Undercover Cop Participates in the Beating of an Innocent Family

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
An off-duty undercover NYPD cop who denied any involvement as his fellow bikers ripped a father from his SUV and beat him has been seen on video smashing the rear window, it emerged today.
The footage apparently shows the unnamed officer, who is a veteran of seven years, banging on the window and shattering it before the driver was pulled from the vehicle.
The cop then rides away from the scene, sources told NBC. The video, which is being reviewed, is not the same as that which has been widely circulated following the September 29 attack.
Sources added to the New York Post that the cop initially told investigators he did not intervene because he arrived too late to stop the vicious beating.
The officer is assigned to the NYPD Intelligence Division, but sources did not reveal whether he was on assignment or whether his actions were a ploy to protect his cover.
Michael Palladino, president of the NYPD detectives' union, said the undercover officer was forced to make a difficult decision.
'Compromising his identity could compromise all the work he's doing and his safety as well,' Palladino told NBC. 'It's very difficult to lead a double life.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449381/New-York-SUV-attack-Undercover-NYPD-cop-DID-part.html

This isn't one of those "blame just that one cop" things because there is a cover up (NYPD lying to the NY Post) and the identity of the officer is protected. I guess NYPD sucks so bad they've decided to take an "if you can't beat them, join them" attitude towards gangs.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
I'm starting to wonder if the good cops like Forts are all as old as Forts and getting ready to retire. The new generation seems to be opening up an era of police brutality that harkens back to the pre-civil-rights movement days.
 

jeebs

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
670
If the guy wasnt undercover he wouldnt have been there to be able to intervene, if the guy intervenes he would not be there next time.

The cops a few cities down from me had a "taser mistake" and shot a handcuffed man in the chest with a .45, and the papers all refer to it as a taser mistake, not a shooting someone at pointblank range mistake. The fact they are still employed pisses me off more than this.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
If the guy wasnt undercover he wouldnt have been there to be able to intervene, if the guy intervenes he would not be there next time.
He personally wouldn't have been there next time. Someone could easily be. When you don't rise to that occasion, it's not for the greater good, it's because you had a complete balls failure or else went native.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,046
If the guy wasnt undercover he wouldnt have been there to be able to intervene, if the guy intervenes he would not be there next time.
The officer wasn't undercover at the time... That's why the article mentions him being an off duty officer.
 

jeebs

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
670
He personally wouldn't have been there next time. Someone could easily be. When you don't rise to that occasion, it's not for the greater good, it's because you had a complete balls failure or else went native.
I would think twice, and i have enough confidence in my balls to know that it wasn't fear that gave me pause.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
The officer wasn't undercover at the time... That's why the article mentions him being an off duty officer.
I think that's not the case, not sure why they called him off-duty, but it was clear he had a cover identity as a biker

I would think twice, and i have enough confidence in my balls to know that it wasn't fear that gave me pause.
That's because you'd probably get your rocks off to it. The other bikers would have to stop you from using your homemade flamethrower.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,046
I think that's not the case, not sure why they called him off-duty, but it was clear he had a cover identity as a biker
No he was off duty. This wasn't the only spot I saw that. There was a news report about it that I saw also that made it very clear he wasn't actually undercover at the time of the incident. My first inclination when I heard the story was that he was undercover with a biker gang but that wasn't actually the case. This was an off duty officer basically doing this on his own free time.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
How the hell are you off duty undercover? It's not like he's pretending to be a hooker, if he's in with some kind of gang, odds are he isn't gonna show up to the department Christmas party.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,046
The cowardly cop is one of three NYPD officers to participate in the ride that led to the attack. The News was first to report off-duty Detective Samir Gonsalves, 34, took part in the rogue ride, but not the beatdown. Sources said a cop who works in the Internal Affairs Bureau also took part in the ride. The 28-year-old officer, with five years on the force, told his supervisors he was there and will likely be disciplined, sources said.


Pulled from another article. I wasn't aware there were multiple officers int he group.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,046
How the hell are you off duty undercover? It's not like he's pretending to be a hooker, if he's in with some kind of gang, odds are he isn't gonna show up to the department Christmas party.
Do you think undercover officers never have times when they aren't undercover?
 
Top Bottom