Search results

Great. A washed up RB who can’t get more than 2.5ypc to complement a guy coming off of a major knee injury. Recipe for success, right there.

That's really what irritates me the most. They're painting the picture of a total rebuild for next year (new HC, and new QB) but aren't doing anything to position themselves to hit the ground running. If they had any strategic vision (which they don't), then they'd focus on trading Dak to...

Yes, yes he does.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/reggie-reggie-bush-to-get-2005-heisman-trophy-back-as-former-usc-trojans-star-wins-long-battle-per-report/amp/ It’s about fucking time.

And that’s why Jerry doesn’t care. He knows that people will still go to games, still buy merchandise, still watch them on TV, and that advertisers and sponsors will still line up no matter what happens.

Like I said, clueless. No GM of a team - in any fucking sport - will ever be in a position where he doesn’t know the team’s cap situation. Because stuff like that gets you fired. Except when you’re Jerry Jones, the “GM”.

If it helps accelerate Jerry’s final entrance into the dirt, then I’m all for it.

Listening to that imbecile’s verbal vomit rambling about being an “Option QB” is as insulting to fans as anything he’s said in recent memory. It really demonstrates how clueless, disconnected, and indifferent he really is.

The more they speak, the more I hate them.

Lest you conveniently forget him throwing 2 awful INTs; one of which was a TAINT, and the other out the defense on a short field and gave up the TD. Shouldn’t Dak be held accountable for gift wrapping 14 points to Green Bay, or was that “most embarrassing loss EVER!!1!!!1!!one!!!!!” solely on...

Exactly. Playing like shit for the first 1-3 quarters of a game and then putting up garbage time stats when the defenses get soft because they know there aren't enough possessions available for us to come back doesn't mean a fucking thing.

It's not just lazy. It's destructive to the team, as you deplete the team of talent and resources to overpay a player who can't perform up to the standard expected based on the value of the contract.

I was just about to say the same thing. Injuries have held him back more than any potentially poor play.

He's played in a total of 4 games. So, if he's the "worst QB you've EVER!!!1!!! seen" then you haven't watched a lot of football. His sample size is way too small to make any true assessment. Now, I'm not suggesting that he's some superstar. He isn't. But I'm also not willing to say that he's...

That’s why the big picture screams either full overhaul and rebuild or trading Dak.

Because having a down year massively depreciates his value. Waiving the clause would allow him to get a massive extension in that $60M a year range that he wants, where if he struggles this year, he gives the Clampett’s a lot of leverage back because they can then justify refusing to pay him.

Nope

This is why you try to work out a trade this week and see if Dak will waive the no-trade clause. You roll with Lance and see what he has. If the talent is there, you keep him. If it isn’t, then you draft a QB next year.

I disagree. Having our asses handed to us by teams with above .500 records proves that out. He plays like dog shit against teams with winning records, with stats eerily similar to those of playoff teams.

Exactly. If someone (as an unlikely example) like Brock Bowers falls, you take him, because no other player surpasses his talent and value at that spot. But a 2nd round LB? Hell no. Hair-brained decisions like that are what cause GMs of legitimate teams to be fired.