there appeared to be some pretty significant problems in collecting evidence. I can't imagine the state would just look the other way unless it's being embellished.
Making a Murderer
Why was Avery found guilty of owning a firearm? He wasn't a felon anymore???
For the nephew it definitely would have made a difference. His first public defender was horrific. That attorney should not only be disbarred but probably punished even beyond that. What kind of an attorney lets his client be questioned outside of his presence. It was disgusting.
I mean I think the documentary was definitely filmed from the side of Steven Avery.The sad thing is we still have no idea what happened. Even if you believe that Steven was guilty, the evidence is so messed up that it's hard to make sense of what actually happened. How did bones end up all over the place. How did his blood get in a vehicle but not his finger prints. Clearly none of the story the nephew told was really true otherwise there would have been real blood evidence in that garage or in Avery's trailer. For someone to have there entire life thrown away, we are still kind of left here wondering what in the hell actually happened to that poor girl. No way in hell Avery is intelligent enough to clean up his mess that well.
He had felony burglary charges prior to the rape one. He was convicted of burglary I think for stealing like a case of beer and a cheese sandwhich from a bar, and then like $60 in quarters or something stupid. You have to remember back to the very first few episodes when they talk about the stupid trouble he use to get into. Then there was also the charges of animal cruelty (Not sure if it was a felony) where he threw the cat screwing around with his friends and it got caught on fire. They used these things as prime example of how he always fessed up to anything he did wrong.
Not just that, but the coerced confession from his own damn attorney. That was terrible.
The blood thing is what makes me lean towards him being innocent. The story was he slit her throat laying on the bed. Then it changed to here being stabbed like 18 times. There would have been blood all over that bedroom, and not a single drop was found in the investigation. Just really hard to believe.
I remember those but couldn't remember if they were enough to be felonies.He had felony burglary charges prior to the rape one. He was convicted of burglary I think for stealing like a case of beer and a cheese sandwhich from a bar, and then like $60 in quarters or something stupid. You have to remember back to the very first few episodes when they talk about the stupid trouble he use to get into. Then there was also the charges of animal cruelty (Not sure if it was a felony) where he threw the cat screwing around with his friends and it got caught on fire. They used these things as prime example of how he always fessed up to anything he did wrong.