- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 52,811
To clarify...the "Not elusive either" post from above is sarcastic.
More sarcasm.http://www.dallascowboys.com/video/2014/11/09/joseph-randle-breaks-through-jags-defense-40-yard-td
Totally can't break any tackles.
Yeah I'm sure I said this. If you think the surface doesn't make a difference at all, you're wrong.I love it, Randle can only run on grass fields.
Not as a starter and maybe not even as a #2 if he can't block.Randle has value as a RB on anyone's team.
There are two distinct circumstances here. Randle as a personal character risk and Randle as an athletic performer. He clearly is morally dficient and as such a bad risk as an employee. As a physical performer he is capable of fulfilling a back up RB role. From a decision standpoint since you cannot separate an individual then he becomes a bad risk as an employee and should have no place on the team.
Love the Randle crap in this thread.
Part of the problem, you have a serious issue understanding what performance is.There are two distinct circumstances here. Randle as a personal character risk and Randle as an athletic performer. He clearly is morally dficient and as such a bad risk as an employee. As a physical performer he is capable of fulfilling a back up RB role. From a decision standpoint since you cannot separate an individual then he becomes a bad risk as an employee and should have no place on the team.
Apparently I am not alone. You seem to be the lone voice of disent.Part of the problem, you have a serious issue understanding what performance is.
That's fine. A bunch of people defended Quincy Carter for years. One no talent retard for another.Apparently I am not alone. You seem to be the lone voice of disent.
That logic is flak. Carter has nothing to do with Randle.That's fine. A bunch of people defended Quincy Carter for years. One no talent retard for another.
They were both big time retards that had clear and distinct examples of ignorance, yet fans were still defending them even when the writing was clearly on the wall.That logic is flak. Carter has nothing to do with Randle.
When his biggest promoters are saying his upside is 1200-1300 yards behind arguably the leagues best oline that in itself tells he isn't worth the trouble, he's as prime an asthma field candidate as there ever was.Apparently I am not alone. You seem to be the lone voice of disent.
I have already taken that position myself. I was pointing out that his failing is with his character not necessarily with his athletic ability.When his biggest promoters are saying his upside is 1200-1300 yards behind arguably the leagues best oline that in itself tells he isn't worth the trouble, he's as prime an asthma field candidate as there ever was.
In addition I am only viewinghim as a back up role.When his biggest promoters are saying his upside is 1200-1300 yards behind arguably the leagues best oline that in itself tells he isn't worth the trouble, he's as prime an asthma field candidate as there ever was.