junk
Not So New Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 580
There's a significant difference. But hey, don't let technology get in the way. And considering no animal uses any weapons when it hunts other than its own physical ability, why shift the degree of advantage? That's all I'm asking. Regardless of the excuses that hunters use to justify the use of guns in a hunt, there aren't any. Use a bow and arrow.
That's the problem with hunters. They've convinced themselves that anything they do is in the right and have no solution for anyone who challenges them. I never said that hunting should be banned. I said that it's a necessary evil, but hunters should be relegated to less advantageous means of hunting. This way, if they miss, the animal has a reasonable opportunity to either escape or defend itself. In my opinion, if we have the right to hunt and kill the animal, then it's equally acceptable for the animal to hunt and kill the person.
These types of comments always make me laugh. Obviously made by someone who has never hunted or been around hunting in their entire life.
WTF does that even mean? Do you realize that animals do hunt and kill people if you wander into their territory? Bears, mountain lions, etc. could/would do that.Plan9Misfit said:"In my opinion, if we have the right to hunt and kill the animal, then it's equally acceptable for the animal to hunt and kill the person"
One of the last things I'd want to run into in the wild is a moose. Even a deer can do some damage if they wanted to.