Cowlishaw: Jason Garrett lacked common sense late in Cowboys game against Jaguars

p1_

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
26,581
Cowlishaw: Jason Garrett lacked common sense late in Cowboys game against Jaguars

The next time you see Jerry Jones on the Cowboys’ sideline during a game, don’t scream at your TV set. Don’t even complain about it. He may just be down there dispensing common sense.

There wasn’t much of that to be found in head coach Jason Garrett’s handling of a 31-17 win over the hapless Jacksonville Jaguars in London on Sunday. The game itself was filled with Cowboys highlights, offering assurances that this team is very much back in the thick of things in the NFC playoff chase following a two-game losing skid.

But as a 31-7 third-quarter lead became a 31-7 fourth-quarter lead, Cowboys fans across the pond here were all shouting the same question:

Why is Romo still playing?

I don’t need to recite all the details of the fractures in his back. You’ve heard about that for two weeks. And you saw how this offense failed to function without him in a 28-17 loss to the Arizona Cardinals, so you know what he means to this team’s future.

But there he was, third-and-10, less than nine minutes to play, Cowboys holding a 31-7 lead. And there he went, sacked to the turf, very deliberate in getting to his feet after a 6-yard loss. With 8:07 to play, the Cowboys punted and when they got the ball back, Brandon Weeden finally entered the game.

That was almost a quarter too late.

Once the game got to 31-7 in the third quarter, there was no sense in sending Romo back into harm’s way. The Jaguars’ defense was still capable of the occasional sack, but the Jacksonville offense wasn’t mounting a comeback.

I know how quickly things can unravel in an NFL game, but this is a Jaguars team that starts a rookie quarterback, two rookie wide receivers and first- and second-year men all over the offensive line.

This is a Jacksonville team whose drives from first to fourth quarter Sunday went: Touchdown. Punt. Punt. Fumble. Punt. Punt. Downs. Punt. Downs.

Garrett seemed baffled afterward that questions would be raised as to how he handled Romo in his current delicate state. And that’s always been part of the problem with Garrett as head coach.

A Princeton graduate, he fears coming across as a pointy-headed intellectual at all costs. He wraps himself in the history of the game, spinning Pudge Heffelfinger stories and talking toughness.

At some point a little cold-blooded logic is in order. Just because Romo didn’t suffer debilitating injuries on the fourth-quarter hits he absorbed doesn’t make it OK.

We have seen it for years, and every coach in football is reluctant to pull his starting quarterback, but look how two teams with Super Bowl aspirations handled their blowout situations Sunday.

Denver’s Peyton Manning did not set foot on the field in Oakland in the fourth quarter. Green Bay’s Aaron Rodgers turned the reins over to Matt Flynn against Chicago with seven minutes left in the third quarter.

Scores and opponents make for different situations, but neither Manning nor Rodgers were nursing damaged backs in the wake of off-season surgery.

On Saturday night at Amon Carter Stadium, I wondered — if only briefly — why TCU head coach Gary Patterson still had his electrifying quarterback, Trevone Boykin, on the field in the fourth quarter after he had landed awkwardly out of bounds in the third and appeared to injure his left wrist.

TCU held a 41-14 lead at the time, and Kansas State wasn’t rallying from that. But Patterson knows what happened to a 21-point lead with eight minutes to go in Waco last month. In addition — right or wrong — seemingly every passing and rushing yard counts when a player is in the middle of a Heisman Trophy chase. Boykin has injected himself into that conversation.

With six minutes to play, Boykin finally retired to the bench. He can continue his Heisman pursuit Saturday in Lawrence, Kan.

Romo gets a much needed week of rest. No harm was done when Garrett allowed him to overstay his return from last week’s inactive list. That doesn’t make it right. Poor decisions that somehow avoid costly results should not be applauded.

And the next time the Cowboys find themselves having put away an opponent long before the final gun sounds, I’m all for the general manager transporting himself to the sideline and telling the head coach to do the right thing.
 

kidd

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 28, 2013
Messages
2,377
I didn't want him playing at all.

So I was really ticked to see him still playing after getting a 31-7 lead.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
It was ridiculous to force Romo to stay in AND keep passing, leading to Romo taking two sacks, up 31-7. But, we all know about JG's in-game decision making. Big Ben, parliament.
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,475
I thought it was dumb to have Murray in there as well.

You talk about wanting to conserve him but then put him out there to handle meaningless carries.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,744
It was ridiculous to force Romo to stay in AND keep passing, leading to Romo taking two sacks, up 31-7. But, we all know about JG's in-game decision making. Big Ben, parliament.
The Jags only had one sack all game...
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,142
I thought it was dumb to have Murray in there as well.

You talk about wanting to conserve him but then put him out there to handle meaningless carries.
They were trying to get him to 100.
 

Newt

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
1,148
They were trying to get him to 100.
I know that's what they were trying to do, but after breaking the streak of 100 yard games the week before, I didn't think it was important to leave him out there just to get 2 more yards. I think it took another 4 carries to get from 98 yards to 100, Jacksonville stacked the box late and they were tough yards to get. If he had gotten to 100 against Arizona I would have been all for it, maybe even a little more for good measure, but I don't think there was any reason to put him in in the 4th quarter against Jacksonville.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,744
I know that's what they were trying to do, but after breaking the streak of 100 yard games the week before, I didn't think it was important to leave him out there just to get 2 more yards. I think it took another 4 carries to get from 98 yards to 100, Jacksonville stacked the box late and they were tough yards to get. If he had gotten to 100 against Arizona I would have been all for it, maybe even a little more for good measure, but I don't think there was any reason to put him in in the 4th quarter against Jacksonville.
This was my thought as well. Having 100 yards rushing for Murray in that game was a meaningless stat. If anything I may want to hold back on the stat padding because Murray will have a contract due at the end of this year.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,806
It was dumb to leave Romo, Bryant and Murray in. Really, really dumb.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
The Jags only had one sack all game...
The sack happened about the time my stream crashed, I must have seen the reaction to the sack on here and thought they had sacked him again. Still, the sack and several hits did come after we were up 31-7.
 

p1_

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
26,581
Yeah, there were several hits after the game was well in hand. Dumb as hell to leave broke back in the game.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,214
Everyone agrees it was stupid.

I think somewhere deep inside Garrett wants to be perceived as a genius whose offense utterly destroys the other team, resulting in the 45-__ blowouts we see from today's WCO and other pass-happy offenses.

It's like he doesn't understand the product he's put on the field and how carefully balanced it is. The great 1990's teams that destroyed the NFL worked off the same principals as today's team: crush the defense's will with a balanced attack and reap the benefits with your own defense.

Instead, I think Garrett wanted to run up the score and "show" the rest of the NFL how much his offense still means business.

Instead he proved once again how smart people can be really dumb sometimes.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,140
I thought it was dumb to have Murray in there as well.

You talk about wanting to conserve him but then put him out there to handle meaningless carries.
For real. If you can't rest him up big against a wretched Jax team that can barely move the ball, when can you?

And the games are only going to get tougher going against NY on the road, Philly twice, and Indy. Odds are you're going to need him all four quarters in those games.

Sorry, Murray, you're getting used up and that's all there is to it.

And that's not even talking about an injured Romo. It was complete lunacy to leave him in that long.
 
Top Bottom