How fast the game can change.O State is being ambushed.
Arkansas is not a bottom dweller like Kansas, Texas, Iowa State and compounding that it's a down year fo Kansas State.LSU to Arkansas?
I think the argument is that the system he's in isn't a fit. And he did look much better when O'Brien was HC. He's got the measureables.Hackenburg sucks ass. How anyone thinks he has franchise traits is beyond me. Can't feel the rush, looks like a complete idiot out there.
When they went to the 4 team playoff they put a provision in place that prevents them from expanding beyond 4 teams for at least 10 years, I think.Most of the debate over who deserves a shot at the championship would be solved by expanding to 8.
I agree with those saying that the eye test is bullshit. I feel like it was the same problem with the BCS system and with the ranking system before that.
I prefer teams earn it on the field.
My only thought for expansion is that you could make it so every major conference is likely represented in the playoff system. I hesitate to make every conference champ an automatic bid into the playoffs only because there is some potential for a really average team to bad team to win a conference championship game and then make it. Not sure I want a 3 or 4 loss team in the college football playoffs.When they went to the 4 team playoff they put a provision in place that prevents them from expanding beyond 4 teams for at least 10 years, I think.
I'm actually happy with 4 teams. If we go to 8 teams you're going to have the same problem with biases playing a role and debates about 6 teams vying for the 7th and 8th seed.
We are middle of the pack, Buster!LSU to Arkansas?
There's always going to be debate over the last team or teams getting in. But it's much harder to make a legit case for having a realistic shot with the 9th team than it is with the 5th team.
And they used the same excuses about how compelling the debates are in defense of the BCS and the ranking system before that. It's nonsense and it's always been nonsense.