No. He doesn't have the presence. Plus why would he work with a bunch of people who did nothing but blame him for Dallas' failure? Can you imagine him and Marshall Faulk on the same set?Romo will do what most do. Go into broadcasting.
Why? For money. Presence is subjective I suppose and the Media folks will ultimately decide that.No. He doesn't have the presence. Plus why would he work with a bunch of people who did nothing but blame him for Dallas' failure? Can you imagine him and Marshall Faulk on the same set?
What?No. He doesn't have the presence. Plus why would he work with a bunch of people who did nothing but blame him for Dallas' failure? Can you imagine him and Marshall Faulk on the same set?
He doesn't have to look like Zack Efron to talk about football.Romo does pretty well when he heads into Jimmy Kimmel or whatever, he's definitely more charismatic than a lot of broadcasters.
He will not age well though, once his boyish looks go, his soft features are going to make him look androgynous. Like Paul McCartny.
Yeah, Chris Collinsworth has been at the top of the mountain for a long time, and he looks like a scarecrow covered in turkey skin.He doesn't have to look like Zack Efron to talk about football.
Yeah, Chris Collinsworth has been at the top of the mountain for a long time, and he looks like a scarecrow covered in turkey skin.
watRomo does pretty well when he heads into Jimmy Kimmel or whatever, he's definitely more charismatic than a lot of broadcasters.
He will not age well though, once his boyish looks go, his soft features are going to make him look androgynous. Like Paul McCartny.
I would have guessed you'd go with a Gary Cooper reference here.He doesn't have to look like Zack Efron to talk about football.
I can do that also. Been watching the oldies huh?I would have guessed you'd go with a Gary Cooper reference here.