Deciphering The Decision: Tony Romo's Interception

lostxn

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
7,876
Deciphering The Decision: Tony Romo's Interception
By Joey Ickes on Oct 7 2013, 7:54a 684

Fans and media alike will have a lot to talk about this week, most of it centered on the Tony Romo interception. Let's look at that play to really understand what happened.

183457278.0_standard_709.0.jpg

The interception was crushing, no doubt about it. It was deflating, demoralizing, and devastating all at the same time, and didn't take long before NBC's "Football Night in America" crew of Rodney Harrison and Tony Dungy picked up the film and talked about how it was a very Romo-like play, and how he made a horrible decision. But like all decisions, it can only truly be judged by evaluating the information available at the time of the decision and determining if it was a mistake based on those conditions and conclusions that could be drawn about possible outcomes.


Frame of Reference
It's important to note, QB's are taught to read progressions in order, every snap, jumping from their first to second to third read, looking for the open area to throw to. Keep in mind that many times they aren't looking at the actual receivers but instead they are reading the area where the receivers route will end up. They are taught to throw to the first open man they find. It's also important to remember that running backs are often the last read in the progression, unless they are the designated "hot route" if the defense brings pressure.

Now, based on those constraints and with the mind of a QB, let's look at what Romo was seeing at the point he made the decision he did and let that information drive our evaluation of the play.

Romo_Pick_medium.jpg

If we keep our focus down the field (as Romo would have done) we can see three Cowboys receivers. DeMarco Murray, (short-middle between the hashes), Jason Witten (running upfield on the #'s about 10 yards down field), and Gavin Escobar (running across the field about 10 yards down field between the hashes behind Murray).

Based on the broadcast footage of the play that is available, you can see Romo's first read is either Dez Bryant or Terrance Williams who were in a trips alignment with Escobar to the left side. Then you see Romo's head pop back to the middle of the field, moving to Escobar's route, which is likely either his 2nd or 3rd read on the play.

When his head pops around he sees the shot above, (actually about 1/4 of a second has passed between his head turning and this point, but the idea is the same). Escobar has leverage on the LB who is covering him and the nearest defender in the direction he is headed is outside of Witten on top of the numbers. The distance from the outside hashmark to the top of the numbers is 10 yards and there is just over 6 yards between the left hash and the right hash. That puts about 15 yards between Escobar and the most threatening defender in the direction he's running. The second most dangerous defender is about 8 yards down field and 8 yards to Romo's right of Escobar meaning he's just over 11 yards from Escobar and would have to come through #89's body to make a play on the ball.

By NFL standards, Escobar is WIDE open based on his route, leverage, and spacing!

This makes the throw to Escobar a no-brainer decision for Romo here. Remember he's looking for grass to throw to and there's 15 yards of grass which Escobar is running to for Romo to put the ball.

This should be an easy completion and should give the Cowboys a very manageable 3rd and 4-6 to convert and continue to march down the field to win this shootout.

But tragedy strikes...

Look at the yellow circle on the screen shot above. Or look at the blown up version below...

Romo_Foot_medium.jpg

As Romo steps to deliver the ball to his wide open man, Tyron Smith's foot steps directly in his line, and as Romo's motion continues, his lower body (where power is generated) is eliminated from the throw - it becomes all arm. The difference in velocity between this ball and every other ball that Romo had thrown in the middle part of the field was noticeable to the naked eye, and even more noticeable watching it back 2 or 3 more times.

Because of the lack of velocity, Broncos LB Danny Travathon was able to make a big time play and dive in front of Escobar, and make the interception.

We all know what happened after this play but I think we at BTB are all smart enough fans to apply the proper constraints to the situation and agree, Romo did not make a bad decision on the play.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,905
It should be obvious and shouldn't take this level of analysis to understand this but this is exactly right. People are too blinded by the Romo narrative. It has nothing to do with this specific play.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,063
It should be obvious and shouldn't take this level of analysis to understand this but this is exactly right. People are too blinded by the Romo narrative. It has nothing to do with this specific play.
Funny how Garrett's own description of the play and Romo's decision differs from this internet fanboy perspective.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Well, he's a still a choker and the unluckiest guy to put up pretty numbers that has ever played.
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,265
Funny how Garrett's own description of the play and Romo's decision differs from this internet fanboy perspective.
It's also funny how you are taking Garrett at his word on this, using it to support your position, but every other time you blow him off.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,561
I don't agree with this interpretation at all. Escobar was not "wide" open, he may have been barely open, there was still a trailing defender that was obviously in position to make a play on anything but a ball that was well out in front on Escobar, and there was also a top-side help defender camped out on the route.

And if the ball was led to far, the offensive play design had another receiver in the area, meaning another defender was there and able to come off the other receiver to make a play on the ball as well.

Given the play design and the zone defense, I don't consider him particularly open, especially given that no one was on Murray. I also don't buy that the trip took THAT much velocity off the ball.

Sad thing is, if he had another half second of pocket time, Escobar would have ran his defender even farther from Murray and Murray could have picked up a good chunk of yards.
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,480
It's also funny how you are taking Garrett at his word on this, using it to support your position, but every other time you blow him off.
I personally don't care who said it because it doesn't take a genius to watch that play and see that Romo losing his balance didn't matter much in the grand scheme of things.

Escobar had almost no separation and had 3 defenders convering on him.

It was a bad decision and anyone who argues otherwise is either stupid or just can't blame Romo for any of his mistakes.
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,480
I don't agree with this interpretation at all. Escobar was not "wide" open, he may have been barely open, there was still a trailing defender that was obviously in position to make a play on anything but a ball that was well out in front on Escobar, and there was also a top-side help defender camped out on the route.
Exactly, but don't let the replays actually dictate facts. :dunce

If he leads it too far, the other defender probably makes the pick too. That throw needed to be absolutely perfect just to have a chance to hit Escobar's hands, and even if it did, it would've been a bang-bang play because of how close the defenders were on either side of him.

Again, it was a poor decision on a play that had very little chance for success. But we can blame it on being stepped on....and stuff.
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
50,467
Looking at the replay, I thought the ball was kinda slick.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,905
Funny how Garrett's own description of the play and Romo's decision differs from this internet fanboy perspective.
Not only do I disagree with Garrett, I think it was wrong for him to say it. He completely threw his QB under the bus.
 
Last edited:

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,480
Not only do I disagree with Garrett, I think it was wrong for him today it. He completely threw his QB under the bus.
Romo is still trying to justify it as being bad luck, essentially.

He always tries to explain why he F'd up. So since he's not going to be accountable, as Peyton Manning was for his pick, I'm glad Garrett called him out.

It's about time this dumbass stops trying to explain why he thought it would work and acknowledge that he needs to stop making these types of boneheaded throws in such critical parts of a game.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,905
Well, he's a still a choker and the unluckiest guy to put up pretty numbers that has ever played.
Romo has the most 4th quarter comeback wins in the Nfl since 2011 (9). In case you are bad at math the team has 18 total wins since 2011.

But he's a choker. Got it.

Maybe the team just puts him in a position to have to win games at the end way too often.

Here's where someone comes back with, but it's not overall comebacks, but he chokes in the big spots or key spots or important games or whatever. Like that key huge important early October game against non-conference Denver in which the loss had the huge implication of keeping them in first place and not affecting tie breakers. Right.

I am way more upset over how Romo played against KC and SD than Denver. I'll take Romo's performance in the Denver game every time and we'd win way more often than we'd lose.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,905
Romo is still trying to justify it as being bad luck, essentially.

He always tries to explain why he F'd up. So since he's not going to be accountable, as Peyton Manning was for his pick, I'm glad Garrett called him out.

It's about time this dumbass stops trying to explain why he thought it would work and acknowledge that he needs to stop making these types of boneheaded throws in such critical parts of a game.
No. You don't do that to your pro bowl QB when the whole world is piling on. You need Romo right in the head.
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,480
No. You don't do that to your pro bowl QB when the whole world is piling on. You need Romo right in the head.
Right in the head?

What's gonna happen if he isn't "right" in the head? Make some kind of boneheaded decision that results in us a losing a game?

Oh wait....he's already doing that.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,561
No. You don't do that to your pro bowl QB when the whole world is piling on. You need Romo right in the head.
True. Probably shouldn't have done that. He's generally good at not ripping guys in the media, though, and of course you guys always criticize him for that, so....
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,265
I personally don't care who said it because it doesn't take a genius to watch that play and see that Romo losing his balance didn't matter much in the grand scheme of things.

Escobar had almost no separation and had 3 defenders convering on him.

It was a bad decision and anyone who argues otherwise is either stupid or just can't blame Romo for any of his mistakes.
I don't agree with this at all. But love the little disclaimer at the end.

If I say anybody who thinks anything other than what I believe is a retard with an agenda does it give my opinion more stroke?
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,480
I don't agree with this at all. But love the little disclaimer at the end.

If I say anybody who thinks anything other than what I believe is a retard with an agenda does it give my opinion more stroke?
No, and I actually only meant to quote you on the first line about Garrett saying Romo made a bad decision.

I got the impression that you were suggesting that it didn't necessarily hold much weight because of it who it came from?

My point was that even if it came from someone like Garrett, it's still true. It was a bad decision to even attempt that throw.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,063
Not only do I disagree with Garrett, I think it was wrong for him to say it. He completely threw his QB under the bus.
So was Coughlin wrong for calling out Eli?

We want accountability, but that goes out the window with regards to Romo?
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,063
No. You don't do that to your pro bowl QB when the whole world is piling on. You need Romo right in the head.
If Romo can't take someone telling him he made a bad choice and it messes him up, then he's not really a Pro Bowl QB.

Honestly, if you are worried about him thinking about this too much, I wouldn't. He seems to have etch-a-sketch head, even to the point he won't learn from them.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,905
So was Coughlin wrong for calling out Eli?

We want accountability, but that goes out the window with regards to Romo?
No but a good coach knows when to push buttons. Manning has been horrible for 5 games. Romo meanwhile just came off one of the greatest performances in nfl history. If you call out everyone for everything it's too much, particularly when the player played historically well outside of the one play in question. Plus Romo is already hearing criticism from here there and everywhere. Garrett saying what he said is just piling on.

As a coach you can't just turn the heat up all the time, sometimes you have to turn it down too.

Trust me, if Romo was playing as badly as Manning this season, I'd be screaming for Garrett to call him out. It's not that I think Romo is above being called out, it's just not warranted right now.
 
Top Bottom