- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 120,030
Fuck you. That draft sucked and no amount of justifying it will make it any better.
Fuck you. That draft sucked and no amount of justifying it will make it any better.
People say you should come out of the draft with two starters. I think we've done that. Possibly three, which would make it a pretty good draft. I wouldn't classify that as a draft sucking. Especially if we whiffed on a 5th and some 7ths.That draft sucked and no amount of justifying it will make it any better.
Fuck you. That draft sucked and no amount of justifying it will make it any better.
Don't think Beasley can fill the Gunner role or returns for a sustained period.I suspect that Cole Beasley is the plan for Harris's replacement.
Don't think Beasley can fill the Gunner role or returns for a sustained period.
I suspect that Cole Beasley is the plan for Harris's replacement.
I think they mean Randle.Yep.
Randle returning punts? I don't see it.I think they mean Randle.
And I bet a veteran is brought in.
He can't do it.Randle returning punts? I don't see it.
Just that easy, huh?I think they mean Randle.
And I bet a veteran is brought in.
I meant Dunbar.Randle returning punts? I don't see it.
He sucks at it.I meant Dunbar.
I have been the guy saying all along losing Harris will be a big loss, so I don't know why you think I think it will be easy.Just that easy, huh?
Look above..He sucks at it.
I was referring to the bring in a veteran part. Teams don't usually let quality returners go unless they are extremely one dimensional.I have been the guy saying all along losing Harris will be a big loss, so I don't know why you think I think it will be easy.
I don't think a good returner is currently on the roster.
It didn't suck.People say you should come out of the draft with two starters. I think we've done that. Possibly three, which would make it a pretty good draft. I wouldn't classify that as a draft sucking. Especially if we whiffed on a 5th and some 7ths.