Search results

Several things: 1) It was a great play 2) perhaps I don’t like the NFL rule 3) I had no knowledge of the leading foot requirement (first foot to land I now understand) in NCAA rules.

This is what I didn’t know. The “leading toe” as it were.

I wasn’t suggesting discarding rules situationally.

What did I miss?

How so?

Do you hate the college rule?

Agreed. Just like last nights play . One foot in. One foot out. ….and wait for it….. TD. Game on.

I’m referring to NCAA rule. Comparing the two differing treatments for the same play.

As was said last night, AFC home field advantage may come down to that toe.

One foot or toe over does not invalidate a reception.

I’m just pointing out that there is support for a reception where the receiver’s foot crosses a boundary. Just because it’s NCAA doesn’t mean it’s bad or invalid.

So what do you say about this rule: In college football, a player only needs to get one foot down in bounds to make a catch along the sideline, in the corner, or in the back of the end zone? Wait, I know, it’s “retarded”. :disgusted

as I said, rules are rules. However, as a fan, I’m still allowed to question the rule.

I agree Jackson the MVP missed badly on those plays. I even remarked that it reminded me of Dak. He redeemed himself on the final play. It was a great play in a great ending, only to be denied. The drama the league and networks love. I just struggle with 'breaking the plane" by a toe (or a...

Dez is right .

:lol

thats a shitty way to lose, by a fucking toe.

Dak-esque.