MacMahon: Jerry - QB coach in press box a key change

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,378
Jerry: QB coach in press box a key change

November, 27, 2013

By Tim MacMahon | ESPNDallas.com


IRVING, Texas -- Head coach Jason Garrett's role in the Dallas Cowboys' revamped offensive play-calling process got most of the attention.

Owner/general manager Jerry Jones, however, thinks people have overlooked the most important change. He cited quarterbacks coach Wade Wilson moving from the sideline to the press box as the most significant adjustment to the play-calling process.

Offensive coordinator Bill Callahan had been relaying play calls through Wilson on the sideline all season until Sunday, when Garrett replaced Wilson as the middleman between Callahan and quarterback Tony Romo, with Wilson joining the offensive coordinator in the press box.

“The key there is Wade Wilson,” Jones said Wednesday morning on the NFL Network. “Wade Wilson is a seasoned veteran, not only an outstanding NFL player, but he’s been an outstanding coach. We always wanted to figure out somehow how to get his vision, his skill up in that box.

“When you watch the game the way you and I watch it, it’s a different game than right there on the sideline or behind the center as the quarterback. So we had the advantage of having Wade Wilson upstairs looking down on the game, and then he’d relay that in.

“Of course, Tony makes the decisions out there and has the ability. That was a big part of why that worked so much. He has the ability to call it a run, call it a pass or go to play-action, all of those things. I think we’ve got a great combination. The key ingredient is Wade Wilson upstairs looking at the game.”

It’s not as if the Cowboys morphed into an offensive juggernaut with the changes, although it worked well enough for Dallas to pull out a critical 24-21 win against the New York Giants. The Cowboys scored two offensive touchdowns and accounted for 327 total yards in the win, putting together a 15-play, 64-yard drive to set up the game-winning field goal in the final seconds.

Garrett has downplayed what has been perceived as his increased role in the play-calling process. Jones gives most of the play-calling credit to Romo, not the coaching staff.

“He’s a natural play-caller,” Jones said. “He really is imaginative. When he’s out there running the team, we get to use all that. That was a part of our offseason work, to give him more say-so about how we’re going down the field than he has had in the past. Now, to do that, you’ve got to be in there on Monday and Tuesday with the coaches, not necessarily on the off day with the players. He’s done that, done it religiously, and it’s paying off for us.”
 

mcnuttz

Senior Junior Mod
Staff member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
15,867
Wade Wilson's job is about as cushy as the Cowboys GM post.

I don't think he'll ever get fired.
 

mcnuttz

Senior Junior Mod
Staff member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
15,867
Continuity
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
I know Jones likes to embellish but Wilson did have a long career in the NFL and he did accumulate a lot of experience. That is better IMO than having an OC like the Shanahan kid who rode his dad's coat tails to his job.
 

junk

Not So New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
580
Why are people acting like this "change" was a huge success? They scored 17 fucking points and needed a defensive touchdown to win!
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
Why are people acting like this "change" was a huge success? They scored 17 fucking points and needed a defensive touchdown to win!
You have to admit something lifted the offense out of their funk and helped them to pull off a good win.
 

junk

Not So New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
580
You have to admit something lifted the offense out of their funk and helped them to pull off a good win.
The offense was lifted out of their funk? Really?

They scored the exact same number of points as they did the week before in New Orleans. The same as they did in Philly. I think the only game they scored less was the KC game.

Total Net Yards against NY: 327
Total Net Yards against KC: 318

I'll say it again. The continued offensive inefficiencies were disguised by a win. People talked about the play calling change, Dallas added a few offensive wrinkles and the team won, so people assumed it was effective.

I'm just saying, the results don't really bear that out.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,018
The offense was lifted out of their funk? Really?

They scored the exact same number of points as they did the week before in New Orleans. The same as they did in Philly. I think the only game they scored less was the KC game.

Total Net Yards against NY: 327
Total Net Yards against KC: 318

I'll say it again. The continued offensive inefficiencies were disguised by a win. People talked about the play calling change, Dallas added a few offensive wrinkles and the team won, so people assumed it was effective.

I'm just saying, the results don't really bear that out.

Correct. And this was against a mediocre as hell Giants defense.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
The offense was lifted out of their funk? Really?

They scored the exact same number of points as they did the week before in New Orleans. The same as they did in Philly. I think the only game they scored less was the KC game.

Total Net Yards against NY: 327
Total Net Yards against KC: 318

I'll say it again. The continued offensive inefficiencies were disguised by a win. People talked about the play calling change, Dallas added a few offensive wrinkles and the team won, so people assumed it was effective.

I'm just saying, the results don't really bear that out.
I guess I must be naive. I thought the game was about winning not style points.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,018
I guess I must be naive. I thought the game was about winning not style points.
Problem is, do you want to win this one, isolated game, or do you want to win multiple games?

Yes, the combination of everything they did in that game was enough to win that game.

But getting 17 offensive points is not enough to win on a consistent basis, because you can't always count on getting a defensive touchdown. Without the score on defense against the Giants we didn't produce enough points on offense to win.

This is not isolated. The offense has been inadequate for a significant portion of our games. It's a problem. Maybe you can get by against the Giants. But we will likely have to do better in the future to win this division, and their track record is not encouraging.

This is why people were hoping that this change in offensive structure might have helped. The question presented was whether the change translated to better production. So far, the facts say no. And from a macroscopic view, that's a problem.
 

VA Cowboy

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
4,710
I guess I must be naive. I thought the game was about winning not style points.
It is about winning but this discussion was about the offense being lifted out of it's funk. Like Junk pointed out, we only scored 17 offensive points.
 

jester

Brand New Member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
231
This team really has only one template to win games- Tony Romo. Ideally you want a true team effort defense and special teams. But because of injury, this team is one dimenttional and on Sunday vs the Giants Romo was hindered by the wind. Each game has its own challenges and the team that overcomes those usually prevails... I'd take a team that scratches and claws to wins anyday of the week and won't think less of them for it.
 

junk

Not So New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
580
I guess I must be naive. I thought the game was about winning not style points.
It is about points, period. Dallas isn't scoring enough of them and hasn't in Garrett's entire tenure here.

Beating a bad Giants team, with the aid of a defensive touchdown, doesn't really lend itself to the offense breaking out of it's slump.
 

jester

Brand New Member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
231
It is about points, period. Dallas isn't scoring enough of them and hasn't in Garrett's entire tenure here.

Beating a bad Giants team, with the aid of a defensive touchdown, doesn't really lend itself to the offense breaking out of it's slump.
We all had and still has high hopes for Dez to rake in the TD's. In the plus category the Red Zone % has shown marked improvement, we just gotta get there more often. That said, not scoring enough points was the argument for bringing 72 year old coordinator. Preventing defenses from scoring makes the job of the offense to score points less burdensome.
 
Top Bottom